Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Leah L. Weber

dblp:273/1514 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
6as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6378-5648ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 6 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › single-cell genomics
single-cell DNA sequencing
1.422025
Pharming: Joint Clonal Tree Reconstruction of SNV and CNA Evolution from Single-Cell DNA Sequencing of Tumors · RECOMB 2025
doubletD: detecting doublets in single-cell DNA sequencing data · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
tumor evolution
0.912025
Pharming: Joint Clonal Tree Reconstruction of SNV and CNA Evolution from Single-Cell DNA Sequencing of Tumors · RECOMB 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › immunoinformatics
immune repertoire analysis
0.812024
TRIBAL: Tree Inference of B Cell Clonal Lineages · RECOMB 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › single-cell data preprocessing
doublet detection
0.512021
doubletD: detecting doublets in single-cell DNA sequencing data · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics › phylogenetic inference
maximum likelihood estimation
0.112021
doubletD: detecting doublets in single-cell DNA sequencing data · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology
single-cell analysis
0.112021
doubletD: detecting doublets in single-cell DNA sequencing data · Bioinform. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

phylogenetic tree inference · 1.6single-cell sequencing analysis · 0.9maximum likelihood estimation · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Pharming: Joint Clonal Tree Reconstruction of SNV and CNA Evolution from Single-Cell DNA Sequencing of Tumors
Leah L. Weber, Anna Hart, Idoia Ochoa, Mohammed El-Kebir
RECOMB1
2024 TRIBAL: Tree Inference of B Cell Clonal Lineages
Leah L. Weber, Derek Reiman, Mrinmoy Saha Roddur, Mohammed El-Kebir, Aly Azeem Khan
RECOMB1
2023 Phertilizer: Growing a clonal tree from ultra-low coverage single-cell DNA sequencing of tumors
abstract
Emerging ultra-low coverage single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNA-seq) technologies have enabled high resolution evolutionary studies of copy number aberrations (CNAs) within tumors. While these sequencing technologies are well suited for identifying CNAs due to the uniformity of sequencing coverage, the sparsity of coverage poses challenges for the study of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs). In order to maximize the utility of increasingly available ultra-low coverage scDNA-seq data and obtain a comprehensive understanding of tumor evolution, it is important to also analyze the evolution of SNVs from the same set of tumor cells. We present Phertilizer, a method to infer a clonal tree from ultra-low coverage scDNA-seq data of a tumor. Based on a probabilistic model, our method recursively partitions the data by identifying key evolutionary events in the history of the tumor. We demonstrate the performance of Phertilizer on simulated data as well as on two real datasets, finding that Phertilizer effectively utilizes the copy-number signal inherent in the data to more accurately uncover clonal structure and genotypes compared to previous methods.
Leah L. Weber, Chuanyi Zhang, Idoia Ochoa, Mohammed El-Kebir
PLoS Comput. Biol.1
2021 doubletD: detecting doublets in single-cell DNA sequencing data
abstract
MOTIVATION: While single-cell DNA sequencing (scDNA-seq) has enabled the study of intratumor heterogeneity at an unprecedented resolution, current technologies are error-prone and often result in doublets where two or more cells are mistaken for a single cell. Not only do doublets confound downstream analyses, but the increase in doublet rate is also a major bottleneck preventing higher throughput with current single-cell technologies. Although doublet detection and removal are standard practice in scRNA-seq data analysis, options for scDNA-seq data are limited. Current methods attempt to detect doublets while also performing complex downstream analyses tasks, leading to decreased efficiency and/or performance. RESULTS: We present doubletD, the first standalone method for detecting doublets in scDNA-seq data. Underlying our method is a simple maximum likelihood approach with a closed-form solution. We demonstrate the performance of doubletD on simulated data as well as real datasets, outperforming current methods for downstream analysis of scDNA-seq data that jointly infer doublets as well as standalone approaches for doublet detection in scRNA-seq data. Incorporating doubletD in scDNA-seq analysis pipelines will reduce complexity and lead to more accurate results. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/elkebir-group/doubletD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Leah L. Weber, Palash Sashittal, Mohammed El-Kebir
Bioinform.1
2020 Phyolin: Identifying a Linear Perfect Phylogeny in Single-Cell DNA Sequencing Data of Tumors
abstract
Cancer arises from an evolutionary process where somatic mutations occur and eventually give rise to clonal expansions. Modeling this evolutionary process as a phylogeny is useful for treatment decision-making as well as understanding evolutionary patterns across patients and cancer types. However, cancer phylogeny inference from single-cell DNA sequencing data of tumors is challenging due to limitations with sequencing technology and the complexity of the resulting problem. Therefore, as a first step some value might be obtained from correctly classifying the evolutionary process as either linear or branched. The biological implications of these two high-level patterns are different and understanding what cancer types and which patients have each of these trajectories could provide useful insight for both clinicians and researchers. Here, we introduce the Linear Perfect Phylogeny Flipping Problem as a means of testing a null model that the tree topology is linear and show that it is NP-hard. We develop Phyolin and, through both in silico experiments and real data application, show that it is an accurate, easy to use and a reasonably fast method for classifying an evolutionary trajectory as linear or branched.
Leah L. Weber, Mohammed El-Kebir
WABI1
2020 PhyDOSE: Design of follow-up single-cell sequencing experiments of tumors
abstract
The combination of bulk and single-cell DNA sequencing data of the same tumor enables the inference of high-fidelity phylogenies that form the input to many important downstream analyses in cancer genomics. While many studies simultaneously perform bulk and single-cell sequencing, some studies have analyzed initial bulk data to identify which mutations to target in a follow-up single-cell sequencing experiment, thereby decreasing cost. Bulk data provide an additional untapped source of valuable information, composed of candidate phylogenies and associated clonal prevalence. Here, we introduce PhyDOSE, a method that uses this information to strategically optimize the design of follow-up single cell experiments. Underpinning our method is the observation that only a small number of clones uniquely distinguish one candidate tree from all other trees. We incorporate distinguishing features into a probabilistic model that infers the number of cells to sequence so as to confidently reconstruct the phylogeny of the tumor. We validate PhyDOSE using simulations and a retrospective analysis of a leukemia patient, concluding that PhyDOSE's computed number of cells resolves tree ambiguity even in the presence of typical single-cell sequencing errors. We also conduct a retrospective analysis on an acute myeloid leukemia cohort, demonstrating the potential to achieve similar results with a significant reduction in the number of cells sequenced. In a prospective analysis, we demonstrate the advantage of selecting cells to sequence across multiple biopsies and that only a small number of cells suffice to disambiguate the solution space of trees in a recent lung cancer cohort. In summary, PhyDOSE proposes cost-efficient single-cell sequencing experiments that yield high-fidelity phylogenies, which will improve downstream analyses aimed at deepening our understanding of cancer biology.
Leah L. Weber, Nuraini Aguse, Nicholas Chia, Mohammed El-Kebir
PLoS Comput. Biol.1