Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Misaki Komatsu

dblp:273/9561 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Biometric security · 50% Security and privacy of machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial example
0.812024
AdversariaLeak: External Information Leakage Attack Using Adversarial Samples on Face Recognition Systems · ECCV (75) 2024
Biometric security › biometric attack
face recognition attack
0.812024
AdversariaLeak: External Information Leakage Attack Using Adversarial Samples on Face Recognition Systems · ECCV (75) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

adversarial samples · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 AdversariaLeak: External Information Leakage Attack Using Adversarial Samples on Face Recognition Systems
Roye Katzav, Amit Giloni, Edita Grolman, Hiroo Saito, Tomoyuki Shibata, Tsukasa Omino, Misaki Komatsu, Yoshikazu Hanatani, Yuval Elovici, Asaf Shabtai
ECCV (75)7
2024 Query-Based External Information Leakage Attacks on Face Recognition Models
abstract
Recent studies have demonstrated external information leakage (EIL) attacks which allow an attacker to infer various sensitive implicit properties related to a machine learning (ML) model’s training data. Most of those attacks assumed 1) a white-box scenario in which the attacker has complete access to the ML model, its structure, and its parameters, or 2) a black-box (alternatively gray-box) scenario with non-realistic requirements such as a high query budget or high computational resources for the attacker. In this paper, we propose two practical query-based (i.e., black-box) EIL attacks that target face recognition ML models and allow an attacker to infer sensitive implicit properties, such as the facial characteristics, gender, ethnicity, income level, and average age of the individuals in the training data, with a limited number of queries. The first proposed attack, referred to as the random noise injection (RNI) attack, exploits the effect of injecting random noise into input samples on the target model’s predictions. The second proposed attack, referred to as the property substitute model (PSM) attack, creates a substitute model for each property value examined, whose predictions are compared to the target model’s predictions. Our comprehensive evaluation (a total of 730 experiments) performed on the CelebA dataset shows that the proposed attacks outperform existing EIL attacks and successfully infer private information, posing a threat to the privacy and security of the face recognition models.
Edita Grolman, Amit Giloni, Ryuta Kremer, Hiroo Saito, Tomoyuki Shibata, Tsukasa Omino, Misaki Komatsu, Yoshikazu Hanatani, Asaf Shabtai, Yuval Elovici
IJCNN7
2020 Semantic Definition of Anonymity in Identity-Based Encryption and Its Relation to Indistinguishability-Based Definition
Goichiro Hanaoka, Misaki Komatsu, Kazuma Ohara, Yusuke Sakai 0001, Shota Yamada 0001
ESORICS (2)2