VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Iskander Azangulov
dblp:277/6038
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 23% Graph learning · 20% Generative modeling · 11% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
1.8 | 3 | 2025 | Stationary Kernels and Gaussian Processes on Lie Groups and their Homogeneous Spaces II: non-compact symmetric spaces · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Stationary Kernels and Gaussian Processes on Lie Groups and their Homogeneous Spaces I: the compact case · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 The GeometricKernels Package: Heat and Matérn Kernels for Geometric Learning on Manifolds, Meshes, and Graphs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
non-euclidean domains |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Stationary Kernels and Gaussian Processes on Lie Groups and their Homogeneous Spaces II: non-compact symmetric spaces · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Stationary Kernels and Gaussian Processes on Lie Groups and their Homogeneous Spaces I: the compact case · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Linear Convergence of Diffusion Models Under the Manifold Hypothesis · COLT 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Linear Convergence of Diffusion Models Under the Manifold Hypothesis · COLT 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning
intrinsic dimension |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Linear Convergence of Diffusion Models Under the Manifold Hypothesis · COLT 2025 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | The GeometricKernels Package: Heat and Matérn Kernels for Geometric Learning on Manifolds, Meshes, and Graphs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › inductive bias
manifold hypothesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Linear Convergence of Diffusion Models Under the Manifold Hypothesis · COLT 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
covariance kernel construction · 1.5bayesian learning · 1.5score matching · 0.9backward SDE · 0.9KL divergence analysis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Linear Convergence of Diffusion Models Under the Manifold HypothesisabstractScore-matching generative models have proven successful at sampling from complex high-dimensional data distributions. In many applications, this distribution is believed to concentrate on a much lower $d$-dimensional manifold embedded into $D$-dimensional space; this is known as the manifold hypothesis. The current best-known convergence guarantees are either linear in $D$ or polynomial (superlinear) in $d$. The latter exploits a novel integration scheme for the backward SDE. We take the best of both worlds and show that the number of steps diffusion models require in order to converge in Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence is linear (up to logarithmic terms) in the intrinsic dimension $d$. Moreover, we show that this linear dependency is sharp. Peter Potaptchik, Iskander Azangulov, George Deligiannidis |
COLT | 2 |
| 2025 | The GeometricKernels Package: Heat and Matérn Kernels for Geometric Learning on Manifolds, Meshes, and GraphsabstractKernels are a fundamental technical primitive in machine learning. In recent years, kernel-based methods such as Gaussian processes are becoming increasingly important in applications where quantifying uncertainty is of key interest. In settings that involve structured data defined on graphs, meshes, manifolds, or other related spaces, defining kernels with good uncertainty-quantification behavior, and computing their value numerically, is less straightforward than in the Euclidean setting. To address this difficulty, we present GeometricKernels, a Python software package which implements the geometric analogs of classical Euclidean squared exponential--also known as heat--and Matérn kernels, which are widely-used in settings where uncertainty is of key interest. As a byproduct, we obtain the ability to compute Fourier-feature-type expansions, which are widely used in their own right, on a wide set of geometric spaces. Our implementation supports automatic differentiation in every major current framework simultaneously via a backend-agnostic design. In this companion paper to the package and its documentation, we outline the capabilities of the package and present an illustrated example of its interface. We also include a brief overview of the theory the package is built upon and provide some historic context in the appendix. Peter Mostowsky, Vincent Dutordoir, Iskander Azangulov, Noémie Jaquier, Michael J. Hutchinson, Aditya Ravuri, Leonel Rozo, Alexander Terenin, Viacheslav Borovitskiy |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2024 | Stationary Kernels and Gaussian Processes on Lie Groups and their Homogeneous Spaces I: the compact caseabstractGaussian processes are arguably the most important class of spatiotemporal models within machine learning. They encode prior information about the modeled function and can be used for exact or approximate Bayesian learning. In many applications, particularly in physical sciences and engineering, but also in areas such as geostatistics and neuroscience, invariance to symmetries is one of the most fundamental forms of prior information one can consider. The invariance of a Gaussian process' covariance to such symmetries gives rise to the most natural generalization of the concept of stationarity to such spaces. In this work, we develop constructive and practical techniques for building stationary Gaussian processes on a very large class of non-Euclidean spaces arising in the context of symmetries. Our techniques make it possible to (i) calculate covariance kernels and (ii) sample from prior and posterior Gaussian processes defined on such spaces, both in a practical manner. This work is split into two parts, each involving different technical considerations: part I studies compact spaces, while part II studies non-compact spaces possessing certain structure. Our contributions make the non-Euclidean Gaussian process models we study compatible with well-understood computational techniques available in standard Gaussian process software packages, thereby making them accessible to practitioners. Iskander Azangulov, Andrei Smolensky, Alexander Terenin, Viacheslav Borovitskiy |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2024 | Stationary Kernels and Gaussian Processes on Lie Groups and their Homogeneous Spaces II: non-compact symmetric spacesabstractGaussian processes are arguably the most important class of spatiotemporal models within machine learning. They encode prior information about the modeled function and can be used for exact or approximate Bayesian learning. In many applications, particularly in physical sciences and engineering, but also in areas such as geostatistics and neuroscience, invariance to symmetries is one of the most fundamental forms of prior information one can consider. The invariance of a Gaussian process' covariance to such symmetries gives rise to the most natural generalization of the concept of stationarity to such spaces. In this work, we develop constructive and practical techniques for building stationary Gaussian processes on a very large class of non-Euclidean spaces arising in the context of symmetries. Our techniques make it possible to (i) calculate covariance kernels and (ii) sample from prior and posterior Gaussian processes defined on such spaces, both in a practical manner. This work is split into two parts, each involving different technical considerations: part I studies compact spaces, while part II studies non-compact spaces possessing certain structure. Our contributions make the non-Euclidean Gaussian process models we study compatible with well-understood computational techniques available in standard Gaussian process software packages, thereby making them accessible to practitioners. Iskander Azangulov, Andrei Smolensky, Alexander Terenin, Viacheslav Borovitskiy |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2021 | Matérn Gaussian Processes on GraphsabstractGaussian processes are a versatile framework for learning unknown functions in a manner that permits one to utilize prior information about their properties. Although many different Gaussian process models are readily available when the input space is Euclidean, the choice is much more limited for Gaussian processes whose input space is an undirected graph. In this work, we leverage the stochastic partial differential equation characterization of Matérn Gaussian processes—a widely-used model class in the Euclidean setting—to study their analog for undirected graphs. We show that the resulting Gaussian processes inherit various attractive properties of their Euclidean and Riemannian analogs and provide techniques that allow them to be trained using standard methods, such as inducing points. This enables graph Matérn Gaussian processes to be employed in mini-batch and non-conjugate settings, thereby making them more accessible to practitioners and easier to deploy within larger learning frameworks. Viacheslav Borovitskiy, Iskander Azangulov, Alexander Terenin, Peter Mostowsky, Marc Peter Deisenroth, Nicolas Durrande |
AISTATS | 2 |