Ionut-Vlad Modoranu

dblp:275/9983 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 67% Optimization for machine learning · 24% Deep learning architectures and training · 6%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
2.432025
Unified Scaling Laws for Compressed Representations · NeurIPS 2025
The Iterative Optimal Brain Surgeon: Faster Sparse Recovery by Leveraging Second-Order Information · NeurIPS 2024
MicroAdam: Accurate Adaptive Optimization with Low Space Overhead and Provable Convergence · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
adaptive optimization
1.622025
LDAdam: Adaptive Optimization from Low-Dimensional Gradient Statistics · ICLR 2025
MicroAdam: Accurate Adaptive Optimization with Low Space Overhead and Provable Convergence · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory-efficient training
1.622025
LDAdam: Adaptive Optimization from Low-Dimensional Gradient Statistics · ICLR 2025
Error Feedback Can Accurately Compress Preconditioners · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
large model training
0.912025
LDAdam: Adaptive Optimization from Low-Dimensional Gradient Statistics · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization › optimizer design
memory-efficient optimizer
0.912025
LDAdam: Adaptive Optimization from Low-Dimensional Gradient Statistics · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
quantization and sparsification
0.912025
Unified Scaling Laws for Compressed Representations · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws
0.912025
Unified Scaling Laws for Compressed Representations · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › communication compression
error-feedback compression
0.812024
Error Feedback Can Accurately Compress Preconditioners · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
gradient compression
0.812024
MicroAdam: Accurate Adaptive Optimization with Low Space Overhead and Provable Convergence · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
0.812024
The Iterative Optimal Brain Surgeon: Faster Sparse Recovery by Leveraging Second-Order Information · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
second-order optimization
0.812024
Error Feedback Can Accurately Compress Preconditioners · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
second-order pruning
0.812024
The Iterative Optimal Brain Surgeon: Faster Sparse Recovery by Leveraging Second-Order Information · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › gradient-based optimization
iterative hard thresholding
0.812024
The Iterative Optimal Brain Surgeon: Faster Sparse Recovery by Leveraging Second-Order Information · NeurIPS 2024
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
sparse recovery
0.812024
The Iterative Optimal Brain Surgeon: Faster Sparse Recovery by Leveraging Second-Order Information · NeurIPS 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack
0.512021
A Panda? No, It's a Sloth: Slowdown Attacks on Adaptive Multi-Exit Neural Network Inference · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › dynamic neural network
multi-exit network
0.112021
A Panda? No, It's a Sloth: Slowdown Attacks on Adaptive Multi-Exit Neural Network Inference · ICLR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

error feedback · 2.4optimal brain surgeon · 1.5iterative hard thresholding · 1.5curvature information · 1.5low-rank projection · 0.9gaussian mean squared error fitting · 0.9adaptive optimization · 0.9sparsification · 0.8low-rank compression · 0.8gradient compression · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 LDAdam: Adaptive Optimization from Low-Dimensional Gradient Statistics
abstract
We introduce LDAdam, a memory-efficient optimizer for training large models, that performs adaptive optimization steps within lower dimensional subspaces, while consistently exploring the full parameter space during training. This strategy keeps the optimizer's memory footprint to a fraction of the model size. LDAdam relies on a new projection-aware update rule for the optimizer states that allows for transitioning between subspaces, i.e., estimation of the statistics of the projected gradients. To mitigate the errors due to low-rank projection, LDAdam integrates a new generalized error feedback mechanism, which explicitly accounts for both gradient and optimizer state compression. We prove the convergence of LDAdam under standard assumptions, and provide empirical evidence that LDAdam allows for efficient fine-tuning and pre-training of language models.
Thomas Robert 0007, Mher Safaryan, Ionut-Vlad Modoranu, Dan Alistarh
ICLR3
2025 Unified Scaling Laws for Compressed Representations
abstract
Scaling laws have shaped recent advances in machine learning by enabling predictable scaling of model performance based on model size, computation, and data volume. Concurrently, the rise in computational cost for AI has motivated model compression techniques, notably quantization and sparsification, which have emerged to mitigate the steep computational demands associated with large-scale training and inference. This paper investigates the interplay between scaling laws and compression strategies, exploring whether a unified scaling framework can accurately predict model performance when training occurs over various compressed representations, such as sparse, scalar-quantized, sparse-quantized or even vector-quantized formats. Our key contributions include proposing and validating a general scaling law formulation applicable both individually but also composably across compression types. We demonstrate both theoretically and empirically that a simple metric based on Gaussian mean squared error fitting can robustly predict parameter efficiency across compressed models. Additionally, we extend our formulation to directly compare the accuracy potential of different compressed formats, and to derive better algorithms for training over sparse-quantized formats. Finally, we identify conditions under which these unified scaling laws fail.
Andrei Panferov, Alexandra Volkova, Ionut-Vlad Modoranu, Vage Egiazarian, Mher Safaryan, Dan Alistarh
NeurIPS3
2024 Error Feedback Can Accurately Compress Preconditioners
abstract
Leveraging second-order information about the loss at the scale of deep networks is one of the main lines of approach for improving the performance of current optimizers for deep learning. Yet, existing approaches for accurate full-matrix preconditioning, such as Full-Matrix Adagrad (GGT) or Matrix-Free Approximate Curvature (M-FAC) suffer from massive storage costs when applied even to small-scale models, as they must store a sliding window of gradients, whose memory requirements are multiplicative in the model dimension. In this paper, we address this issue via a novel and efficient error-feedback technique that can be applied to compress preconditioners by up to two orders of magnitude in practice, without loss of convergence. Specifically, our approach compresses the gradient information via sparsification or low-rank compression before it is fed into the preconditioner, feeding the compression error back into future iterations. Extensive experiments on deep neural networks show that this approach can compress full-matrix preconditioners to up to 99% sparsity without accuracy loss, effectively removing the memory overhead of fullmatrix preconditioners such as GGT and M-FAC.
Ionut-Vlad Modoranu, Aleksei Kalinov, Eldar Kurtic, Elias Frantar, Dan Alistarh
ICML1
2024 MicroAdam: Accurate Adaptive Optimization with Low Space Overhead and Provable Convergence
abstract
We propose a new variant of the Adam optimizer called MicroAdam that specifically minimizes memory overheads, while maintaining theoretical convergence guarantees. We achieve this by compressing the gradient information before it is fed into the optimizer state, thereby reducing its memory footprint significantly. We control the resulting compression error via a novel instance of the classical *error feedback* mechanism from distributed optimization in which *the error correction information is itself compressed* to allow for practical memory gains. We prove that the resulting approach maintains theoretical convergence guarantees competitive to those of AMSGrad, while providing good practical performance. Specifically, we show that MicroAdam can be implemented efficiently on GPUs: on both million-scale (BERT) and billion-scale (LLaMA) models, MicroAdam provides practical convergence competitive to that of the uncompressed Adam baseline, with lower memory usage and similar running time. Our code is available at https://github.com/IST-DASLab/MicroAdam.
Ionut-Vlad Modoranu, Mher Safaryan, Grigory Malinovsky, Eldar Kurtic, Thomas Robert 0007, Peter Richtárik, Dan Alistarh
NeurIPS1
2024 The Iterative Optimal Brain Surgeon: Faster Sparse Recovery by Leveraging Second-Order Information
abstract
The rising footprint of machine learning has led to a focus on imposing model sparsity as a means of reducing computational and memory costs. For deep neural networks (DNNs), the state-of-the-art accuracy-vs-sparsity is achieved by heuristics inspired by the classical Optimal Brain Surgeon (OBS) framework [LeCun et al., 1989, Hassibi and Stork, 1992, Hassibi et al., 1993], which leverages loss curvature information to make better pruning decisions. Yet, these results still lack a solid theoretical understanding, and it is unclear whether they can be improved by leveraging connections to the wealth of work on sparse recovery algorithms. In this paper, we draw new connections between these two areas and present new sparse recovery algorithms inspired by the OBS framework that come with theoretical guarantees under reasonable assumptions and have strong practical performance. Specifically, our work starts from the observation that we can leverage curvature information in OBS-like fashion upon the projection step of classic iterative sparse recovery algorithms such as IHT. We show for the first time that this leads both to improved convergence bounds in well-behaved settings and to stronger practical convergence. Furthermore, we present extensions of this approach to training accurate sparse DNNs, and validate it experimentally at scale.
Diyuan Wu, Ionut-Vlad Modoranu, Mher Safaryan, Denis Kuznedelev, Dan Alistarh
NeurIPS2
2021 A Panda? No, It's a Sloth: Slowdown Attacks on Adaptive Multi-Exit Neural Network Inference
Sanghyun Hong 0001, Yigitcan Kaya, Ionut-Vlad Modoranu, Tudor Dumitras
ICLR3