Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adriana Amyette

dblp:277/7758 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-2378-1375ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 44% Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 44% Energy-efficient computing · 13%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
FPGA accelerator
0.512021
Quantifying the design-space tradeoffs in autonomous drones · ASPLOS 2021
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM
0.112021
Quantifying the design-space tradeoffs in autonomous drones · ASPLOS 2021
Energy-efficient computing
energy-constrained computing
0.112021
Quantifying the design-space tradeoffs in autonomous drones · ASPLOS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

design space exploration · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Quantifying the design-space tradeoffs in autonomous drones
abstract
With fully autonomous flight capabilities coupled with user-specific applications, drones, in particular quadcopter drones, are becoming prevalent solutions in myriad commercial and research contexts. However, autonomous drones must operate within constraints and design considerations that are quite different from any other compute-based agent. At any given time, a drone must arbitrate among its limited compute, energy, and electromechanical resources. Despite huge technological advances in this area, each of these problems has been approached in isolation and drone systems design-space tradeoffs are largely unknown. To address this knowledge gap, we formalize the fundamental drone subsystems and find how computations impact this design space. We present a design-space exploration of autonomous drone systems and quantify how we can provide productive solutions. As an example, we study widely used simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) on various platforms and demonstrate that optimizing SLAM on FPGA is more fruitful for the drones. Finally, to address the lack of publicly available experimental drones, we release our open-source drone that is customizable across the hardware-software stack.
Ramyad Hadidi, Bahar Asgari, Sam Jijina, Adriana Amyette, Nima Shoghi, Hyesoon Kim
ASPLOS4
2020 Understanding the Software and Hardware Stacks of a General-Purpose Cognitive Drone
abstract
Fully autonomous drones have a plethora of applications in the real world, from agriculture and communication to public services. With increasing attention, a new market segment has opened up for highly efficient drones. However, the deployment of efficient drones requires an in-depth analysis of several components spanning from hardware sensors to software stack. Specifically, to achieve high reliability, safety, and performance, the top concerns in the professional drone industry are characterizing underlying architecture and flight stack. In this paper, we characterize a widely-used open source flight stack, ArduCopter, to understand the performance requirements as a research community. Additionally, we study how area-specific applications affect flight stack. Our characterizations and benchmarks indicate that the drone flying range can be dramatically increased by optimizing the underlying flight controller software.
Sam Jijina, Adriana Amyette, Nima Shoghi, Ramyad Hadidi, Hyesoon Kim
ISPASS2