Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Claudia Chu

dblp:277/1069 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0009-0005-3052-4555ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › read mapping
long-read mapping
0.412020
Weighted minimizer sampling improves long read mapping · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
read mapping
0.412020
Weighted minimizer sampling improves long read mapping · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequence comparison
0.412020
Weighted minimizer sampling improves long read mapping · Bioinform. 2020
Algorithms and data structures
sketching
0.412020
Weighted minimizer sampling improves long read mapping · Bioinform. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weighted sampling · 0.9k-mer weighting · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Weighted minimizer sampling improves long read mapping
abstract
MOTIVATION: In this era of exponential data growth, minimizer sampling has become a standard algorithmic technique for rapid genome sequence comparison. This technique yields a sub-linear representation of sequences, enabling their comparison in reduced space and time. A key property of the minimizer technique is that if two sequences share a substring of a specified length, then they can be guaranteed to have a matching minimizer. However, because the k-mer distribution in eukaryotic genomes is highly uneven, minimizer-based tools (e.g. Minimap2, Mashmap) opt to discard the most frequently occurring minimizers from the genome to avoid excessive false positives. By doing so, the underlying guarantee is lost and accuracy is reduced in repetitive genomic regions. RESULTS: We introduce a novel weighted-minimizer sampling algorithm. A unique feature of the proposed algorithm is that it performs minimizer sampling while considering a weight for each k-mer; i.e. the higher the weight of a k-mer, the more likely it is to be selected. By down-weighting frequently occurring k-mers, we are able to meet both objectives: (i) avoid excessive false-positive matches and (ii) maintain the minimizer match guarantee. We tested our algorithm, Winnowmap, using both simulated and real long-read data and compared it to a state-of-the-art long read mapper, Minimap2. Our results demonstrate a reduction in the mapping error-rate from 0.14% to 0.06% in the recently finished human X chromosome (154.3 Mbp), and from 3.6% to 0% within the highly repetitive X centromere (3.1 Mbp). Winnowmap improves mapping accuracy within repeats and achieves these results with sparser sampling, leading to better index compression and competitive runtimes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Winnowmap is built on top of the Minimap2 codebase and is available at https://github.com/marbl/winnowmap.
Arang Rhie, Claudia Chu, Brian Walenz, Sergey Koren, Adam M. Phillippy
Bioinform.4