Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Isak Johansson-Åkhe
dblp:276/1325
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-1696-0183ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
model quality assessment |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | InterPepScore: a deep learning score for improving the FlexPepDock refinement protocol · Bioinform. 2022 InterPep2: global peptide-protein docking using interaction surface templates · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling › molecular docking
protein-peptide docking |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | InterPepScore: a deep learning score for improving the FlexPepDock refinement protocol · Bioinform. 2022 InterPep2: global peptide-protein docking using interaction surface templates · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | InterPepScore: a deep learning score for improving the FlexPepDock refinement protocol · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling › molecular docking
template-based docking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | InterPep2: global peptide-protein docking using interaction surface templates · Bioinform. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
monte carlo simulation · 0.6graph neural network · 0.6deep learning · 0.6template-based modeling · 0.4random forest · 0.4ab initio docking · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | InterPepScore: a deep learning score for improving the FlexPepDock refinement protocolabstractMOTIVATION: Interactions between peptide fragments and protein receptors are vital to cell function yet difficult to experimentally determine in structural details of. As such, many computational methods have been developed to aid in peptide-protein docking or structure prediction. One such method is Rosetta FlexPepDock which consistently refines coarse peptide-protein models into sub-Ångström precision using Monte-Carlo simulations and statistical potentials. Deep learning has recently seen increased use in protein structure prediction, with graph neural networks used for protein model quality assessment. RESULTS: Here, we introduce a graph neural network, InterPepScore, as an additional scoring term to complement and improve the Rosetta FlexPepDock refinement protocol. InterPepScore is trained on simulation trajectories from FlexPepDock refinement starting from thousands of peptide-protein complexes generated by a wide variety of docking schemes. The addition of InterPepScore into the refinement protocol consistently improves the quality of models created, and on an independent benchmark on 109 peptide-protein complexes its inclusion results in an increase in the number of complexes for which the top-scoring model had a DockQ-score of 0.49 (Medium quality) or better from 14.8% to 26.1%. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: InterPepScore is available online at http://wallnerlab.org/InterPepScore. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Isak Johansson-Åkhe, Björn Wallner |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2020 | InterPep2: global peptide-protein docking using interaction surface templatesabstractMOTIVATION: Interactions between proteins and peptides or peptide-like intrinsically disordered regions are involved in many important biological processes, such as gene expression and cell life-cycle regulation. Experimentally determining the structure of such interactions is time-consuming and difficult because of the inherent flexibility of the peptide ligand. Although several prediction-methods exist, most are limited in performance or availability. RESULTS: InterPep2 is a freely available method for predicting the structure of peptide-protein interactions. Improved performance is obtained by using templates from both peptide-protein and regular protein-protein interactions, and by a random forest trained to predict the DockQ-score for a given template using sequence and structural features. When tested on 252 bound peptide-protein complexes from structures deposited after the complexes used in the construction of the training and templates sets of InterPep2, InterPep2-Refined correctly positioned 67 peptides within 4.0 Å LRMSD among top10, similar to another state-of-the-art template-based method which positioned 54 peptides correctly. However, InterPep2 displays a superior ability to evaluate the quality of its own predictions. On a previously established set of 27 non-redundant unbound-to-bound peptide-protein complexes, InterPep2 performs on-par with leading methods. The extended InterPep2-Refined protocol managed to correctly model 15 of these complexes within 4.0 Å LRMSD among top10, without using templates from homologs. In addition, combining the template-based predictions from InterPep2 with ab initio predictions from PIPER-FlexPepDock resulted in 22% more near-native predictions compared to the best single method (22 versus 18). AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The program is available from: http://wallnerlab.org/InterPep2. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Isak Johansson-Åkhe, Claudio Mirabello, Björn Wallner |
Bioinform. | 1 |