VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhicheng Jiang
dblp:274/5985
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › score-based generative model
denoising diffusion |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Is Noise Conditioning Necessary for Denoising Generative Models? · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Is Noise Conditioning Necessary for Denoising Generative Models? · ICML 2025 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › image denoising
blind image denoising |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Is Noise Conditioning Necessary for Denoising Generative Models? · ICML 2025 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Is Noise Conditioning Necessary for Denoising Generative Models? · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mathematical error analysis · 1.7FID evaluation · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Wavelet Quadtree Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalisation Tablet Enhancement Method for Defect Detection in Low-Contrast TabletsabstractABSTRACT In pharmaceutical manufacturing, tablets experience flaws like half‐grain tablets, multi‐pill tablets and paste tablets as a result of breaking, adhesion or inadequate pressing. The packaging material, typically composed of dual aluminium foil, exhibits high reflectivity. This reduces the overall image contrast and weakens the feature differences between defective areas and the background. This phenomenon significantly affects the accuracy of defect detection in pharmaceutical quality control. To address the above problems, this paper proposes a contrast enhancement method called Wavelet Quadtree Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalisation Tablet Enhancement (WCTE) for tablet images. The method combines Haar Wavelet Transform and CLAHE with adaptive quadtree chunking to enhance the detection accuracy of low‐contrast tablets. The proposed approach uses Haar wavelets to decompose tablet images at multiple scales. It then applies power transform enhancement and soft‐threshold denoising to sub‐bands of different frequencies, highlighting edge details and suppressing background interference. The image is reconstructed by the inverse wavelet transform. To avoid edge artefacts and local over‐enhancement from fixed blocks, an adaptive quadtree CLAHE strategy driven by local variance is applied. This allows adaptive segmentation of enhancement regions and ensures smooth transitions. The YOLOv11 model is utilised to identify the target in the augmented tablet image, facilitating the precise classification of typical flaws such as half‐grain tablets, multi‐pill tablets and paste tablets. Experimental results show that WCTE‐enhanced images outperform both traditional CLAHE and unenhanced ones in entropy, contrast, clarity and average gradient. The comprehensive scores improve by 27.15% and 11.42% relative to the original and CLAHE images, respectively. The YOLOv11 model demonstrates a significant enhancement in defect detection accuracy for WCTE‐enhanced images, with improvements of 13.33% and 9.06% for half‐grain tablets and paste‐like defects, respectively. The accuracy for multi‐pill defects remains stable, while the overall mean average precision (mAP) increases by 2.5%, and the false detection rate decreases by 9%. This improvement further substantiates the efficacy and applicability of this method in low‐contrast target detection tasks. Zimei Tu, Qinna Wang, Zhicheng Jiang, Jinhua Jiang |
IET Image Process. | 3 |
| 2025 | Is Noise Conditioning Necessary for Denoising Generative Models?abstractIt is widely believed that noise conditioning is indispensable for denoising diffusion models to work successfully. This work challenges this belief. Motivated by research on blind image denoising, we investigate a variety of denoising-based generative models in the absence of noise conditioning. To our surprise, most models exhibit graceful degradation, and in some cases, they even perform better without noise conditioning. We provide a mathematical analysis of the error introduced by removing noise conditioning and demonstrate that our analysis aligns with empirical observations. We further introduce a noise-*unconditional* model that achieves a competitive FID of 2.23 on CIFAR-10, significantly narrowing the gap to leading noise-conditional models. We hope our findings will inspire the community to revisit the foundations and formulations of denoising generative models. Zhicheng Jiang, Hanhong Zhao, Kaiming He |
ICML | 2 |