VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ines Zelch
dblp:273/9250
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-2659-5326ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Overview of Touché 2026: Argumentation Systems - Extended Abstract
Johannes Kiesel, Marc Feger, Tim Hagen, Sebastian Heineking, Maximilian Heinrich, Maik Fröbe, Katarina Boland, Wilhelm Pertsch, Julia Romberg, Ines Zelch, Stefan Dietze, Matthias Hagen, Martin Potthast, Benno Stein 0001 |
ECIR (4) | 10 |
| 2025 | Overview of Touché 2025: Argumentation Systems - Extended Abstract
Johannes Kiesel, Çagri Çöltekin, Marcel Gohsen, Sebastian Heineking, Maximilian Heinrich, Maik Fröbe, Tim Hagen, Mohammad Aliannejadi, Tomaz Erjavec, Matthias Hagen, Matyás Kopp, Nikola Ljubesic, Katja Meden, Nailia Mirzakhmedova, Vaidas Morkevicius, Harrisen Scells, Ines Zelch, Martin Potthast, Benno Stein 0001 |
ECIR (5) | 17 |
| 2024 | A User Study on the Acceptance of Native Advertising in Generative IRabstractCommercial conversational search engines need a business model. Since advertising is the main source of revenue for “traditional” ten-blue-links web search, ads are not an unlikely option for conversational search either. In traditional web search, ads are usually placed above organic search results. However, large language models (LLMs) may be dynamically prompted to blend product placements with “organic” conversational responses, similar to native advertising in journalism. This type of advertising can be very difficult to recognize, depending on how subtly it is integrated and disclosed. To raise awareness of this potential development, we analyze the capabilities of current LLMs to blend ads with generative search results. In a user study, we ask people about the perceived quality of (emulated) search results in different advertising scenarios. In a substantial number of cases, our survey participants do not notice brand or product placements when they do not expect them. Thus, our results show the potential of LLMs to subtly mix advertising with generated search results. This warrants further investigation, for example, to develop appropriate advertising disclosure rules, and to detect advertising in generated results. Our research also raises broader concerns about whether commercial or open-source generative models can be trusted not to be fine-tuned to generate ads rather than “genuine” responses. Ines Zelch, Matthias Hagen, Martin Potthast |
CHIIR | 1 |