Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dima Karamshuk
dblp:274/0764
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-1691-1891ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 44% Optimization for machine learning · 34% Efficient and distributed learning · 22% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Approximation and online algorithms · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | MCGrad: Multicalibration at Web Scale · KDD (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness criteria
multicalibration |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | MCGrad: Multicalibration at Web Scale · KDD (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Convergence of Loss and Uncertainty-based Active Learning Algorithms · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic gradient descent
adaptive step size |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Convergence of Loss and Uncertainty-based Active Learning Algorithms · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Convergence of Loss and Uncertainty-based Active Learning Algorithms · NeurIPS 2024 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Online Learning with Sublinear Best-Action Queries · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
regret bounds |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Online Learning with Sublinear Best-Action Queries · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
data subset selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | On the Convergence of Loss and Uncertainty-based Active Learning Algorithms · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regret analysis · 0.8polyak step size · 0.8best-action queries · 0.8adaptive-weight sampling · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | MCGrad: Multicalibration at Web Scale
Niek Tax, Lorenzo Perini, Fridolin Linder, Daniel Haimovich, Dima Karamshuk, Nastaran Okati, Milan Vojnovic, Pavlos Athanasios Apostolopoulos |
KDD (1) | 5 |
| 2024 | Online Learning with Sublinear Best-Action QueriesabstractIn online learning, a decision maker repeatedly selects one of a set of actions, with the goal of minimizing the overall loss incurred. Following the recent line of research on algorithms endowed with additional predictive features, we revisit this problem by allowing the decision maker to acquire additional information on the actions to be selected. In particular, we study the power of \emph{best-action queries}, which reveal beforehand the identity of the best action at a given time step. In practice, predictive features may be expensive, so we allow the decision maker to issue at most $k$ such queries.
We establish tight bounds on the performance any algorithm can achieve when given access to $k$ best-action queries for different types of feedback models. In particular, we prove that in the full feedback model, $k$ queries are enough to achieve an optimal regret of $\Theta(\min\{\sqrt T, \frac{T}{k}\})$. This finding highlights the significant multiplicative advantage in the regret rate achievable with even a modest (sublinear) number $k \in \Omega(\sqrt{T})$ of queries.
Additionally, we study the challenging setting in which the only available feedback is obtained during the time steps corresponding to the $k$ best-action queries. There, we provide a tight regret rate of $\Theta(\min\{\frac{T}{\sqrt k},\frac{T^2}{k^2}\})$, which improves over the standard $\Theta(\frac{T}{\sqrt k})$ regret rate for label efficient prediction for $k \in \Omega(T^{2/3})$. Matteo Russo 0002, Andrea Celli, Riccardo Colini-Baldeschi, Federico Fusco 0001, Daniel Haimovich, Dima Karamshuk, Stefano Leonardi 0001, Niek Tax |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2024 | On the Convergence of Loss and Uncertainty-based Active Learning AlgorithmsabstractWe investigate the convergence rates and data sample sizes required for training a machine learning model using a stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithm, where data points are sampled based on either their loss value or uncertainty value. These training methods are particularly relevant for active learning and data subset selection problems. For SGD with a constant step size update, we present convergence results for linear classifiers and linearly separable datasets using squared hinge loss and similar training loss functions. Additionally, we extend our analysis to more general classifiers and datasets, considering a wide range of loss-based sampling strategies and smooth convex training loss functions. We propose a novel algorithm called Adaptive-Weight Sampling (AWS) that utilizes SGD with an adaptive step size that achieves stochastic Polyak's step size in expectation. We establish convergence rate results for AWS for smooth convex training loss functions. Our numerical experiments demonstrate the efficiency of AWS on various datasets by using either exact or estimated loss values. Daniel Haimovich, Dima Karamshuk, Fridolin Linder, Niek Tax, Milan Vojnovic |
NeurIPS | 2 |