Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hans Harder
dblp:272/4300
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 61% Computational complexity · 30% Algorithms and data structures · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity
boolean function analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Unifying Formal Approach to Importance Values in Boolean Functions · IJCAI 2023 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
cooperative game theory |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Unifying Formal Approach to Importance Values in Boolean Functions · IJCAI 2023 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › cooperative game theory › solution concepts
shapley value |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | A Unifying Formal Approach to Importance Values in Boolean Functions · IJCAI 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures
symbolic computation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | A Unifying Formal Approach to Importance Values in Boolean Functions · IJCAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
projected model counting · 0.7binary decision diagrams · 0.7axiomatic framework · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | A Unifying Formal Approach to Importance Values in Boolean FunctionsabstractBoolean functions and their representation through logics, circuits, machine learning classifiers, or binary decision diagrams (BDDs) play a central role in the design and analysis of computing systems. Quantifying the relative impact of variables on the truth value by means of importance values can provide useful insights to steer system design and debugging. In this paper, we introduce a uniform framework for reasoning about such values, relying on a generic notion of importance value functions (IVFs). The class of IVFs is defined by axioms motivated from several notions of importance values introduced in the literature, including Ben-Or and Linial’s influence and Chockler, Halpern, and Kupferman’s notion of responsibility and blame. We establish a connection between IVFs and game-theoretic concepts such as Shapley and Banzhaf values, both of which measure the impact of players on outcomes in cooperative games. Exploiting BDD-based symbolic methods and projected model counting, we devise and evaluate practical computation schemes for IVFs. Hans Harder, Simon Jantsch, Christel Baier, Clemens Dubslaff |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Switss: Computing Small Witnessing SubsystemsabstractWitnessing subsystems for probabilistic reachability thresholds in discrete Markovian models are an important concept both as diagnostic information on why a property holds, and as input to refinement algorithms.We present SWITSS, a tool for the computation of Small WITnessing SubSystems.SWITSS implements exact and heuristic approaches based on reducing the problem to (mixed integer) linear programming.Returned subsystems can automatically be rendered graphically and are accompanied with a certificate which proves that the subsystem is indeed a witness. Simon Jantsch, Hans Harder, Florian Funke 0002, Christel Baier |
FMCAD | 2 |