VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chonghan Liu
dblp:277/9934
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 68% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 25% Vision and language · 7% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Does RLVR Extend Reasoning Boundaries? Investigating Capability Expansion in Vision-Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Does RLVR Extend Reasoning Boundaries? Investigating Capability Expansion in Vision-Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
process reward model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AdaptiveStep: Automatically Dividing Reasoning Step through Model Confidence · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward model training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AdaptiveStep: Automatically Dividing Reasoning Step through Model Confidence · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Does RLVR Extend Reasoning Boundaries? Investigating Capability Expansion in Vision-Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
synthetic maze generation · 1.0pass@k sampling · 1.0confidence-based reasoning step division · 0.9best-of-n · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Does RLVR Extend Reasoning Boundaries? Investigating Capability Expansion in Vision-Language ModelsabstractRecent studies posit that Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) primarily amplifies behaviors inherent to the pre-training distribution rather than inducing new capabilities, but these insights are predominantly limited to language-only domains, leaving the dynamics of visual-centric spatial reasoning under-explored. To examine the impact of RLVR on the capability boundaries of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), we introduce \textbf{Ariadne}, a controlled framework based on synthetic maze navigation where the reasoning difficulty is precisely regulated by path length and the number of turns. We demonstrate that applying RLVR extends the spatial reasoning boundary, achieving success on problems where the base policy VLM consistently attains $0\%$ accuracy despite increasing pass@k sampling budgets, indicating that the optimized policy successfully navigates search spaces that were effectively unreachable by the base distribution. Furthermore, despite being trained exclusively on synthetic mazes, we evaluate the model on two real-world navigation benchmarks (MapBench and ReasonMap) in a zero-shot setting. The observed improvements in these out-of-domain tasks suggest genuine spatial reasoning capability expansion rather than mere sampling efficiency. Minghe Shen, Zhuo Zhi, Chonghan Liu, Shuo Xing, Zhengzhong Tu |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2025 | AdaptiveStep: Automatically Dividing Reasoning Step through Model ConfidenceabstractCurrent approaches for training Process Reward Models (PRMs) often involve deconposing responses into multiple reasoning steps using rule-based techniques, such as using predefined placeholder tokens or setting the reasoning step’s length to a fixed size. These approaches overlook the fact that certain words don’t usually indicate true decision points. To address this, we propose AdaptiveStep, a method that divides reasoning steps based on the model’s confidence in predicting the next word, offering more information on decision-making at each step, improving downstream tasks like reward model training. Moreover, our method requires no manual annotation. Experiments with AdaptiveStep-trained PRMs in mathematical reasoning and code generation show that the outcome PRM achieves state-of-the-art Best-of-N performance, surpassing greedy search strategy with token-level value-guided decoding, while also reducing construction costs by over 30% compared to existing open-source PRMs. We also provide a thorough analysis and case study on its performance, transferability, and generalization capabilities. We provide our code on https://github.com/Lux0926/ASPRM. Chaofeng Qu, Zhaoling Chen, Zefan Cai, Jason Klein Liu, Chonghan Liu, Yunhui Xia, Li Zhao 0007, Jiang Bian 0002, Chuheng Zhang, Wei Shen 0005, Zhouhan Lin |
ICML | 7 |