Quantum error correction is essential for achieving practical quantum computing but has a significant computational overhead. Among fault-tolerant (FT) gate operations, non-Clifford gates, such as T, are particularly expensive due to their reliance on magic state distillation. These costly T gates appear frequently in FT circuits as many quantum algorithms require arbitrary single-qubit rotations, such as Rx and Rz gates, which must be decomposed into a sequence of T and Clifford gates. In many quantum circuits, Rx and Rz gates can be fused to form a single U3 unitary. However, existing synthesis methods, such as gridsynth, rely on indirect decompositions, requiring separate Rz decompositions that result in a threefold increase in T count.

To evaluate a quantum circuit on a quantum processor, one must find a mapping from circuit qubits to processor qubits and plan the instruction execution while satisfying the processor’s constraints. This is known as the qubit mapping and routing ( qmr ) problem. High-quality qmr solutions are key to maximizing the utility of scarce quantum resources and minimizing the probability of logical errors affecting computation. The challenge is that the landscape of quantum processors is incredibly diverse and fast-evolving. Given this diversity, dozens of papers have addressed the qmr problem for different qubit hardware, connectivity constraints, and quantum error correction schemes by a developing a new algorithm for a particular context. We present an alternative approach: automatically generating qubit mapping and routing compilers for arbitrary quantum processors. Though each qmr problem is different, we identify a common core structure— device state machine —that we use to formulate an abstract qmr problem . Our formulation naturally leads to a compact domain-specific language for specifying qmr problems and a powerful parametric algorithm that can be instantiated for any qmr specification. Our thorough evaluation on case studies of important qmr problems shows that generated compilers are competitive with handwritten, specialized compilers in terms of runtime and solution quality.

Optimizing quantum circuits is critical: the number of quantum operations needs to be minimized for a successful evaluation of a circuit on a quantum processor. In this paper we unify two disparate ideas for optimizing quantum circuits, rewrite rules, which are fast standard optimizer passes, and unitary synthesis, which is slow, requiring a search through the space of circuits. We present a clean, unifying framework for thinking of rewriting and resynthesis as abstract circuit transformations. We then present a radically simple algorithm, guoq, for optimizing quantum circuits that exploits the synergies of rewriting and resynthesis. Our extensive evaluation demonstrates the ability of guoq to strongly outperform existing optimizers on a wide range of benchmarks.

Practical applications of quantum computing depend on fault-tolerant devices with error correction. Today, the most promising approach is a class of error-correcting codes called surface codes. We study the problem of compiling quantum circuits for quantum computers implementing surface codes. Optimal or near-optimal compilation is critical for both efficiency and correctness. The compilation problem requires (1) mapping circuit qubits to the device qubits and (2) routing execution paths between interacting qubits. We solve this problem efficiently and near-optimally with a novel algorithm that exploits the dependency structure of circuit operations to formulate discrete optimization problems that can be approximated via simulated annealing, a classic and simple algorithm. Our extensive evaluation shows that our approach is powerful and flexible for compiling realistic workloads.

Clients rely on database systems to be correct, which requires the system not only to implement transactions’ semantics correctly but also to provide isolation guarantees for the transactions. This paper presents a clientcentric technique for checking both semantic correctness and isolation-level guarantees for black-box database systems based on observations collected from running transactions on these systems. Our technique verifies observational correctness with respect to a given set of transactions and observations for them, which holds iff there exists a possible correct execution of the transactions under a given isolation level that could result in these observations. Our technique relies on novel symbolic encodings of (1) the semantic correctness of database transactions in the presence of weak isolation and (2) isolation-level guarantees. These are used by the checker to query a Satisfiability Modulo Theories solver. We applied our tool Troubadour to verify observational correctness of several database systems, including PostgreSQL and an industrial system under development, in which the tool helped detect two new bugs. We also demonstrate that Troubadour is able to find known semantic correctness bugs and detect isolation-related anomalies.

Near-term quantum computers are expected to work in an environment where each operation is noisy, with no error correction. Therefore, quantum-circuit optimizers are applied to minimize the number of noisy operations. Today, physicists are constantly experimenting with novel devices and architectures. For every new physical substrate and for every modification of a quantum computer, we need to modify or rewrite major pieces of the optimizer to run successful experiments. In this paper, we present QUESO, an efficient approach for automatically synthesizing a quantum-circuit optimizer for a given quantum device. For instance, in 1.2 minutes, QUESO can synthesize an optimizer with high-probability correctness guarantees for IBM computers that significantly outperforms leading compilers, such as IBM's Qiskit and TKET, on the majority (85%) of the circuits in a diverse benchmark suite. A number of theoretical and algorithmic insights underlie QUESO: (1) An algebraic approach for representing rewrite rules and their semantics. This facilitates reasoning about complex symbolic rewrite rules that are beyond the scope of existing techniques. (2) A fast approach for probabilistically verifying equivalence of quantum circuits by reducing the problem to a special form of polynomial identity testing . (3) A novel probabilistic data structure, called a polynomial identity filter (PIF), for efficiently synthesizing rewrite rules. (4) A beam-search-based algorithm that efficiently applies the synthesized symbolic rewrite rules to optimize quantum circuits.

Near-term quantum computers will operate in a noisy environment, without error correction. A critical problem for near-term quantum computing is laying out a logical circuit onto a physical device with limited connectivity between qubits. This is known as the qubit mapping and routing (QMR) problem, an intractable combinatorial problem. It is important to solve QMR as optimally as possible to reduce the amount of added noise, which may render a quantum computation useless. In this paper, we present a novel approach for optimally solving the QMR problem via a reduction to maximum satisfiability (MAXSAT). Additionally, we present two novel relaxation ideas that shrink the size of the MAXSAT constraints by exploiting the structure of a quantum circuit. Our thorough empirical evaluation demonstrates (1) the scalability of our approach compared to state-of-the-art optimal QMR techniques (solves more than 3x benchmarks with 40x speedup), (2) the significant cost reduction compared to state-of-the-art heuristic approaches (an average of ~5x swap reduction), and (3) the power of our proposed constraint relaxations.

P4 is a domain-specific language for programming and specifying packet-processing systems. It is based on an elegant design with high-level abstractions like parsers and match-action pipelines that can be compiled to efficient implementations in software or hardware. Unfortunately, like many industrial languages, P4 has developed without a formal foundation. The P4 Language Specification is a 160-page document with a mixture of informal prose, graphical diagrams, and pseudocode, leaving many aspects of the language semantics up to individual compilation targets. The P4 reference implementation is a complex system, running to over 40KLoC of C++ code, with support for only a few targets. Clearly neither of these artifacts is suitable for formal reasoning about P4 in general. This paper presents a new framework, called Petr4, that puts P4 on a solid foundation. Petr4 consists of a clean-slate definitional interpreter and a core calculus that models a fragment of P4. Petr4 is not tied to any particular target: the interpreter is parameterized over an interface that collects features delegated to targets in one place, while the core calculus overapproximates target-specific behaviors using non-determinism. We have validated the interpreter against a suite of over 750 tests from the P4 reference implementation, exercising our target interface with tests for different targets. We validated the core calculus with a proof of type-preserving termination. While developing Petr4, we reported dozens of bugs in the language specification and the reference implementation, many of which have been fixed.