Stablecoins have emerged as a rapidly growing digital payment instrument, raising the question of whether blockchain-based settlement can function as a substitute for incumbent card networks in retail payments. This Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) provides a systematic comparison between stablecoin payment arrangements and card networks by situating both within a unified analytical framework. We first map their respective payment infrastructures, participant roles, and transaction lifecycles, highlighting fundamental differences in how authorization, settlement, and recourse are organized. Building on this mapping, we introduce the CLEAR framework, which evaluates retail payment systems across five dimensions: cost, legality, experience, architecture, and reach. Our analysis shows that stablecoins deliver efficient, continuous, and programmable settlement, often compressing rail-level merchant fees and enabling 24/7 value transfer. However, these advantages are accompanied by an inversion of the traditional pricing and risk-allocation structure. Card networks internalize consumer-side frictions through subsidies, standardized liability rules, and post-transaction recourse, thereby supporting mass-market adoption. Stablecoin arrangements, by contrast, externalize transaction fees, error prevention, and dispute resolution to users, intermediaries, and courts, resulting in weaker consumer protection, higher cognitive burden at the point of interaction, and fragmented acceptance. Accordingly, stablecoins exhibit a conditional comparative advantage in closed-loop environments, cross-border corridors, and high-friction payment contexts, but remain structurally disadvantaged as open-loop retail payment instruments.

Memecoins, emerging from internet culture and community-driven narratives, have rapidly evolved into a unique class of crypto assets. Unlike technology-driven cryptocurrencies, their market dynamics are primarily shaped by viral social media diffusion, celebrity influence, and speculative capital inflows. To capture the distinctive vulnerabilities of these ecosystems, we present the first Memecoin Ecosystem Fragility Framework (ME2F). ME2F formalizes memecoin risks in three dimensions: i) Volatility Dynamics Score capturing persistent and extreme price swings together with spillover from base chains; ii) Whale Dominance Score quantifying ownership concentration among top holders; and iii) Sentiment Amplification Score measuring the impact of attention-driven shocks on market stability. We apply ME2F to representative tokens (over 65% market share) and show that fragility is not evenly distributed across the ecosystem. Politically themed tokens such as TRUMP, MELANIA, and LIBRA concentrate the highest risks, combining volatility, ownership concentration, and sensitivity to sentiment shocks. Established memecoins such as DOGE, SHIB, and PEPE fall into an intermediate range. Benchmark tokens ETH and SOL remain consistently resilient due to deeper liquidity and institutional participation. Our findings provide the first ecosystem-level evidence of memecoin fragility and highlight governance implications for enhancing market resilience in the Web3 era.

Cryptocurrencies have dramatically increased adoption in mainstream applications in various fields such as financial and online services, however, there are still a few amounts of cryptocurrency transactions that involve illicit or criminal activities. It is essential to identify and monitor addresses associated with illegal behaviors to ensure the security and stability of the cryptocurrency ecosystem. In this paper, we propose a framework to build a dataset comprising Bitcoin transactions between 12 July 2019 and 26 May 2021. This dataset (hereafter referred to as BABD-13) contains 13 types of Bitcoin addresses, 5 categories of indicators with 148 features, and 544,462 labeled data, which is the largest labeled Bitcoin address behavior dataset publicly available to our knowledge. We also propose a novel and efficient subgraph generation algorithm called BTC-SubGen to extract a${k}$-hop subgraph from the entire Bitcoin transaction graph constructed by the directed heterogeneous multigraph starting from a specific Bitcoin address node. We then conduct 13-class classification tasks on BABD-13 by five machine learning models namely${k}$-nearest neighbors algorithm, decision tree, random forest, multilayer perceptron, and XGBoost, the results show that the accuracy rates are between 93.24% and 97.13%. In addition, we study the relations and importance of the proposed features and analyze how they affect the effect of machine learning models. Finally, we conduct a preliminary analysis of the behavior patterns of different types of Bitcoin addresses using concrete features and find several meaningful and explainable modes.

The growing acceptance and popularity of cryptocurrencies have boosted the digital financial markets, which have also increased crime risk due to their anonymity and decentralization. Appropriately monitoring decentralized cryptocurrency, particularly Bitcoin, can prevent participants from financial loss and benefit the community. Therefore, in this paper, we build the first Bitcoin address subgraph dataset called BASD-8, which contains 3,830 labeled Bitcoin address subgraphs, and we study the structural characteristics of these subgraphs, aiming at identifying eight common types of Bitcoin addresses to distinguish between normal and abnormal addresses. Three methods are utilized to exploit subgraph patterns: complex network, machine learning, and empirical analysis. Specifically, we calculate ten vital metrics of subgraphs as features to train address classifiers using basic machine learning models. Also, a graph neural network model is trained as a graph-level classifier, and the experimental results with the best f1-score of 91.35% illustrate the effectiveness of our dataset and study methods. Furthermore, we conduct a detailed empirical pattern analysis combining the subgraph structures and the definitions of each category of Bitcoin addresses.