Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mikhail Konobeev

dblp:278/0119 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 37% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 17% Reinforcement learning · 17%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
1.022021
Meta-Thompson Sampling · ICML 2021
A Distribution-dependent Analysis of Meta Learning · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
estimation error bounds
0.612022
Trace norm regularization for multi-task learning with scarce data · COLT 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › subspace learning
low-rank representation
0.612022
Trace norm regularization for multi-task learning with scarce data · COLT 2022
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
0.612022
Trace norm regularization for multi-task learning with scarce data · COLT 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization › spectral regularization
nuclear norm regularization
0.612022
Trace norm regularization for multi-task learning with scarce data · COLT 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory
0.612022
Trace norm regularization for multi-task learning with scarce data · COLT 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
distribution-dependent bounds
0.512021
A Distribution-dependent Analysis of Meta Learning · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
0.512021
Meta-Thompson Sampling · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory
meta-learning theory
0.512021
A Distribution-dependent Analysis of Meta Learning · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
thompson sampling
0.512021
Meta-Thompson Sampling · ICML 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trace norm regularization · 0.6meta-learning · 0.6thompson sampling · 0.5spectral methods · 0.5biased regularized regression · 0.5bayesian regret analysis · 0.5EM algorithm · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Trace norm regularization for multi-task learning with scarce data
abstract
Multi-task learning leverages structural similarities between multiple tasks to learn despite very few samples. Motivated by the recent success of neural networks applied to data-scarce tasks, we consider a linear low-dimensional shared representation model. Despite an extensive literature, existing theoretical results either guarantee weak estimation rates or require a large number of samples per task. This work provides the first estimation error bound for the trace norm regularized estimator when the number of samples per task is small. The advantages of trace norm regularization for learning data-scarce tasks extend to meta-learning and are confirmed empirically on synthetic datasets.
Etienne Boursier, Mikhail Konobeev, Nicolas Flammarion
COLT2
2021 A Distribution-dependent Analysis of Meta Learning
abstract
A key problem in the theory of meta-learning is to understand how the task distributions influence transfer risk, the expected error of a meta-learner on a new task drawn from the unknown task distribution. In this paper, focusing on fixed design linear regression with Gaussian noise and a Gaussian task (or parameter) distribution, we give distribution-dependent lower bounds on the transfer risk of any algorithm, while we also show that a novel, weighted version of the so-called biased regularized regression method is able to match these lower bounds up to a fixed constant factor. Notably, the weighting is derived from the covariance of the Gaussian task distribution. Altogether, our results provide a precise characterization of the difficulty of meta-learning in this Gaussian setting. While this problem setting may appear simple, we show that it is rich enough to unify the “parameter sharing” and “representation learning” streams of meta-learning; in particular, representation learning is obtained as the special case when the covariance matrix of the task distribution is unknown. For this case we propose to adopt the EM method, which is shown to enjoy efficient updates in our case. The paper is completed by an empirical study of EM. In particular, our experimental results show that the EM algorithm can attain the lower bound as the number of tasks grows, while the algorithm is also successful in competing with its alternatives when used in a representation learning context.
Mikhail Konobeev, Ilja Kuzborskij, Csaba Szepesvári
ICML1
2021 Meta-Thompson Sampling
abstract
Efficient exploration in bandits is a fundamental online learning problem. We propose a variant of Thompson sampling that learns to explore better as it interacts with bandit instances drawn from an unknown prior. The algorithm meta-learns the prior and thus we call it MetaTS. We propose several efficient implementations of MetaTS and analyze it in Gaussian bandits. Our analysis shows the benefit of meta-learning and is of a broader interest, because we derive a novel prior-dependent Bayes regret bound for Thompson sampling. Our theory is complemented by empirical evaluation, which shows that MetaTS quickly adapts to the unknown prior.
Branislav Kveton, Mikhail Konobeev, Manzil Zaheer, Martin Mladenov, Craig Boutilier, Csaba Szepesvári
ICML2