The simple temporal problem (STP) and its generalization allowing disjunctive constraints (DTP) are some of the most influential reasoning formalisms for temporal information in AI. We study the problem of resolving inconsistency of data encoded in the DTP, i.e. given a DTP instance, find the minimum number of constraints to remove to make it satisfiable. While this problem is NP-hard in general, it is reasonable to assume that the amount of erroneous data will be small in practical instances. We therefore study the parameterized complexity of this problem parameterized by the number of constraints to be removed to achieve satisfiability, and obtain full P/NP-hard and FPT/W[1]-hard dichotomies for all binary DTP languages.

Determining the validity of a quantified Boolean formula (QBF) is a PSPACE-complete problem with rich expressive power. Despite interest in efficient solvers, there is, compared to problems in NP, a lack of positive theoretical results, and in the parameterized complexity setting one often has to restrict the quantifier prefix (e.g., bounding alternations) to obtain fixed parameter tractability (FPT). We propose a new parameter: the number of variables in clauses that has to be removed before reaching a tractable class (a clause covering (CC) backdoor). We are then interested in solving QBF in FPT time given a CC-backdoor of size k. We consider the three classical, tractable cases of QBF as base classes: Horn, 2-CNF, and linear equations. We establish W[1]-hardness for Horn but prove FPT for the others, and prove that in a precise, algebraic sense, we are only missing one important case for a full dichotomy. Our algorithms are non-trivial and depend on propagation, and Gaussian elimination, respectively, and are comparably unexplored for QBF.

Abstract We revisit the computational problem of partitioning indivisibles into bundles among alternatives to maximize value (e.g., welfare). These problems have broad applications, yet many important variants are computationally hard, including well-known instances in operations research, computational economics, and artificial intelligence. To address this complexity, we analyze novel restrictions and concise representations for this problem class and establish new complexity results. Building on these findings, we present improved complexity bounds using a hypergraph-based characterization and introduce a novel “bootstrapped” dynamic programming method that significantly outperforms existing algorithms for a broad class of problems. Other findings include: polynomial-time solvability for problems with non-negative synergies and two alternatives; the problem remaining -hard even when bounding bundle sizes to two, with other instances being polynomial-time solvable; and exploration of bounds for more general cases allowing externalities and balanced (mixed) welfare, offering efficient approximation and non-trivial exponential-time algorithms for many hard cases.

We consider the Min-r-Lin(ℤ_m) problem: given a system S of length-r linear equations modulo m, find Z ⊆ S of minimum cardinality such that S-Z is satisfiable. The problem is NP-hard and UGC-hard to approximate in polynomial time within any constant factor even when r = m = 2. We focus on parameterized approximation with solution size as the parameter. Dabrowski, Jonsson, Ordyniak, Osipov and Wahlström [SODA-2023] showed that Min-r-Lin(ℤ_m) is in FPT if m is prime (i.e. ℤ_m is a field), and it is W[1]-hard if m is not a prime power. We show that Min-r-Lin(ℤ_{pⁿ}) is FPT-approximable within a factor of 2 for every prime p and integer n ≥ 2. This implies that Min-2-Lin(ℤ_m), m ∈ ℤ^+, is FPT-approximable within a factor of 2ω(m) where ω(m) counts the number of distinct prime divisors of m. The high-level idea behind the algorithm is to solve tighter and tighter relaxations of the problem, decreasing the set of possible values for the variables at each step. When working over ℤ_{pⁿ} and viewing the values in base-p, one can roughly think of a relaxation as fixing the number of trailing zeros and the least significant nonzero digits of the values assigned to the variables. To solve the relaxed problem, we construct a certain graph where solutions can be identified with a particular collection of cuts. The relaxation may hide obstructions that will only become visible in the next iteration of the algorithm, which makes it difficult to find optimal solutions. To deal with this, we use a strategy based on shadow removal [Marx & Razgon, STOC-2011] to compute solutions that (1) cost at most twice as much as the optimum and (2) allow us to reduce the set of values for all variables simultaneously. We complement the algorithmic result with two lower bounds, ruling out constant-factor FPT-approximation for Min-3-Lin(R) over any nontrivial ring R and for Min-2-Lin(R) over some finite commutative rings R.

Checking whether a system of linear equations is consistent is a basic computational problem with ubiquitous applications. When dealing with inconsistent systems, one may seek an assignment that minimises the number of unsatisfied equations. This problem is NP-hard and UGC-hard to approximate within any constant even for two-variable equations over the two-element field. We study this problem from the point of view of parameterized complexity, with the parameter being the number of unsatisfied equations. We consider equations defined over a family of commutative domains (i.e. rings without zero divisors) with a particular Helly property. This set contains, for instance, finite and infinite fields, the ring of integers and univariate polynomial rings with coefficients from a field; more generally, it contains the important class of Prüfer domains. We show that if every equation contains at most two variables, the problem is fixed-parameter tractable. This generalises many eminent graph separation problems such as Bipartization, Multiway Cut and Multicut parameterized by the size of the cutset. To complement this, we show that the problem is W[1]-hard when three or more variables are allowed in an equation, as well as for many commutative rings that are not covered by our fpt result. On the technical side, we introduce the notion of important balanced subgraphs, generalising the important separators of Marx to the setting of biased graphs. Furthermore, we use recent results of Kim, Kratsch, Pilipczuk and Wahlström on parameterized MinCSP to efficiently solve a generalisation of Multicut with disjunctive cut requests.

The input in the Minimum-Cost Constraint Satisfaction Problem (MinCSP) over the Point Algebra contains a set of variables, a collection of constraints of the form x < y, x = y, x ≤ y and x ≠ y, and a budget k. The goal is to check whether it is possible to assign rational values to the variables while breaking constraints of total cost at most k. This problem generalizes several prominent graph separation and transversal problems: - MinCSP({<}) is equivalent to Directed Feedback Arc Set, - MinCSP({< , ≤}) is equivalent to Directed Subset Feedback Arc Set, - MinCSP({= ,≠}) is equivalent to Edge Multicut, and - MinCSP({≤ ,≠}) is equivalent to Directed Symmetric Multicut. Apart from trivial cases, MinCSP({Γ}) for Γ ⊆ {< , = , ≤ ,≠} is NP-hard even to approximate within any constant factor under the Unique Games Conjecture. Hence, we study parameterized complexity of this problem under a natural parameterization by the solution cost k. We obtain a complete classification: if Γ ⊆ {< , = , ≤ ,≠} contains both ≤ and ≠, then MinCSP({Γ}) is W[1]-hard, otherwise it is fixed-parameter tractable. For the positive cases, we solve MinCSP({< , = ,≠}), generalizing the FPT results for Directed Feedback Arc Set and Edge Multicut as well as their weighted versions. Our algorithm works by reducing the problem into a Boolean MinCSP, which is in turn solved by flow augmentation. For the lower bounds, we prove that Directed Symmetric Multicut is W[1]-hard, solving an open problem.

We study the parameterized complexity of MinCSP for so-called equality languages, i.e., for finite languages over an infinite domain such as ℕ, where the relations are defined via first-order formulas whose only predicate is =. This is an important class of languages that forms the starting point of all study of infinite-domain CSPs under the commonly used approach pioneered by Bodirsky, i.e., languages defined as reducts of finitely bounded homogeneous structures. Moreover, MinCSP over equality languages forms a natural class of optimisation problems in its own right, covering such problems as Edge Multicut, Steiner Multicut and (under singleton expansion) Edge Multiway Cut. We classify MinCSP(Γ) for every finite equality language Γ, under the natural parameter, as either FPT, W[1]-hard but admitting a constant-factor FPT-approximation, or not admitting a constant-factor FPT-approximation unless FPT=W[2]. In particular, we describe an FPT case that slightly generalises Multicut, and show a constant-factor FPT-approximation for Disjunctive Multicut, the generalisation of Multicut where the "cut requests" come as disjunctions over O(1) individual cut requests s_i ≠ t_i. We also consider singleton expansions of equality languages, enriching an equality language with the capability for assignment constraints (x = i) for either a finite or infinitely many constants i, and fully characterize the complexity of the resulting MinCSP.

Constraint satisfaction problems form a nicely behaved class of problems that lends itself to complexity classification results. From the point of view of parameterized complexity, a natural task is to classify the parameterized complexity of MinCSP problems parameterized by the number of unsatisfied constraints. In other words, we ask whether we can delete at most $k$ constraints, where $k$ is the parameter, to get a satisfiable instance. In this work, we take a step towards classifying the parameterized complexity for an important infinite-domain CSP: Allen's interval algebra (IA). This CSP has closed intervals with rational endpoints as domain values and employs a set $A$ of 13 basic comparison relations such as ``precedes'' or ``during'' for relating intervals. IA is a highly influential and well-studied formalism within AI and qualitative reasoning that has numerous applications in, for instance, planning, natural language processing and molecular biology. We provide an FPT vs. W[1]-hard dichotomy for MinCSP$(Γ)$ for all $Γ\subseteq A$. IA is sometimes extended with unions of the relations in $A$ or first-order definable relations over $A$, but extending our results to these cases would require first solving the parameterized complexity of Directed Symmetric Multicut, which is a notorious open problem. Already in this limited setting, we uncover connections to new variants of graph cut and separation problems. This includes hardness proofs for simultaneous cuts or feedback arc set problems in directed graphs, as well as new tractable cases with algorithms based on the recently introduced flow augmentation technique. Given the intractability of MinCSP$(A)$ in general, we then consider (parameterized) approximation algorithms and present a factor-$2$ fpt-approximation algorithm.

Checking whether a system of linear equations is consistent is a basic computational problem with ubiquitous applications. When dealing with inconsistent systems, one may seek an assignment that minimizes the number of unsatisfied equations. This problem is NP-hard and UGC-hard to approximate within any constant even for two-variable equations over the two-element field. We study this problem from the point of view of parameterized complexity, with the parameter being the number of unsatisfied equations. We consider equations defined over Euclidean domains—a family of commutative rings that generalize finite and infinite fields including the rationals, the ring of integers and many other structures. We show that if every equation contains at most two variables, the problem is fixed-parameter tractable. This generalizes many eminent graph separation problems such as Bipartization, Multiway Cut and Multicut parameterized by the size of the cutset. To complement this, we show that the problem is W[1]-hard when three or more variables are allowed in an equation, as well as for many commutative rings that are not Euclidean domains. On the technical side, we introduce the notion of important balanced subgraphs, generalizing important separators of Marx [Theor. Comput. Sci. 2006] to the setting of biased graphs. Furthermore, we use recent results on parameterized MinCSP [Kim et al., SODA 2021] to efficiently solve a generalization of Multicut with disjunctive cut requests. * The full version of the paper can be accessed at https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.02732

The constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) has important applications in computer science and AI. In particular, infinite-domain CSPs have been intensively used in subareas of AI such as spatio-temporal reasoning. Since constraint satisfaction is a computationally hard problem, much work has been devoted to identifying restricted problems that are efficiently solvable. One way of doing this is to restrict the interactions of variables and constraints, and a highly successful approach is to bound the treewidth of the underlying primal graph. Bodirsky & Dalmau (2013) [14] and Huang et al. (2013) [47] proved that CSP(Γ) can be solved in nf(w) time (where n is the size of the instance, w is the treewidth of the primal graph and f is a computable function) for certain classes of constraint languages Γ. We improve this bound to f(w)⋅nO(1), where the function f only depends on the language Γ, for CSPs whose basic relations have the patchwork property. Hence, such problems are fixed-parameter tractable and our algorithm is asymptotically faster than the previous ones. Additionally, our approach is not restricted to binary constraints, so it is applicable to a strictly larger class of problems than that of Huang et al. However, there exist natural problems that are covered by Bodirsky & Dalmau's algorithm but not by ours, and we begin investigating ways of generalising our results to larger families of languages. We also analyse our algorithm with respect to its running time and show that it is optimal (under the Exponential Time Hypothesis) for certain languages such as Allen's Interval Algebra.

The constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) has important applications in computer science and AI. In particular, infinite-domain CSPs have been intensively used in subareas of AI such as spatio-temporal reasoning. Since constraint satisfaction is a computationally hard problem, much work has been devoted to identifying restricted problems that are efficiently solvable. One way of doing this is to restrict the interactions of variables and constraints, and a highly successful approach is to bound the treewidth of the underlying primal graph. Bodirsky & Dalmau [J. Comput. System. Sci., 79(1), 2013] and Huang et al. [Artif. Intell., 195, 2013] proved that CSP(Γ) can be solved in n^(f(w)) time (where n is the size of the instance, w is the treewidth of the primal graph and f is a computable function) for certain classes of constraint languages Γ. We improve this bound to f(w)n^(O(1)), where the function f only depends on the language Γ, for CSPs whose basic relations have the patchwork property. Hence, such problems are fixed-parameter tractable and our algorithm is asymptotically faster than the previous ones. Additionally, our approach is not restricted to binary constraints, so it is applicable to a strictly larger class of problems than that of Huang et al. However, there exist natural problems that are covered by Bodirsky & Dalmau's algorithm but not by ours.

The disjunctive temporal problem (DTP) is an expressive temporal formalism that extends Dechter et al.'s simple temporal problem. The DTP is well studied in the literature and has many important applications. It is known that deciding satisfiability of DTPs is NP-hard and that, in many cases, single-exponential algorithms (running in O(c^n) time) do not exist under the Exponential-Time Hypothesis. The computational hardness makes it worthwhile to identify restricted problems that are efficiently solvable. One way of doing this is to restrict the interactions of variables and constraints. We show that instances of DTP of any arity with integers bounded by poly(n) can be solved in n^{f(w)} time, where n denotes the problem size, w is the treewidth of the incidence graph and f is a computable function; in other words, this problem is in the complexity class XP and it can be solved in polynomial time whenever w is fixed. We complement this result by showing that binary DTPs that only involve the integers 0 and 1 are not fixed-parameter tractable with respect to treewidth, i.e. they do not admit a f(w)poly(n)$ time algorithm for any computable function f, under standard complexity assumptions. For instances with unbounded integers, we show that even binary DTPs parameterized by treewidth cannot be in XP, unless P = NP.

Many computational problems arising in, for instance, artificial intelligence can be realized as infinite-domain constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) based on partition schemes: a set of pairwise disjoint binary relations (containing the equality relation) whose union spans the underlying domain and which is closed under converse. We first consider partition schemes that contain an acyclic order and where the constraint language contains all unions of the basic relations; such CSPs are frequently occurring in e.g. temporal and spatial reasoning. We identify properties of such orders which, when combined, are sufficient to establish NP-hardness of the CSP and strong lower bounds under the exponential-time hypothesis, even for degree-bounded problems. This result explains, in a uniform way, many existing hardness results from the literature, and shows that it is impossible to obtain subexponential time algorithms unless the exponential-time hypothesis fails. However, some of these problems (including several important temporal problems), despite likely not being solvable in subexponential time, admit non-trivial improved exponential-time algorithm, and we present a novel improved algorithm for RCC-8 and related formalisms.

Expressive temporal reasoning formalisms are essential for AI. One family of such formalisms consists of disjunctive extensions of the simple temporal problem (STP). Such extensions are well studied in the literature and they have many important applications. It is known that deciding satisfiability of disjunctive STPs is NP-hard, while the fine-grained complexity of such problems is virtually unexplored. We present novel algorithms that exploit structural properties of the solution space and prove, assuming the Exponential-Time Hypothesis, that their worst-case time complexity is close to optimal. Among other things, we make progress towards resolving a long-open question concerning whether Allen's interval algebra can be solved in single-exponential time, by giving a 2^{O(nloglog(n))} algorithm for the special case of unit-length intervals.