Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jianhao He

dblp:271/4370 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 70% Quantum computing and quantum information · 30%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum algorithms
1.522024
Quantum Algorithms for Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization · NeurIPS 2024
Quantum Algorithm for Online Exp-concave Optimization · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › online optimization › online convex optimization
exp-concave optimization
0.812024
Quantum Algorithm for Online Exp-concave Optimization · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization
0.812024
Quantum Algorithms for Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
nonsmooth optimization
0.812024
Quantum Algorithms for Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization
online optimization
0.812024
Quantum Algorithm for Online Exp-concave Optimization · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods › newton's method
quasi-newton method
0.212024
Quantum Algorithm for Online Exp-concave Optimization · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › black-box optimization
zeroth-order optimization
0.212024
Quantum Algorithms for Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variance reduction · 0.8quasi-newton method · 0.8quantum gradient estimation · 0.8goldstein stationary point · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Quantum Algorithm for Online Exp-concave Optimization
abstract
We explore whether quantum advantages can be found for the zeroth-order feedback online exp-concave optimization problem, which is also known as bandit exp-concave optimization with multi-point feedback. We present quantum online quasi-Newton methods to tackle the problem and show that there exists quantum advantages for such problems. Our method approximates the Hessian by quantum estimated inexact gradient and can achieve $O(n\log T)$ regret with $O(1)$ queries at each round, where $n$ is the dimension of the decision set and $T$ is the total decision rounds. Such regret improves the optimal classical algorithm by a factor of $T^{2/3}$.
Jianhao He, Chengchang Liu, Xutong Liu 0002, Lvzhou Li, John C. S. Lui
ICML1
2024 Quantum Algorithms for Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization
abstract
This paper considers the problem for finding the $(\delta,\epsilon)$-Goldstein stationary point of Lipschitz continuous objective, which is a rich function class to cover a great number of important applications. We construct a novel zeroth-order quantum estimator for the gradient of the smoothed surrogate. Based on such estimator, we propose a novel quantum algorithm that achieves a query complexity of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(d^{3/2}\delta^{-1}\epsilon^{-3})$ on the stochastic function value oracle, where $d$ is the dimension of the problem. We also enhance the query complexity to $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(d^{3/2}\delta^{-1}\epsilon^{-7/3})$ by introducing a variance reduction variant. Our findings demonstrate the clear advantages of utilizing quantum techniques for non-convex non-smooth optimization, as they outperform the optimal classical methods on the dependency of $\epsilon$ by a factor of $\epsilon^{-2/3}$.
Chengchang Liu, Chaowen Guan, Jianhao He, John C. S. Lui
NeurIPS3