Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Devang Agrawal
dblp:277/5062
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 38% Language models and text generation · 22% Time series and sequential data · 10% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning › pre-trained model continual learning
continual learning for language models |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain shift
temporal distribution shift |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
temporal generalization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue understanding
conversational semantic parsing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › task-oriented dialogue
dialogue state tracking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State Tracking · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › benchmark
benchmark construction |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented question answering · 1.1parametric fine-tuning · 1.1streaming evaluation · 1.0Transformer-XL · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | StreamingQA: A Benchmark for Adaptation to New Knowledge over Time in Question Answering ModelsabstractKnowledge and language understanding of models evaluated through question answering (QA) has been usually studied on static snapshots of knowledge, like Wikipedia. However, our world is dynamic, evolves over time, and our models’ knowledge becomes outdated. To study how semi-parametric QA models and their underlying parametric language models (LMs) adapt to evolving knowledge, we construct a new large-scale dataset, StreamingQA, with human written and generated questions asked on a given date, to be answered from 14 years of time-stamped news articles. We evaluate our models quarterly as they read new articles not seen in pre-training. We show that parametric models can be updated without full retraining, while avoiding catastrophic forgetting. For semi-parametric models, adding new articles into the search space allows for rapid adaptation, however, models with an outdated underlying LM under-perform those with a retrained LM. For questions about higher-frequency named entities, parametric updates are particularly beneficial. In our dynamic world, the StreamingQA dataset enables a more realistic evaluation of QA models, and our experiments highlight several promising directions for future research. Adam Liska, Tomás Kociský, Elena Gribovskaya, Tayfun Terzi, Eren Sezener, Devang Agrawal, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Tim Scholtes, Manzil Zaheer, Susannah Young, Ellen Gilsenan-McMahon, Sophia Austin, Phil Blunsom, Angeliki Lazaridou |
ICML | 6 |
| 2021 | Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language ModelsabstractOur world is open-ended, non-stationary, and constantly evolving; thus what we talk about and how we talk about it change over time. This inherent dynamic nature of language contrasts with the current static language modelling paradigm, which trains and evaluates models on utterances from overlapping time periods. Despite impressive recent progress, we demonstrate that Transformer-XL language models perform worse in the realistic setup of predicting future utterances from beyond their training period, and that model performance becomes increasingly worse with time. We find that, while increasing model size alone—a key driver behind recent progress—does not solve this problem, having models that continually update their knowledge with new information can indeed mitigate this performance degradation over time. Hence, given the compilation of ever-larger language modelling datasets, combined with the growing list of language-model-based NLP applications that require up-to-date factual knowledge about the world, we argue that now is the right time to rethink the static way in which we currently train and evaluate our language models, and develop adaptive language models that can remain up-to-date with respect to our ever-changing and non-stationary world. We publicly release our dynamic, streaming language modelling benchmarks for WMT and arXiv to facilitate language model evaluation that takes temporal dynamics into account. Angeliki Lazaridou, Adhiguna Kuncoro, Elena Gribovskaya, Devang Agrawal, Adam Liska, Tayfun Terzi, Mai Gimenez, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Tomás Kociský, Sebastian Ruder, Dani Yogatama, Kris Cao, Susannah Young, Phil Blunsom |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2020 | Conversational Semantic Parsing for Dialog State TrackingabstractJianpeng Cheng, Devang Agrawal, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Shruti Bhargava, Joris Driesen, Federico Flego, Dain Kaplan, Dimitri Kartsaklis, Lin Li, Dhivya Piraviperumal, Jason D. Williams, Hong Yu, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anders Johannsen. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020. Jianpeng Cheng 0002, Devang Agrawal, Héctor Martínez Alonso, Shruti Bhargava, Joris Driesen, Federico Flego, Dain Kaplan, Dimitri Kartsaklis, Dhivya Piraviperumal, Jason D. Williams, Diarmuid Ó Séaghdha, Anders Johannsen |
EMNLP (1) | 2 |