Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Liad Alfandari
dblp:276/0570
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-9202-3693ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
differential network analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Differential network analysis of multiple human tissue interactomes highlights tissue-selective processes and genetic disorder genes · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › computational genomics
disease gene prioritization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Differential network analysis of multiple human tissue interactomes highlights tissue-selective processes and genetic disorder genes · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network
network biology |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Differential network analysis of multiple human tissue interactomes highlights tissue-selective processes and genetic disorder genes · Bioinform. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interactome weighting · 0.4differential network analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Differential network analysis of multiple human tissue interactomes highlights tissue-selective processes and genetic disorder genesabstractMOTIVATION: Differential network analysis, designed to highlight network changes between conditions, is an important paradigm in network biology. However, differential network analysis methods have been typically designed to compare between two conditions and were rarely applied to multiple protein interaction networks (interactomes). Importantly, large-scale benchmarks for their evaluation have been lacking. RESULTS: Here, we present a framework for assessing the ability of differential network analysis of multiple human tissue interactomes to highlight tissue-selective processes and disorders. For this, we created a benchmark of 6499 curated tissue-specific Gene Ontology biological processes. We applied five methods, including four differential network analysis methods, to construct weighted interactomes for 34 tissues. Rigorous assessment of this benchmark revealed that differential analysis methods perform well in revealing tissue-selective processes (AUCs of 0.82-0.9). Next, we applied differential network analysis to illuminate the genes underlying tissue-selective hereditary disorders. For this, we curated a dataset of 1305 tissue-specific hereditary disorders and their manifesting tissues. Focusing on subnetworks containing the top 1% differential interactions in disease-relevant tissue interactomes revealed significant enrichment for disorder-causing genes in 18.6% of the cases, with a significantly high success rate for blood, nerve, muscle and heart diseases. SUMMARY: Altogether, we offer a framework that includes expansive manually curated datasets of tissue-selective processes and disorders to be used as benchmarks or to illuminate tissue-selective processes and genes. Our results demonstrate that differential analysis of multiple human tissue interactomes is a powerful tool for highlighting processes and genes with tissue-selective functionality and clinical impact. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Datasets are available as part of the Supplementary data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Omer Basha, Chanan M. Argov, Raviv Artzy, Yazeed Zoabi, Idan Hekselman, Liad Alfandari, Vered Chalifa-Caspi, Esti Yeger Lotem |
Bioinform. | 6 |