Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jonathan Aellen

dblp:275/8287 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 90% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 10%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
injective flow
0.912025
Injective flows for star-like manifolds · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
0.912025
Injective flows for star-like manifolds · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
continuous normalizing flow
0.812024
Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation Laws · ICLR 2024
Computational science and engineering
fluid dynamics
0.812024
Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation Laws · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.312025
Injective flows for star-like manifolds · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

diffeomorphism · 1.5continuity equation · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Injective flows for star-like manifolds
abstract
Normalizing Flows (NFs) are powerful and efficient models for density estimation. When modeling densities on manifolds, NFs can be generalized to injective flows but the Jacobian determinant becomes computationally prohibitive. Current approaches either consider bounds on the log-likelihood or rely on some approximations of the Jacobian determinant. In contrast, we propose injective flows for star-like manifolds and show that for such manifolds we can compute the Jacobian determinant exactly and efficiently. This aspect is particularly relevant for variational inference settings, where no samples are available and only some unnormalized target is known. Among many, we showcase the relevance of modeling densities on star-like manifolds in two settings. Firstly, we introduce a novel Objective Bayesian approach for penalized likelihood models by interpreting level-sets of the penalty as star-like manifolds. Secondly, we consider probabilistic mixing models and introduce a general method for variational inference by defining the posterior of mixture weights on the probability simplex.
Marcello Massimo Negri, Jonathan Aellen, Volker Roth 0001
ICLR2
2024 Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation Laws
abstract
We introduce Lagrangian Flow Networks (LFlows) for modeling fluid densities and velocities continuously in space and time. By construction, the proposed LFlows satisfy the continuity equation, a PDE describing mass conservation in its differential form. Our model is based on the insight that solutions to the continuity equation can be expressed as time-dependent density transformations via differentiable and invertible maps. This follows from classical theory of the existence and uniqueness of Lagrangian flows for smooth vector fields. Hence, we model fluid densities by transforming a base density with parameterized diffeomorphisms conditioned on time. The key benefit compared to methods relying on numerical ODE solvers or PINNs is that the analytic expression of the velocity is always consistent with changes in density. Furthermore, we require neither expensive numerical solvers, nor additional penalties to enforce the PDE. LFlows show higher predictive accuracy in density modeling tasks compared to competing models in 2D and 3D, while being computationally efficient. As a real-world application, we model bird migration based on sparse weather radar measurements.
Fabricio Arend Torres, Marcello Massimo Negri, Marco Inversi, Jonathan Aellen, Volker Roth 0001
ICLR4
2021 Sequential Gaussian Process Regression for Simultaneous Pathology Detection and Shape Reconstruction
Dana Rahbani, Andreas Morel-Forster, Dennis Madsen, Jonathan Aellen, Thomas Vetter
MICCAI (5)4