VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Leslie O'Bray
dblp:278/3231
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-8999-9962ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Graph learning · 77% Trustworthy machine learning · 11% Deep learning architectures and training · 11% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | <tt>networkGWAS</tt> : a network-based approach to discover genetic associations · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › population genetics
population stratification correction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | <tt>networkGWAS</tt> : a network-based approach to discover genetic associations · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | <tt>networkGWAS</tt> : a network-based approach to discover genetic associations · Bioinform. 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph generation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Evaluation Metrics for Graph Generative Models: Problems, Pitfalls, and Practical Solutions · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Structure-Aware Transformer for Graph Representation Learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Structure-Aware Transformer for Graph Representation Learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph transformer |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Structure-Aware Transformer for Graph Representation Learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Structure-Aware Transformer for Graph Representation Learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
structure-aware attention |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Structure-Aware Transformer for Graph Representation Learning · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Filtration Curves for Graph Representation · KDD 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
topological data analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Filtration Curves for Graph Representation · KDD 2021 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › graph learning
graph classification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Filtration Curves for Graph Representation · KDD 2021 |
Computational geometry
topological data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Filtration Curves for Graph Representation · KDD 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
persistent homology · 1.5filtration curves · 1.5network permutation · 0.7neighborhood aggregation · 0.7mixed model · 0.7subgraph representation · 0.6self-attention · 0.6positional encoding · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | <tt>networkGWAS</tt> : a network-based approach to discover genetic associationsabstractMOTIVATION: While the search for associations between genetic markers and complex traits has led to the discovery of tens of thousands of trait-related genetic variants, the vast majority of these only explain a small fraction of the observed phenotypic variation. One possible strategy to overcome this while leveraging biological prior is to aggregate the effects of several genetic markers and to test entire genes, pathways or (sub)networks of genes for association to a phenotype. The latter, network-based genome-wide association studies, in particular suffer from a vast search space and an inherent multiple testing problem. As a consequence, current approaches are either based on greedy feature selection, thereby risking that they miss relevant associations, or neglect doing a multiple testing correction, which can lead to an abundance of false positive findings. RESULTS: To address the shortcomings of current approaches of network-based genome-wide association studies, we propose networkGWAS, a computationally efficient and statistically sound approach to network-based genome-wide association studies using mixed models and neighborhood aggregation. It allows for population structure correction and for well-calibrated P-values, which are obtained through circular and degree-preserving network permutations. networkGWAS successfully detects known associations on diverse synthetic phenotypes, as well as known and novel genes in phenotypes from Saccharomycescerevisiae and Homo sapiens. It thereby enables the systematic combination of gene-based genome-wide association studies with biological network information. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/BorgwardtLab/networkGWAS.git. Giulia Muzio, Leslie O'Bray, Laetitia Meng-Papaxanthos, Juliane Klatt, Krista Fischer, Karsten M. Borgwardt |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2022 | Evaluation Metrics for Graph Generative Models: Problems, Pitfalls, and Practical Solutions
Leslie O'Bray, Max Horn, Bastian Rieck, Karsten M. Borgwardt |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Structure-Aware Transformer for Graph Representation LearningabstractThe Transformer architecture has gained growing attention in graph representation learning recently, as it naturally overcomes several limitations of graph neural networks (GNNs) by avoiding their strict structural inductive biases and instead only encoding the graph structure via positional encoding. Here, we show that the node representations generated by the Transformer with positional encoding do not necessarily capture structural similarity between them. To address this issue, we propose the Structure-Aware Transformer, a class of simple and flexible graph Transformers built upon a new self-attention mechanism. This new self-attention incorporates structural information into the original self-attention by extracting a subgraph representation rooted at each node before computing the attention. We propose several methods for automatically generating the subgraph representation and show theoretically that the resulting representations are at least as expressive as the subgraph representations. Empirically, our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on five graph prediction benchmarks. Our structure-aware framework can leverage any existing GNN to extract the subgraph representation, and we show that it systematically improves performance relative to the base GNN model, successfully combining the advantages of GNNs and Transformers. Our code is available at https://github.com/BorgwardtLab/SAT. Dexiong Chen, Leslie O'Bray, Karsten M. Borgwardt |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Filtration Curves for Graph RepresentationabstractThe two predominant approaches to graph comparison in recent years are based on (i) enumerating matching subgraphs or (ii) comparing neighborhoods of nodes. In this work, we complement these two perspectives with a third way of representing graphs: using filtration curves from topological data analysis that capture both edge weight information and global graph structure. Filtration curves are highly efficient to compute and lead to expressive representations of graphs, which we demonstrate on graph classification benchmark datasets. Our work opens the door to a new form of graph representation in data mining. Leslie O'Bray, Bastian Rieck, Karsten M. Borgwardt |
KDD | 1 |
| 2021 | Biological network analysis with deep learningabstractRecent advancements in experimental high-throughput technologies have expanded the availability and quantity of molecular data in biology. Given the importance of interactions in biological processes, such as the interactions between proteins or the bonds within a chemical compound, this data is often represented in the form of a biological network. The rise of this data has created a need for new computational tools to analyze networks. One major trend in the field is to use deep learning for this goal and, more specifically, to use methods that work with networks, the so-called graph neural networks (GNNs). In this article, we describe biological networks and review the principles and underlying algorithms of GNNs. We then discuss domains in bioinformatics in which graph neural networks are frequently being applied at the moment, such as protein function prediction, protein-protein interaction prediction and in silico drug discovery and development. Finally, we highlight application areas such as gene regulatory networks and disease diagnosis where deep learning is emerging as a new tool to answer classic questions like gene interaction prediction and automatic disease prediction from data. Giulia Muzio, Leslie O'Bray, Karsten M. Borgwardt |
Briefings Bioinform. | 2 |