Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Caldwell McCoy Jr.

dblp:272/6003 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1976
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Routing and switching · 78% Network performance modeling · 22%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Routing and switching
adaptive routing
0.011976
Effects of a Priority Discipline in Routing for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976
Network performance modeling › queueing analysis
message delay
0.011976
Effects of a Priority Discipline in Routing for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976
Routing and switching › packet switching
packet-switched networks
0.011976
Effects of a Priority Discipline in Routing for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976
Routing and switching › service disciplines
priority discipline
0.011976
Effects of a Priority Discipline in Routing for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976
Routing and switching
routing algorithms
0.011976
Effects of a Priority Discipline in Routing for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976
Routing and switching › packet switching
store-and-forward network
0.011976
Effects of a Priority Discipline in Routing for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1976 Effects of a Priority Discipline in Routing for Packet-Switched Networks
abstract
This paper addresses itself to some comparisons of adaptive routing algorithms in store-and-forward Communication nets. The intent here is to demonstrate how some relatively simple add-ons to already existing adaptive algorithms can decrease the average message delay and increase message throughput in the network. The overview of many existing routing algorithms is intended to point out that, although an algorithm may be adaptive, it is not necessarily good in terms of the performance measures addressed in this paper. The basic objective of this study is to assess the effects of endogenous priority assignment to messages that have reached some specified aging threshold while in the network and to note the effects of Such priority assignment on network performance. The performance measures are average message delay, throughput, and number of messages undelivered. The routing techniques are demonstrated via simulation on an 8node highly connected network and a 19-node Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) network. The routing algorithms are applied with and without network element destruction on the selected networks.
Raymond L. Pickholtz, Caldwell McCoy Jr.
IEEE Trans. Commun.2