Brenda Curtis

dblp:274/1668 · also Brenda L. Curtis · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-2511-3322ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Knowing When Not to Answer: Lightweight KB-Aligned OOD Detection for Safe RAG
abstract
Ilias Triantafyllopoulos, Renyi Qu, Salvatore Giorgi, Brenda Curtis, Lyle Ungar, João Sedoc. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Ilias Triantafyllopoulos, Renyi Qu, Salvatore Giorgi, Brenda Curtis, Lyle H. Ungar, João Sedoc
ACL (1)4
2025 The Illusion of Empathy: How AI Chatbots Shape Conversation Perception
abstract
As AI chatbots increasingly incorporate empathy, understanding user-centered perceptions of chatbot empathy and its impact on conversation quality remains essential yet under-explored. This study examines how chatbot identity and perceived empathy influence users' overall conversation experience. Analyzing 155 conversations from two datasets, we found that while GPT-based chatbots were rated significantly higher in conversational quality, they were consistently perceived as less empathetic than human conversational partners. Empathy ratings from GPT-4o annotations aligned with user ratings, reinforcing the perception of lower empathy in chatbots compared to humans. Our findings underscore the critical role of perceived empathy in shaping conversation quality, revealing that achieving high-quality human-AI interactions requires more than simply embedding empathetic language; it necessitates addressing the nuanced ways users interpret and experience empathy in conversations with chatbots.
Salvatore Giorgi, Ankit Aich, Allison Lahnala, Brenda Curtis, Lyle H. Ungar, João Sedoc
AAAI5
2024 Lived Experience Matters: Automatic Detection of Stigma toward People Who Use Substances on Social Media
abstract
Stigma toward people who use substances (PWUS) is a leading barrier to seeking treatment. Further, those in treatment are more likely to drop out if they experience higher levels of stigmatization. While related concepts of hate speech and toxicity, including those targeted toward vulnerable populations, have been the focus of automatic content moderation research, stigma and, in particular, people who use substances have not. This paper explores stigma toward PWUS using a data set of roughly 5,000 public Reddit posts. We performed a crowd-sourced annotation task where workers are asked to annotate each post for the presence of stigma toward PWUS and answer a series of questions related to their experiences with substance use. Results show that workers who use substances or know someone with a substance use disorder are more likely to rate a post as stigmatizing. Building on this, we use a supervised machine learning framework that centers workers with lived substance use experience to label each Reddit post as stigmatizing. Modeling person-level demographics in addition to comment-level language results in a classification accuracy (as measured by AUC) of 0.69 -- a 17% increase over modeling language alone. Finally, we explore the linguist cues which distinguish stigmatizing content: PWUS substances and those who don't agree that language around othering ("people", "they") and terms like "addict" are stigmatizing, while PWUS (as opposed to those who do not) find discussions around specific substances more stigmatizing. Our findings offer insights into the nature of perceived stigma in substance use. Additionally, these results further establish the subjective nature of such machine learning tasks, highlighting the need for understanding their social contexts.
Salvatore Giorgi, Douglas Bellew, Daniel Roy Sadek Habib, João Sedoc, Chase Smitterberg, Amanda Devoto, McKenzie Himelein-Wachowiak, Brenda Curtis
ICWSM8
2023 Different Affordances on Facebook and SMS Text Messaging Do Not Impede Generalization of Language-Based Predictive Models
abstract
Adaptive mobile device-based health interventions often use machine learning models trained on non-mobile device data, such as social media text, due to the difficulty and high expense of collecting large text message (SMS) data. Therefore, understanding the differences and generalization of models between these platforms is crucial for proper deployment. We examined the psycho-linguistic differences between Facebook and text messages, and their impact on out-of-domain model performance, using a sample of 120 users who shared both. We found that users use Facebook for sharing experiences (e.g., leisure) and SMS for task-oriented and conversational purposes (e.g., plan confirmations), reflecting the differences in the affordances. To examine the downstream effects of these differences, we used pre-trained Facebook-based language models to estimate age, gender, depression, life satisfaction, and stress on both Facebook and SMS. We found no significant differences in correlations between the estimates and self-reports across 6 of 8 models. These results suggest using pre-trained Facebook language models to achieve better accuracy with just-in-time interventions.
Salvatore Giorgi, Xiangyu Tao, Sharath Chandra Guntuku, Douglas Bellew, Brenda Curtis, Lyle H. Ungar
ICWSM6
2022 Twitter Corpus of the #BlackLivesMatter Movement and Counter Protests: 2013 to 2021
Salvatore Giorgi, Sharath Chandra Guntuku, McKenzie Himelein-Wachowiak, Amy Kwarteng, Sy Hwang, Muhammad Rahman 0004, Brenda Curtis
ICWSM7