Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Nicolas K. Shinada

dblp:274/7623 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-2060-9676ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › user recommendation
reciprocal recommendation
0.512021
A Reciprocal Embedding Framework For Modelling Mutual Preferences · AAAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

matrix factorization · 0.5embedding · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 A Reciprocal Embedding Framework For Modelling Mutual Preferences
abstract
Understanding the mutual preferences between potential dating partners is core to the success of modern web-scale personalized recommendation systems that power online dating platforms. In contrast to classical user-item recommendation systems which model the unidirectional preferences of users to items, understanding the bidirectional preferences between people in a reciprocal recommendation system is more complex and challenging given the dynamic nature of interactions. In this paper, we describe a reciprocal recommendation system we built for one of the leading online dating applications in Japan. We also discuss the lessons learnt from designing, developing and deploying the reciprocal recommendation system in production.
R. Ramanathan 0002, Nicolas K. Shinada, Michinobu Shimatani, Yuhei Yamaguchi, Junichi Tanaka, Yuta Iizuka, Sucheendra K. Palaniappan
AAAI2
2020 Building a reciprocal recommendation system at scale from scratch: Learnings from one of Japan's prominent dating applications
abstract
Online dating platforms have changed the paradigm of how people seek potential relationships. In this context, reciprocal recommendation systems consider the mutual ’match’ potential between users, i.e users who are likely to interact and potentially ’like’ each other. We present our experiences on how we devised algorithms to overcome data specific nuances, built and deployed the system from scratch in a relatively short time-span for one of the prominent dating applications in Japan.
R. Ramanathan 0002, Nicolas K. Shinada, Sucheendra K. Palaniappan
RecSys2