Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Linhang Cai
dblp:276/6646
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 51% Representation and self-supervised learning · 27% Image recognition and object detection · 14% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | MixSKD: Self-Knowledge Distillation from Mixup for Image Recognition · ECCV (24) 2022 Hierarchical Self-supervised Augmented Knowledge Distillation · IJCAI 2021 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.9 | 3 | 2022 | MixSKD: Self-Knowledge Distillation from Mixup for Image Recognition · ECCV (24) 2022 Mutual Contrastive Learning for Visual Representation Learning · AAAI 2022 Prior Gradient Mask Guided Pruning-Aware Fine-Tuning · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Mutual Contrastive Learning for Visual Representation Learning · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Prior Gradient Mask Guided Pruning-Aware Fine-Tuning · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
mutual contrastive learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Mutual Contrastive Learning for Visual Representation Learning · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Prior Gradient Mask Guided Pruning-Aware Fine-Tuning · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
self-distillation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | MixSKD: Self-Knowledge Distillation from Mixup for Image Recognition · ECCV (24) 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Mutual Contrastive Learning for Visual Representation Learning · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › multi-task learning
auxiliary task learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Hierarchical Self-supervised Augmented Knowledge Distillation · IJCAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
self-supervised distillation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Hierarchical Self-supervised Augmented Knowledge Distillation · IJCAI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
knowledge distillation · 1.1mutual information maximization · 0.6mixup · 0.6interactive contrastive learning · 0.6gradient masking · 0.6channel-wise dropout · 0.6hierarchical feature transfer · 0.5contrastive learning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Knowledge Distillation Using Hierarchical Self-Supervision Augmented DistributionabstractKnowledge distillation (KD) is an effective framework that aims to transfer meaningful information from a large teacher to a smaller student. Generally, KD often involves how to define and transfer knowledge. Previous KD methods often focus on mining various forms of knowledge, for example, feature maps and refined information. However, the knowledge is derived from the primary supervised task, and thus, is highly task-specific. Motivated by the recent success of self-supervised representation learning, we propose an auxiliary self-supervision augmented task to guide networks to learn more meaningful features. Therefore, we can derive soft self-supervision augmented distributions as richer dark knowledge from this task for KD. Unlike previous knowledge, this distribution encodes joint knowledge from supervised and self-supervised feature learning. Beyond knowledge exploration, we propose to append several auxiliary branches at various hidden layers, to fully take advantage of hierarchical feature maps. Each auxiliary branch is guided to learn self-supervision augmented tasks and distill this distribution from teacher to student. Overall, we call our KD method a hierarchical self-supervision augmented KD (HSSAKD). Experiments on standard image classification show that both offline and online HSSAKD achieves state-of-the-art performance in the field of KD. Further transfer experiments on object detection further verify that HSSAKD can guide the network to learn better features. The code is available at https://github.com/winycg/HSAKD. Chuanguang Yang, Zhulin An, Linhang Cai, Yongjun Xu 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. | 3 |
| 2022 | Prior Gradient Mask Guided Pruning-Aware Fine-TuningabstractWe proposed a Prior Gradient Mask Guided Pruning-aware Fine-Tuning (PGMPF) framework to accelerate deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). In detail, the proposed PGMPF selectively suppresses the gradient of those ”unimportant” parameters via a prior gradient mask generated by the pruning criterion during fine-tuning. PGMPF has three charming characteristics over previous works: (1) Pruning-aware network fine-tuning. A typical pruning pipeline consists of training, pruning and fine-tuning, which are relatively independent, while PGMPF utilizes a variant of the pruning mask as a prior gradient mask to guide fine-tuning, without complicated pruning criteria. (2) An excellent tradeoff between large model capacity during fine-tuning and stable convergence speed to obtain the final compact model. Previous works preserve more training information of pruned parameters during fine-tuning to pursue better performance, which would incur catastrophic non-convergence of the pruned model for relatively large pruning rates, while our PGMPF greatly stabilizes the fine-tuning phase by gradually constraining the learning rate of those ”unimportant” parameters. (3) Channel-wise random dropout of the prior gradient mask to impose some gradient noise to fine-tuning to further improve the robustness of final compact model. Experimental results on three image classification benchmarks CIFAR10/ 100 and ILSVRC-2012 demonstrate the effectiveness of our method for various CNN architectures, datasets and pruning rates. Notably, on ILSVRC-2012, PGMPF reduces 53.5% FLOPs on ResNet-50 with only 0.90% top-1 accuracy drop and 0.52% top-5 accuracy drop, which has advanced the state-of-the-art with negligible extra computational cost. Linhang Cai, Zhulin An, Chuanguang Yang, Yangchun Yan, Yongjun Xu 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2022 | Mutual Contrastive Learning for Visual Representation LearningabstractWe present a collaborative learning method called Mutual Contrastive Learning (MCL) for general visual representation learning. The core idea of MCL is to perform mutual interaction and transfer of contrastive distributions among a cohort of networks. A crucial component of MCL is Interactive Contrastive Learning (ICL). Compared with vanilla contrastive learning, ICL can aggregate cross-network embedding information and maximize the lower bound to the mutual information between two networks. This enables each network to learn extra contrastive knowledge from others, leading to better feature representations for visual recognition tasks. We emphasize that the resulting MCL is conceptually simple yet empirically powerful. It is a generic framework that can be applied to both supervised and self-supervised representation learning. Experimental results on image classification and transfer learning to object detection show that MCL can lead to consistent performance gains, demonstrating that MCL can guide the network to generate better feature representations. Code is available at https://github.com/winycg/MCL. Chuanguang Yang, Zhulin An, Linhang Cai, Yongjun Xu 0001 |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2022 | MixSKD: Self-Knowledge Distillation from Mixup for Image Recognition
Chuanguang Yang, Zhulin An, Helong Zhou, Linhang Cai, Xiang Zhi, Jiwen Wu, Yongjun Xu 0001, Qian Zhang 0009 |
ECCV (24) | 4 |
| 2021 | Hierarchical Self-supervised Augmented Knowledge DistillationabstractKnowledge distillation often involves how to define and transfer knowledge from teacher to student effectively. Although recent self-supervised contrastive knowledge achieves the best performance, forcing the network to learn such knowledge may damage the representation learning of the original class recognition task. We therefore adopt an alternative self-supervised augmented task to guide the network to learn the joint distribution of the original recognition task and self-supervised auxiliary task. It is demonstrated as a richer knowledge to improve the representation power without losing the normal classification capability. Moreover, it is incomplete that previous methods only transfer the probabilistic knowledge between the final layers. We propose to append several auxiliary classifiers to hierarchical intermediate feature maps to generate diverse self-supervised knowledge and perform the one-to-one transfer to teach the student network thoroughly. Our method significantly surpasses the previous SOTA SSKD with an average improvement of 2.56% on CIFAR-100 and an improvement of 0.77% on ImageNet across widely used network pairs. Codes are available at https://github.com/winycg/HSAKD. Chuanguang Yang, Zhulin An, Linhang Cai, Yongjun Xu 0001 |
IJCAI | 3 |
| 2021 | Soft and Hard Filter Pruning via Dimension ReductionabstractFilter pruning is widely used to reduce the computation of deep learning, enabling the deployment of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) in resource-limited devices. Conventional Hard Filter Pruning (HFP) method zeroizes pruned filters and stops updating them, thus reducing the search space of the model. On the contrary, Soft Filter Pruning (SFP) simply zeroizes pruned filters, keeping updating them in the following training epochs, thus maintaining the capacity of the network. However, SFP, together with its variants, converges much slower than HFP due to its larger search space. Firstly, we generalize SFP-based methods and HFP to analyze their characteristics. Then we propose a Gradually Hard Filter Pruning (GHFP) method to smoothly switch from SFP-based methods to HFP during training and pruning, thus maintaining a large search space at first, gradually reducing the capacity of the model to ensure a moderate convergence speed. Furthermore, we view filter pruning as dimension reduction and propose a novel dimension reduction block integrated into GHFP to significantly outperform other methods by a moderate margin. Linhang Cai, Zhulin An, Chuanguang Yang, Yongjun Xu 0001 |
IJCNN | 1 |
| 2020 | Softer Pruning, Incremental RegularizationabstractNetwork pruning is widely used to compress Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). The Soft Filter Pruning (SFP) method zeroizes the pruned filters during training while updating them in the next training epoch. Thus the trained information of the pruned filters is completely dropped. To utilize the trained pruned filters, we proposed a SofteR Filter Pruning (SRFP) method and its variant, Asymptotic SofteR Filter Pruning (ASRFP), simply decaying the pruned weights with a monotonic decreasing parameter. Our methods perform well across various networks, datasets and pruning rates, also transferable to weight pruning. On ILSVRC-2012, ASRFP prunes 40% of the parameters on ResNet-34 with 1.63% top-1 and 0.68% top-5 accuracy improvement. In theory, SRFP and ASRFP are an incremental regularization of the pruned filters. Besides, We note that SRFP and ASRFP pursue better results while slowing down the speed of convergence. Linhang Cai, Zhulin An, Chuanguang Yang, Yongjun Xu 0001 |
ICPR | 1 |