Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Devang Agrawal

dblp:277/5062 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 38% Language models and text generation · 22% Time series and sequential data · 10%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning › pre-trained model continual learning
continual learning for language models
0.512021
Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.512021
Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain shift
temporal distribution shift
0.512021
Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
temporal generalization
0.512021
Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue understanding
conversational semantic parsing
0.412020
Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › task-oriented dialogue
dialogue state tracking
0.412020
Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing
0.412020
Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue
0.412020
Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020
Information retrieval › evaluation › benchmark
benchmark construction
0.112021
Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval-augmented question answering · 1.1parametric fine-tuning · 1.1streaming evaluation · 1.0Transformer-XL · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 StreamingQA: A Benchmark for Adaptation to New Knowledge over Time in Question Answering Models
abstract
Knowledge and language understanding of models evaluated through question answering (QA) has been usually studied on static snapshots of knowledge, like Wikipedia. However, our world is dynamic, evolves over time, and our models’ knowledge becomes outdated. To study how semi-parametric QA models and their underlying parametric language models (LMs) adapt to evolving knowledge, we construct a new large-scale dataset, StreamingQA, with human written and generated questions asked on a given date, to be answered from 14 years of time-stamped news articles. We evaluate our models quarterly as they read new articles not seen in pre-training. We show that parametric models can be updated without full retraining, while avoiding catastrophic forgetting. For semi-parametric models, adding new articles into the search space allows for rapid adaptation, however, models with an outdated underlying LM under-perform those with a retrained LM. For questions about higher-frequency named entities, parametric updates are particularly beneficial. In our dynamic world, the StreamingQA dataset enables a more realistic evaluation of QA models, and our experiments highlight several promising directions for future research.
Adam Liska, Tomás Kociský, Elena Gribovskaya, Tayfun Terzi, Eren Sezener, Devang Agrawal, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Tim Scholtes, Manzil Zaheer, Susannah Young, Ellen Gilsenan-McMahon, Sophia Austin, Phil Blunsom, Angeliki Lazaridou
ICML6
2021 Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models
abstract
Our world is open-ended, non-stationary, and constantly evolving; thus what we talk about and how we talk about it change over time. This inherent dynamic nature of language contrasts with the current static language modelling paradigm, which trains and evaluates models on utterances from overlapping time periods. Despite impressive recent progress, we demonstrate that Transformer-XL language models perform worse in the realistic setup of predicting future utterances from beyond their training period, and that model performance becomes increasingly worse with time. We find that, while increasing model size alone—a key driver behind recent progress—does not solve this problem, having models that continually update their knowledge with new information can indeed mitigate this performance degradation over time. Hence, given the compilation of ever-larger language modelling datasets, combined with the growing list of language-model-based NLP applications that require up-to-date factual knowledge about the world, we argue that now is the right time to rethink the static way in which we currently train and evaluate our language models, and develop adaptive language models that can remain up-to-date with respect to our ever-changing and non-stationary world. We publicly release our dynamic, streaming language modelling benchmarks for WMT and arXiv to facilitate language model evaluation that takes temporal dynamics into account.
Angeliki Lazaridou, Adhiguna Kuncoro, Elena Gribovskaya, Devang Agrawal, Adam Liska, Tayfun Terzi, Mai Gimenez, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Tomás Kociský, Sebastian Ruder, Dani Yogatama, Kris Cao, Susannah Young, Phil Blunsom
NeurIPS4
2020 Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking
abstract
Jianpeng Cheng, Devang Agrawal, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Shruti Bhargava, Joris Driesen, Federico Flego, Dain Kaplan, Dimitri Kartsaklis, Lin Li, Dhivya Piraviperumal, Jason D. Williams, Hong Yu, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anders Johannsen. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020.
Jianpeng Cheng 0002, Devang Agrawal, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Shruti Bhargava, Joris Driesen, Federico Flego, Dain Kaplan, Dimitri Kartsaklis, Dhivya Piraviperumal, Jason D. Williams, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anders Johannsen
EMNLP (1)2