Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mario D. Paez

dblp:273/1463 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1973
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 70% Image and video coding · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing › speech coding
differential PCM
0.011973
A Comparison of Optimum and Logarithmic Quantization for Speech PCM and DPCM Systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1973
Image and video coding
quantization
0.011973
A Comparison of Optimum and Logarithmic Quantization for Speech PCM and DPCM Systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1973
Audio and music processing
speech coding
0.011973
A Comparison of Optimum and Logarithmic Quantization for Speech PCM and DPCM Systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1973
Audio and music processing › speech coding
PCM
0.011973
A Comparison of Optimum and Logarithmic Quantization for Speech PCM and DPCM Systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1973

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

minimum mean-square error optimization · 0.0companding · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1973 A Comparison of Optimum and Logarithmic Quantization for Speech PCM and DPCM Systems
abstract
Two quantization rules, optimum (minimum mean-square error) and logarithmic companding, are compared for application to digital speech transmission. Comparison is made on the basis of signal-to-quantizing noise ratio (S/N), subjective quality judgments, idle channel noise, and dynamic range. These quantizers are considered in both PCM and differential PCM configurations. A computer algorithm is described that yields the optimum quantizer levels for a given speech record. It has been found that the improvement in S/N which optimum quantization affords over conventional logarithmic quantization is offset by the greater idle channel noise and smaller dynamic range (range of talker volumes handled with a lower limit on S/N) of the optimum law.
Raymond W. Stroh, Mario D. Paez
IEEE Trans. Commun.2