VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonathan Aellen
dblp:275/8287
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 90% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 10% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
injective flow |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Injective flows for star-like manifolds · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Injective flows for star-like manifolds · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
continuous normalizing flow |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation Laws · ICLR 2024 |
Computational science and engineering
fluid dynamics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation Laws · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Injective flows for star-like manifolds · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffeomorphism · 1.5continuity equation · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Injective flows for star-like manifoldsabstractNormalizing Flows (NFs) are powerful and efficient models for density estimation. When modeling densities on manifolds, NFs can be generalized to injective flows but the Jacobian determinant becomes computationally prohibitive. Current approaches either consider bounds on the log-likelihood or rely on some approximations of the Jacobian determinant. In contrast, we propose injective flows for star-like manifolds and show that for such manifolds we can compute the Jacobian determinant exactly and efficiently. This aspect is particularly relevant for variational inference settings, where no samples are available and only some unnormalized target is known. Among many, we showcase the relevance of modeling densities on star-like manifolds in two settings. Firstly, we introduce a novel Objective Bayesian approach for penalized likelihood models by interpreting level-sets of the penalty as star-like manifolds. Secondly, we consider probabilistic mixing models and introduce a general method for variational inference by defining the posterior of mixture weights on the probability simplex. Marcello Massimo Negri, Jonathan Aellen, Volker Roth 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Lagrangian Flow Networks for Conservation LawsabstractWe introduce Lagrangian Flow Networks (LFlows) for modeling fluid densities and velocities continuously in space and time.
By construction, the proposed LFlows satisfy the continuity equation,
a PDE describing mass conservation in its differential form.
Our model is based on the insight that solutions to the continuity equation can be expressed as
time-dependent density transformations via differentiable and invertible maps.
This follows from classical theory of the existence and uniqueness of Lagrangian flows for smooth vector fields.
Hence, we model fluid densities by transforming a base density with parameterized diffeomorphisms conditioned on time.
The key benefit compared to methods relying on numerical ODE solvers or PINNs is that the analytic expression of the velocity is always consistent with changes in density.
Furthermore, we require neither expensive numerical solvers, nor additional penalties to enforce the PDE.
LFlows show higher predictive accuracy in density modeling tasks compared to competing models in 2D and 3D,
while being computationally efficient.
As a real-world application, we model bird migration based on sparse weather radar measurements. Fabricio Arend Torres, Marcello Massimo Negri, Marco Inversi, Jonathan Aellen, Volker Roth 0001 |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2021 | Sequential Gaussian Process Regression for Simultaneous Pathology Detection and Shape Reconstruction
Dana Rahbani, Andreas Morel-Forster, Dennis Madsen, Jonathan Aellen, Thomas Vetter |
MICCAI (5) | 4 |