Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Qinyuan Wu

dblp:277/0677 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-1453-9643ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 64% Learning theory · 16% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 16%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
1.322026
Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning in Large Language Models: A Formal Language Learning Perspective · ACL (1) 2026
Towards Reliable Latent Knowledge Estimation in LLMs: Zero-Prompt Many-Shot Based Factual Knowledge Extraction · WSDM 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
1.012026
Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning in Large Language Models: A Formal Language Learning Perspective · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory › inductive inference
formal language learning
1.012026
Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning in Large Language Models: A Formal Language Learning Perspective · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
1.012026
The Algorithmic Self-Portrait: Deconstructing Memory in ChatGPT · WWW 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
memory
1.012026
The Algorithmic Self-Portrait: Deconstructing Memory in ChatGPT · WWW 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312026
The Algorithmic Self-Portrait: Deconstructing Memory in ChatGPT · WWW 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

formal language theory · 1.0zero-prompt probing · 0.9in-context learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning in Large Language Models: A Formal Language Learning Perspective
abstract
Bishwamittra Ghosh, Soumi Das, Till Speicher, Qinyuan Wu, Mohammad Aflah Khan, Deepak Garg, Krishna P. Gummadi, Evimaria Terzi. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Bishwamittra Ghosh, Soumi Das, Till Speicher, Qinyuan Wu, Mohammad Aflah Khan, Krishna P. Gummadi, Evimaria Terzi
ACL (1)4
2026 The Algorithmic Self-Portrait: Deconstructing Memory in ChatGPT
Abhisek Dash, Soumi Das, Elisabeth Kirsten, Qinyuan Wu, Sai Keerthana Karnam, Krishna P. Gummadi, Thorsten Holz, Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Savvas Zannettou
WWW4
2025 Towards Reliable Latent Knowledge Estimation in LLMs: Zero-Prompt Many-Shot Based Factual Knowledge Extraction
abstract
In this paper, we focus on the challenging task of reliably estimating factual knowledge that is embedded inside large language models (LLMs). To avoid reliability concerns with prior approaches, we propose to eliminate prompt engineering when probing LLMs for factual knowledge. Our approach, called Zero-Prompt Latent Knowledge Estimator (ZP-LKE), leverages the in-context learning ability of LLMs to communicate both the factual knowledge question as well as the expected answer format. Our knowledge estimator is both conceptually simpler (i.e., doesn't depend on meta-linguistic judgments of LLMs) and easier to apply (i.e., is not LLM-specific), and we demonstrate that it can surface more of the latent knowledge embedded in LLMs. We also investigate how different design choices affect the performance of ZP-LKE. Using the proposed estimator, we perform a large-scale evaluation of the factual knowledge of a variety of open-source LLMs, like OPT, Pythia, Llama(2), Mistral, Gemma, etc. over a large set of relations and facts from the Wikidata knowledge base. We observe differences in the factual knowledge between different model families and models of different sizes, that some relations are consistently better known than others but that models differ in the precise facts they know, and differences in the knowledge of base models and their finetuned counterparts. Code available at: https://github.com/QinyuanWu0710/ZeroPrompt_LKE
Qinyuan Wu, Mohammad Aflah Khan, Soumi Das, Vedant Nanda, Bishwamittra Ghosh, Camila Kolling, Till Speicher, Laurent Bindschaedler, Krishna P. Gummadi, Evimaria Terzi
WSDM1
2022 Exponential negation of a probability distribution
Qinyuan Wu, Yong Deng 0001, Naixue Xiong
Soft Comput.1