VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shuyi Guo
dblp:272/6731
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7860-0661ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Multi-agent systems · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › LLM-based multi-agent systems
multi-agent LLM coordination |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MultiAgentBench : Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
milestone-based evaluation · 0.9coordination protocol analysis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | MultiAgentBench : Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agentsabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as autonomous agents; yet existing benchmarks either focus on single-agent tasks or are confined to narrow domains, failing to capture the dynamics of multi-agent coordination and competition. In this paper, we introduce MultiAgentBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate LLM-based multi-agent systems across diverse, interactive scenarios. Our framework measures not only task completion but also the quality of collaboration and competition using novel, milestone-based key performance indicators. Moreover, we evaluate various coordination protocols (including star, chain, tree, and graph topologies) and innovative strategies such as group discussion and cognitive planning. Notably, gpt-4o-mini reaches the average highest task score, graph structure performs the best among coordination protocols in the research scenario,and cognitive planning improves milestone achievement rates by 3%. Code and datasets are publicavailable at https://github.com/ulab-uiuc/MARBLE. Kunlun Zhu, Hongyi Du, Zhaochen Hong, Xiaocheng Yang, Shuyi Guo, Zhenhailong Wang, Cheng Qian 0008, Robert Tang, Heng Ji 0001, Jiaxuan You |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2021 | SFIM: Identify user behavior based on stable features
Hua Wu 0004, Qiuyan Wu, Guang Cheng 0001, Shuyi Guo, Xiaoyan Hu 0007, Shen Yan 0005 |
Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. | 4 |
| 2020 | Length Matters: Fast Internet Encrypted Traffic Service Classification based on Multi-PDU LengthsabstractEncryption of network traffic has become an inevitable trend. As an important link to Internet encrypted traffic analysis, encrypted traffic service classification can provide support for the coarse-grained network service traffic management and security supervision. But traditional DPI method cannot be effectively applied in an encrypted traffic environment, and the existing methods based on machine learning have two problems in feature selection. One is the complex feature classification over costing problem, the other is the TLS-1.2 suited method is no longer applicable to TLS-1.3 handshake encryption. To solve these problems, in this paper, we consider the differences among encryption network protocol stacks and propose a method of encrypted traffic service classification combining with capsule neural network in a multi-protocol environment by using multi-PDU lengths as the features, making full use of Markov property between PDU length sequences and being suitable to TLS1.3 environment. The feature makes our method much faster than others in feature extraction. Our control experiments on ISCX VPN-nonVPN dataset show that our method achieves a satisfactory performance (0.9860 Pr, 0.9856 Rc, 0.9855 F1), which is superior to the state-of-the-art methods. Zihan Chen 0003, Guang Cheng 0001, Bomiao Jiang, Shuye Tang, Shuyi Guo |
MSN | 5 |