Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yusong Zhu

dblp:277/3261 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 66% Learning theory · 34%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 50% Mathematical optimization · 50%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
1.012026
Separating Oblivious and Adaptive Models of Variable Selection (Extended Abstract) · COLT 2026
Mathematical optimization › sparse learning
feature selection
1.012026
Separating Oblivious and Adaptive Models of Variable Selection (Extended Abstract) · COLT 2026
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
sparse recovery
1.012026
Separating Oblivious and Adaptive Models of Variable Selection (Extended Abstract) · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional statistics
0.912025
Spike-and-Slab Posterior Sampling in High Dimensions · COLT 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
posterior sampling
0.912025
Spike-and-Slab Posterior Sampling in High Dimensions · COLT 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.712023
Fast Conditional Mixing of MCMC Algorithms for Non-log-concave Distributions · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › markov chain
mixing rate
0.712023
Fast Conditional Mixing of MCMC Algorithms for Non-log-concave Distributions · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
non-log-concave sampling
0.712023
Fast Conditional Mixing of MCMC Algorithms for Non-log-concave Distributions · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse recovery · 2.0l-infinity error · 2.0restricted isometry property · 0.9polynomial-time sampling · 0.9poincaré inequality · 0.7gibbs sampling · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Separating Oblivious and Adaptive Models of Variable Selection (Extended Abstract)
abstract
Sparse recovery is among the most well-studied problems in learning theory and high-dimensional statistics. In this work, we investigate the statistical and computational landscapes of sparse recovery with $\ell_\infty$ error guarantees. This variant of the problem is motivated by \emph{variable selection} tasks, where the goal is to estimate the support of a $k$-sparse signal in $\R^d$. Our main contribution is a provable separation between the \emph{oblivious} (“for each”) and \emph{adaptive} (“for all”) models of $\ell_\infty$ sparse recovery. We show that under an oblivious model, the optimal $\ell_\infty$ error is attainable in near-linear time with $\approx k\log d$ samples, whereas in an adaptive model, $\gtrsim k^2$ samples are necessary for any algorithm to achieve this bound. This establishes a surprising contrast with the standard $\ell_2$ setting, where $\approx k \log d$ samples suffice even for adaptive sparse recovery. We conclude with a preliminary examination of a \emph{partially-adaptive} model, where we show nontrivial variable selection guarantees are possible with $\approx k\log d$ measurements.
Ziyun Chen 0001, Jerry Li 0001, Kevin Tian, Yusong Zhu
COLT4
2025 Spike-and-Slab Posterior Sampling in High Dimensions
abstract
Posterior sampling with the spike-and-slab prior (Mitchell and Beauchamp, 1988), a popular multi-modal distribution used to model uncertainty in variable selection, is considered the theoretical gold standard method for Bayesian sparse linear regression (Carvalho et al., 2009; Rockova, 2018). However, designing provable algorithms for performing this sampling task is notoriously challenging. Existing posterior samplers for Bayesian sparse variable selection tasks either require strong assumptions about the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (Yang et al., 2016), only work when the measurement count grows at least linearly in the dimension (Montanari and Wu, 2024), or rely on heuristic approximations to the posterior. We give the first provable algorithms for spike-and-slab posterior sampling that apply for any SNR, and use a measurement count sublinear in the problem dimension. Concretely, assume we are given a measurement matrix $X \in \R^{n \times d}$ and noisy observations $y = X\theta^\star + \xi$ of a signal $\theta^\star$ drawn from a spike-and-slab prior $\pi$ with a Gaussian diffuse density and expected sparsity $k$, where $\xi \sim \mathcal{N}(0_d, \sigma^2 I_n)$. We give a polynomial-time high-accuracy sampler for the posterior $\pi(\cdot \mid X, y)$, for any SNR $\sigma^{-1} > 0$, as long as $n \geq k^3 \cdot \text{polylog}(d)$ and $X$ is drawn from a matrix ensemble satisfying the restricted isometry property. We further give a sampler that runs in near-linear time $\approx nd$ in the same setting, as long as $n \geq k^5 \cdot \text{polylog}(d)$. To demonstrate the flexibility of our framework, we extend our result to spike-and-slab posterior sampling with Laplace diffuse densities, achieving similar guarantees when $\sigma = O(\frac{1}{k})$ is bounded.
Symantak Kumar, Purnamrita Sarkar, Kevin Tian, Yusong Zhu
COLT4
2023 Fast Conditional Mixing of MCMC Algorithms for Non-log-concave Distributions
abstract
MCMC algorithms offer empirically efficient tools for sampling from a target distribution $\pi(x) \propto \exp(-V(x))$. However, on the theory side, MCMC algorithms suffer from slow mixing rate when $\pi(x)$ is non-log-concave. Our work examines this gap and shows that when Poincar\'e-style inequality holds on a subset $\mathcal{X}$ of the state space, the conditional distribution of MCMC iterates over $\mathcal{X}$ mixes fast to the true conditional distribution. This fast mixing guarantee can hold in cases when global mixing is provably slow. We formalize the statement and quantify the conditional mixing rate. We further show that conditional mixing can have interesting implications for sampling from mixtures of Gaussians, parameter estimation for Gaussian mixture models, and Gibbs-sampling with well-connected local minima.
Jingzhao Zhang, Yusong Zhu
NeurIPS4