Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dylan Swart

dblp:274/9814 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 67% Legged, aerial and field robots · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory optimization
direct collocation
0.612022
Trajectory Optimization Formulation with Smooth Analytical Derivatives for Track-leg and Wheel-leg Ground Robots · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.612022
Trajectory Optimization Formulation with Smooth Analytical Derivatives for Track-leg and Wheel-leg Ground Robots · ICRA 2022
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
nonlinear optimization
0.212022
Trajectory Optimization Formulation with Smooth Analytical Derivatives for Track-leg and Wheel-leg Ground Robots · ICRA 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nonlinear optimization · 1.1direct collocation · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Trajectory Optimization Formulation with Smooth Analytical Derivatives for Track-leg and Wheel-leg Ground Robots
abstract
Tracks, wheels, and legs are all useful locomotion modes for Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs), and ground robots that combine these mechanisms have the potential to climb over large obstacles. As robot morphologies include more degrees of freedom and obstacles become increasingly large and complex, UGVs will need to rely on automatic motion planning to compute the joint trajectories for traversal. This article presents a trajectory optimization formulation for multibody UGVs with combined wheel-leg and track-leg designs. We derive the dynamics and constraints for rolling wheels and circulating elliptical tracks. Using direct collocation, we formulate a model-based trajectory optimization where all constraints and objectives are written in closed-form with smooth and exact derivatives for tractable computation times with existing large-scale nonlinear optimization solvers (<1 minute). We demonstrate the trajectory optimization on numerous simulated planar wheel-leg and track-leg morphologies completing locomotion tasks, demonstrating full body dynamic coupling for the multibody system. Future work will extend this formulation to 3D and include contact planning.
Adwait Mane, Dylan Swart, Christian Hubicki
ICRA2
2020 Force-based Control of Bipedal Balancing on Dynamic Terrain with the "Tallahassee Cassie" Robotic Platform
abstract
Out in the field, bipedal robots need to travel on terrain that is uneven, non-rigid, and sometimes moving beneath their feet. We present a force-based double support balancing controller for such dynamic terrain scenarios for bipedal robots, and test it on the robotic bipedal platform "Tallahassee Cassie." The presented controller relies on minimal information about the robot model, requiring its kinematics and overall weight, but not inertias of individual links or components. The controller is pelvis-centric, commanding pelvis positions in Cartesian space, which a model-free PD controller converts to motor torques in joint space. By commanding forces, torques, and a frontal center of pressure in this fashion, Tallahassee Cassie is capable of balancing on a variety of scenarios, from a lifting/sliding platform, to soft foam, to a sudden drop. These results show the potential for bipedal control to balance successfully despite minimal model information, the presence of large dynamic impacts-e.g., falling through trap door, and soft series-spring deflections. These results motivate future work for walking and running controllers on dynamic terrain with relatively low reliance on modeling information.
Dylan Swart, Christian Hubicki
ICRA2