Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Rudo
dblp:272/4382
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Hardware security and side channels · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Operating systems · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware security and side channels › microarchitectural attacks › transient execution attack
speculative execution defense |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Perspective: A Principled Framework for Pliable and Secure Speculation in Operating Systems · ISCA 2024 |
Hardware security and side channels › microarchitectural attacks
transient execution attack |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Perspective: A Principled Framework for Pliable and Secure Speculation in Operating Systems · ISCA 2024 |
Operating systems › system security › operating system security
kernel security |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Perspective: A Principled Framework for Pliable and Secure Speculation in Operating Systems · ISCA 2024 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
speculative execution |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Perspective: A Principled Framework for Pliable and Secure Speculation in Operating Systems · ISCA 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gem5 simulation · 2.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Perspective: A Principled Framework for Pliable and Secure Speculation in Operating SystemsabstractTransient execution attacks present an unprecedented threat to computing systems. Protecting the operating system (OS) is exceptionally challenging because a transient execution gadget in the OS can potentially leak the entire memory In this work, we propose Perspective, a principled framework for building pliable and secure speculative execution defenses for the OS. Perspective offers a pliable interface that allows the OS to communicate its security requirements to hardware defenses, enabling tailored protection against transient execution attacks with little performance overhead. The design of Perspective is driven by a taxonomy of transient execution attacks in the OS kernel: (i) active transient execution attacks, where the attacker process exploits its own kernel thread to speculatively execute a transient execution gadget in the kernel, and (ii) passive transient execution attacks, where the attacker coerces the victim process’s kernel thread to execute a transient execution gadget. Based on the taxonomy, Perspective introduces Data Speculation Views (DSVs) and Instruction Speculation Views (ISVs), to mitigate active and passive attacks, respectively. DSVs define the ownership of kernel data by a given execution context and block any speculative access to data outside the DSV. ISVs define the set of kernel functions that can be speculatively executed by a given execution context. Any transmitter instructions—whose execution could leak secrets, such as load instructions—that belong to kernel functions outside the ISVs are blocked from speculative execution. ISVs open up new opportunities of (i) swiftly patching gadgets in the OS, (ii) reducing the surface of passive attacks, and (iii) speeding up the process of auditing transient execution gadgets in the OS.We build Perspective’s software components in the Linux kernel and model the hardware components in gem5. We evaluate the security and performance of Perspective on a set of microbenchmarks and datacenter applications. Perspective has an execution overhead over an unprotected kernel of only $3.5 \%$ on microbenchmarks and only $1.2 \%$ on datacenter applications. David Rudo, Kaiyang Zhao 0002, Zirui Neil Zhao, Dimitrios Skarlatos 0002 |
ISCA | 2 |