Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gilles Bareilles
dblp:274/8429
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-6389-1767ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 43% Trustworthy machine learning · 35% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 16% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › robust distributed learning
byzantine-robust distributed learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Brief Announcement: Byzantine Machine Learning, MultiKrum and an Optimal Notion of Robustness · PODC 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › model aggregation
robust aggregation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Brief Announcement: Byzantine Machine Learning, MultiKrum and an Optimal Notion of Robustness · PODC 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Brief Announcement: Byzantine Machine Learning, MultiKrum and an Optimal Notion of Robustness · PODC 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction › ranking model
bradley-terry model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Generalizing while preserving monotonicity in comparison-based preference learning models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Brief Announcement: Byzantine Machine Learning, MultiKrum and an Optimal Notion of Robustness · PODC 2026 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion prior |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Generalizing while preserving monotonicity in comparison-based preference learning models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
robust mean estimation · 1.0convergence analysis · 1.0embedding conditions · 0.9diffusion prior · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Brief Announcement: Byzantine Machine Learning, MultiKrum and an Optimal Notion of RobustnessabstractAggregation rules are the cornerstone of distributed (or federated) learning in the presence of adversaries, under the so-called Byzantine threat model. They are also interesting mathematical objects from the point of view of robust mean estimation. The Krum aggregation rule has been extensively studied, and endowed with formal robustness and convergence guarantees. Yet, MultiKrum, a natural extension of Krum, is often preferred in practice for its superior empirical performance, even though no theoretical guarantees were available until now. In this work, we provide the first proof that MultiKrum is a robust aggregation rule, and bound its robustness coefficient. To do so, we introduce κ*, the optimal robustness coefficient of an aggregation rule, which quantifies the accuracy of mean estimation in the presence of adversaries in a tighter manner compared with previously adopted notions of robustness. We then construct an upper and a lower bound on MultiKrum's robustness coefficient. As a by-product, we also improve on the best-known bounds on Krum's robustness coefficient. We show that MultiKrum's bounds are never worse than Krum's, and better in realistic regimes. In the full paper, we also illustrate this analysis by an experimental investigation on the quality of the lower bound. Gilles Bareilles, Wassim Bouaziz, Julien Fageot, El Mahdi El Mhamdi |
PODC | 1 |
| 2025 | Generalizing while preserving monotonicity in comparison-based preference learning modelsabstractIf you tell a learning model that you prefer an alternative $a$ over another alternative $b$, then you probably expect the model to be *monotone*, that is, the valuation of $a$ increases, and that of $b$ decreases. Yet, perhaps surprisingly, many widely deployed comparison-based preference learning models, including large language models, fail to have this guarantee. Until now, the only comparison-based preference learning algorithms that were proved to be monotone are the Generalized Bradley-Terry models. Yet, these models are unable to generalize to uncompared data. In this paper, we advance the understanding of the set of models with generalization ability that are *monotone*. Namely, we propose a new class of Linear Generalized Bradley-Terry models with Diffusion Priors, and identify sufficient conditions on alternatives' embeddings that guarantee monotonicity. Our experiments show that this monotonicity is far from being a general guarantee, and that our new class of generalizing models improves accuracy, especially when the dataset is limited. Julien Fageot, Peva Blanchard, Gilles Bareilles, Lê-Nguyên Hoang |
NeurIPS | 3 |