Formal verification of neuro-symbolic cyber-physical systems, such as drones, medical devices and robots, is complicated. Neural components must be trained to be optimal with respect to the available data as well as the safety specifications, and then verified using specialised solvers. Symbolic models of the "cyber" and "physical" behaviour of the system must be constructed and verified in interactive theorem provers (ITPs), often requiring mature mathematical libraries to reason about the interplay of discrete and continuous dynamics, preferably obtaining infinite time-horizon guarantees. Finally, the results of the two already challenging verification tasks need to be integrated into a single proof in a coherent and consistent way, whilst preserving deployability of the resulting model. In this paper we present a compositional methodology for constructing such proofs. The Vehicle framework provides a functional, domain-specific language for specifying, training, and verifying neural components. We extend Vehicle to allow integration with any ITP with minimal effort, thereby bridging the gap between the neural and symbolic proofs. First, we describe how Vehicle’s standard bidirectional type checker can be reused to transpile neural specifications into an intermediate representation targeting multiple theorem provers. Second, we integrate Vehicle with Rocq, Isabelle/HOL, Agda and the industrial prover Imandra; and showcase a generic infinite time-horizon safety proof of a discrete cyber-physical system with a neural network controller in each ITP. Finally, to put the idea of compositional neural-cyber-physical system verification to the test, we use the Mathematical Components libraries in Rocq to verify infinite time-horizon safety of a medical device, modelled as a continuous cyber-physical system with a neural controller. To our knowledge, this is the first result of this kind in a general purpose ITP; and a result that was only feasible thanks to the compositionality provided by Vehicle's functional interface.

Formally specifying, let alone verifying, properties of systems involving multiple programming languages is inherently challenging. We introduce Heterogeneous Dynamic Logic (HDL), a framework for combining reasoning principles from distinct (dynamic) program logics in a modular and compositional way. HDL mirrors the architecture of satisfiability modulo theories (SMT): Individual dynamic logics, along with their calculi, are treated as dynamic theories that can be combined to reason about heterogeneous systems whose components are verified using different program logics. HDL provides two key operations: Lifting extends an individual dynamic theory with new program constructs (e.g., the havoc operation or regular programs) and automatically augments its calculus with sound reasoning principles for the new constructs; and Combination enables cross-language reasoning in a single modality via Heterogeneous Dynamic Theories , facilitating the reuse of existing proof infrastructure. By lifting combined theories with regular programs, we obtain heterogeneous control structures that allow us to reason about intertwined cross-language behavior. We formalize dynamic theories, their lifting and combination, and prove the soundness of all proof rules in Isabelle. We also introduce a proof rule combining deductive DL-based reasoning with reasoning principles from Kleene Algebras with Tests. Furthermore, we prove relative completeness theorems for lifting and combination: Under usual assumptions, reasoning about lifted or combined theories is no harder than reasoning about the constituent dynamic theories and their common first-order structure (i.e., the data theory). We demonstrate HDL's value by verifying an automotive case study where a Java controller (formalized in Java dynamic logic) steers a plant model (formalized in differential dynamic logic).

Abstract When validated neural networks (NNs) are pruned (and retrained) before deployment, it is desirable to prove that the new NN behaves equivalently to the (original) reference NN. To this end, our paper revisits the idea of differential verification which performs reasoning on differences between NNs: On the one hand, our paper proposes a novel abstract domain for differential verification admitting more efficient reasoning about equivalence. On the other hand, we investigate empirically and theoretically which equivalence properties are (not) efficiently solved using differential reasoning. Based on the gained insights, and following a recent line of work on confidence-based verification, we propose a novel equivalence property that is amenable to Differential Verification while providing guarantees for large parts of the input space instead of small-scale guarantees constructed w.r.t. predetermined input points. To this end, we propose an improved approach for (approximately) constraining an NN’s softmax confidence. We implement our approach in a new tool called VeryDiff and perform an extensive evaluation on numerous old and new benchmark families, including new pruned NNs for particle jet classification in the context of CERN’s LHC where we observe median speedups $$>300\times $$ > 300 × over the State-of-the-Art verifier $$\alpha ,\beta $$ α , β -CROWN.

This work presents insights gained by investigating the relationship between algorithmic fairness and the concept of secure information flow. The problem of enforcing secure information flow is well-studied in the context of information security: If secret information may "flow" through an algorithm or program in such a way that it can influence the program’s output, then that is considered insecure information flow as attackers could potentially observe (parts of) the secret. There is a strong correspondence between secure information flow and algorithmic fairness: if protected attributes such as race, gender, or age are treated as secret program inputs, then secure information flow means that these "secret" attributes cannot influence the result of a program. While most research in algorithmic fairness evaluation concentrates on studying the impact of algorithms (often treating the algorithm as a black-box), the concepts derived from information flow can be used both for the analysis of disparate treatment as well as disparate impact w.r.t. a structural causal model. In this paper, we examine the relationship between quantitative as well as qualitative information-flow properties and fairness. Moreover, based on this duality, we derive a new quantitative notion of fairness called fairness spread, which can be easily analyzed using quantitative information flow and which strongly relates to counterfactual fairness. We demonstrate that off-the-shelf tools for information-flow properties can be used in order to formally analyze a program's algorithmic fairness properties, including the new notion of fairness spread as well as established notions such as demographic parity.

While neural networks (NNs) have a large potential as autonomous controllers for Cyber-Physical Systems, verifying the safety of neural network based control systems (NNCSs) poses significant challenges for the practical use of NNs— especially when safety is needed for unbounded time horizons. One reason for this is the intractability of analyzing NNs, ODEs and hybrid systems. To this end, we introduce VerSAILLE (Verifiably Safe AI via Logically Linked Envelopes): The first general approach that allows reusing control theory literature for NNCS verification. By joining forces, we can exploit the efficiency of NN verification tools while retaining the rigor of differential dynamic logic (dL). Based on a provably safe control envelope in dL, we derive a specification for the NN which is proven with NN verification tools. We show that a proof of the NN’s adherence to the specification is then mirrored by a dL proof on the infinite-time safety of the NNCS. The NN verification properties resulting from hybrid systems typically contain nonlinear arithmetic over formulas with arbitrary logical structure while efficient NN verification tools merely support linear constraints. To overcome this divide, we present Mosaic: An efficient, sound and complete verification approach for polynomial real arithmetic properties on piece-wise linear NNs. Mosaic partitions complex NN verification queries into simple queries and lifts off-the-shelf linear constraint tools to the nonlinear setting in a completeness-preserving manner by combining approximation with exact reasoning for counterexample regions. In our evaluation we demonstrate the versatility of VerSAILLE and Mosaic: We prove infinite-time safety on the classical Vertical Airborne Collision Avoidance NNCS verification benchmark for some scenarios while (exhaustively) enumerating counterexample regions in unsafe scenarios. We also show that our approach significantly outperforms the State-of-the-Art tools in closed-loop NNV

As neural networks (NNs) are increasingly introduced into safety-critical domains, there is a growing need to formally verify NNs before deployment. In this work we focus on the formal verification problem of NN equivalence which aims to prove that two NNs (e.g. an original and a compressed version) show equivalent behavior. Two approaches have been proposed for this problem: Mixed integer linear programming and interval propagation. While the first approach lacks scalability, the latter is only suitable for structurally similar NNs with small weight changes.The contribution of our paper has four parts. First, we show a theoretical result by proving that the epsilon-equivalence problem is coNP-complete. Secondly, we extend Tran et al.’s single NN geometric path enumeration algorithm to a setting with multiple NNs. In a third step, we implement the extended algorithm for equivalence verification and evaluate optimizations necessary for its practical use. Finally, we perform a comparative evaluation showing use-cases where our approach outperforms the previous state of the art, both, for equivalence verification as well as for counter-example finding.