Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ruangrawee Kitichotkul
dblp:277/5948
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-8084-0071ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Computational photography and imaging · 50% Image and video processing · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Free-Running vs. Synchronous: Single-Photon Lidar for High-Flux 3D Imaging · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Free-Running vs. Synchronous: Single-Photon Lidar for High-Flux 3D Imaging · ICCV 2025 |
Image and video processing
image reconstruction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Image Reconstruction from Readout-Multiplexed Single-Photon Detector Arrays · CVPR 2025 |
Computational photography and imaging
single-photon imaging |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Image Reconstruction from Readout-Multiplexed Single-Photon Detector Arrays · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regularization · 1.7maximum likelihood estimation · 1.7learned point cloud score model · 1.7monte carlo simulation · 0.9inverse imaging · 0.9cramér-rao bound · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Image Reconstruction from Readout-Multiplexed Single-Photon Detector ArraysabstractReadout multiplexing is a promising solution to overcome hardware limitations and data bottlenecks in imaging with single-photon detectors. Conventional multiplexed readout processing creates an upper bound on photon counts at a very fine time scale, where frames with multiple detected photons must either be discarded or allowed to introduce significant bias. We formulate multiphoton coincidence resolution as an inverse imaging problem and introduce a solution framework to probabilistically resolve the spatial locations of photon incidences. Specifically, we develop a theoretical abstraction of row–column multiplexing and a model of photon events that make readouts ambiguous. Using this, we propose a novel estimator that spatially resolves up to four coincident photons. Monte Carlo simulations show that our proposed method increases the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) of reconstruction by 3 to 4 dB compared to conventional methods under optimal incident flux conditions. Additionally, this method reduces the required number of readout frames to achieve the same mean-squared error as other methods by a factor of ~ 4. Finally, our method matches the Cramér–Rao bound for detection probability estimation for a wider range of incident flux values compared to conventional methods. While demonstrated for a specific detector type and readout architecture, this method can be extended to more general multiplexing with different detector models. Shashwath Bharadwaj, Ruangrawee Kitichotkul, Akshay Agarwal 0003, Vivek K. Goyal |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2025 | Doppler Single-Photon LidarabstractSingle-photon lidar (SPL) can achieve high-accuracy, lowlight ranging; however, velocity estimation typically requires regression over multiple distance measurements. Here, we introduce Doppler SPL, which enables joint instantaneous velocity and range estimation. First, we derive a measurement model for SPL, showing that a target moving at a constant velocity introduces a Doppler shift into the sequence of photon detection times. We then introduce estimators for range and velocity based on Fourier analysis of the detection time sequence. Simulations show improved accuracy of our method over baseline approaches, and we further validate our approach on experimental SPL data for a moving target. Ruangrawee Kitichotkul, Joshua Rapp, Yanting Ma, Hassan Mansour |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2025 | Free-Running vs. Synchronous: Single-Photon Lidar for High-Flux 3D ImagingabstractConventional wisdom suggests that single-photon lidar (SPL) should operate in low-light conditions to minimize dead-time effects. Many methods have been developed to mitigate these effects in synchronous SPL systems. However, solutions for free-running SPL remain limited despite the advantage of reduced histogram distortion from dead times. To improve the accuracy of free-running SPL, we propose a computationally efficient joint maximum likelihood estimator of the signal flux, the background flux, and the depth using only histograms, along with a complementary regularization framework that incorporates a learned point cloud score model as a prior. Simulations and experiments demonstrate that free-running SPL yields lower estimation errors than its synchronous counterpart under identical conditions, with our regularization further improving accuracy. Ruangrawee Kitichotkul, Shashwath Bharadwaj, Joshua Rapp, Yanting Ma, Alexander Mehta, Vivek K. Goyal |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2021 | Suremap: Predicting Uncertainty in Cnn-Based Image Reconstructions Using Stein's Unbiased Risk EstimateabstractConvolutional neural networks (CNN) have emerged as a powerful tool for solving computational imaging reconstruction problems. However, CNNs are generally difficult-to-understand black-boxes. Accordingly, it is challenging to know when they will work and, more importantly, when they will fail. This limitation is a major barrier to their use in safety-critical applications like medical imaging: Is that blob in the reconstruction an artifact or a tumor?In this work we use Stein’s unbiased risk estimate (SURE) to develop per-pixel confidence intervals, in the form of heatmaps, for compressive sensing reconstruction using the approximate message passing (AMP) framework with CNN-based denoisers. These heatmaps tell end-users how much to trust an image formed by a CNN, which could greatly improve the utility of CNNs in various computational imaging applications. Ruangrawee Kitichotkul, Christopher A. Metzler, Frank Ong, Gordon Wetzstein |
ICASSP | 1 |