Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Misaki Komatsu
dblp:273/9561
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Biometric security · 50% Security and privacy of machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial example |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | AdversariaLeak: External Information Leakage Attack Using Adversarial Samples on Face Recognition Systems · ECCV (75) 2024 |
Biometric security › biometric attack
face recognition attack |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | AdversariaLeak: External Information Leakage Attack Using Adversarial Samples on Face Recognition Systems · ECCV (75) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
adversarial samples · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | AdversariaLeak: External Information Leakage Attack Using Adversarial Samples on Face Recognition Systems
Roye Katzav, Amit Giloni, Edita Grolman, Hiroo Saito, Tomoyuki Shibata, Tsukasa Omino, Misaki Komatsu, Yoshikazu Hanatani, Yuval Elovici, Asaf Shabtai |
ECCV (75) | 7 |
| 2024 | Query-Based External Information Leakage Attacks on Face Recognition ModelsabstractRecent studies have demonstrated external information leakage (EIL) attacks which allow an attacker to infer various sensitive implicit properties related to a machine learning (ML) model’s training data. Most of those attacks assumed 1) a white-box scenario in which the attacker has complete access to the ML model, its structure, and its parameters, or 2) a black-box (alternatively gray-box) scenario with non-realistic requirements such as a high query budget or high computational resources for the attacker. In this paper, we propose two practical query-based (i.e., black-box) EIL attacks that target face recognition ML models and allow an attacker to infer sensitive implicit properties, such as the facial characteristics, gender, ethnicity, income level, and average age of the individuals in the training data, with a limited number of queries. The first proposed attack, referred to as the random noise injection (RNI) attack, exploits the effect of injecting random noise into input samples on the target model’s predictions. The second proposed attack, referred to as the property substitute model (PSM) attack, creates a substitute model for each property value examined, whose predictions are compared to the target model’s predictions. Our comprehensive evaluation (a total of 730 experiments) performed on the CelebA dataset shows that the proposed attacks outperform existing EIL attacks and successfully infer private information, posing a threat to the privacy and security of the face recognition models. Edita Grolman, Amit Giloni, Ryuta Kremer, Hiroo Saito, Tomoyuki Shibata, Tsukasa Omino, Misaki Komatsu, Yoshikazu Hanatani, Asaf Shabtai, Yuval Elovici |
IJCNN | 7 |
| 2020 | Semantic Definition of Anonymity in Identity-Based Encryption and Its Relation to Indistinguishability-Based Definition
Goichiro Hanaoka, Misaki Komatsu, Kazuma Ohara, Yusuke Sakai 0001, Shota Yamada 0001 |
ESORICS (2) | 2 |