Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ella Kazerooni
dblp:274/6783
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-5859-8744ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Image recognition and object detection · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DEPICT: Diffusion-Enabled Permutation Importance for Image Classification Tasks · ECCV (64) 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DEPICT: Diffusion-Enabled Permutation Importance for Image Classification Tasks · ECCV (64) 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › feature importance
permutation importance |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DEPICT: Diffusion-Enabled Permutation Importance for Image Classification Tasks · ECCV (64) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffusion model · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | DEPICT: Diffusion-Enabled Permutation Importance for Image Classification Tasks
Sarah Jabbour, Gregory Kondas, Ella Kazerooni, Michael W. Sjoding, David F. Fouhey, Jenna Wiens |
ECCV (64) | 3 |
| 2022 | Combining chest X-rays and electronic health record (EHR) data using machine learning to diagnose acute respiratory failureabstractOBJECTIVE: When patients develop acute respiratory failure (ARF), accurately identifying the underlying etiology is essential for determining the best treatment. However, differentiating between common medical diagnoses can be challenging in clinical practice. Machine learning models could improve medical diagnosis by aiding in the diagnostic evaluation of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Machine learning models were trained to predict the common causes of ARF (pneumonia, heart failure, and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]). Models were trained using chest radiographs and clinical data from the electronic health record (EHR) and applied to an internal and external cohort. RESULTS: The internal cohort of 1618 patients included 508 (31%) with pneumonia, 363 (22%) with heart failure, and 137 (8%) with COPD based on physician chart review. A model combining chest radiographs and EHR data outperformed models based on each modality alone. Models had similar or better performance compared to a randomly selected physician reviewer. For pneumonia, the combined model area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.79 (0.77-0.79), image model AUROC was 0.74 (0.72-0.75), and EHR model AUROC was 0.74 (0.70-0.76). For heart failure, combined: 0.83 (0.77-0.84), image: 0.80 (0.71-0.81), and EHR: 0.79 (0.75-0.82). For COPD, combined: AUROC = 0.88 (0.83-0.91), image: 0.83 (0.77-0.89), and EHR: 0.80 (0.76-0.84). In the external cohort, performance was consistent for heart failure and increased for COPD, but declined slightly for pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning models combining chest radiographs and EHR data can accurately differentiate between common causes of ARF. Further work is needed to determine how these models could act as a diagnostic aid to clinicians in clinical settings. Sarah Jabbour, David F. Fouhey, Ella Kazerooni, Jenna Wiens, Michael W. Sjoding |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 3 |