Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jason Yim

dblp:278/7337 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Generative modeling · 90% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 10%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
5 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 21 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
2.232025
Generator Matching: Generative modeling with arbitrary Markov processes · ICLR 2025
SE(3) diffusion model with application to protein backbone generation · ICML 2023
Diffusion Probabilistic Modeling of Protein Backbones in 3D for the motif-scaffolding problem · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › protein design
protein structure generation
1.722025
ProtComposer: Compositional Protein Structure Generation with 3D Ellipsoids · ICLR 2025
Proteina: Scaling Flow-based Protein Structure Generative Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow
1.622025
Proteina: Scaling Flow-based Protein Structure Generative Models · ICLR 2025
Generative Flows on Discrete State-Spaces: Enabling Multimodal Flows with Applications to Protein Co-Design · ICML 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein engineering
1.422024
Improving protein optimization with smoothed fitness landscapes · ICLR 2024
SE(3) diffusion model with application to protein backbone generation · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
3d generative model
0.912025
ProtComposer: Compositional Protein Structure Generation with 3D Ellipsoids · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
discrete diffusion model
0.912025
Generator Matching: Generative modeling with arbitrary Markov processes · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
0.912025
Generator Matching: Generative modeling with arbitrary Markov processes · ICLR 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design
0.912025
Proteina: Scaling Flow-based Protein Structure Generative Models · ICLR 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
protein structure generation
0.912025
ProtComposer: Compositional Protein Structure Generation with 3D Ellipsoids · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
discrete flow model
0.812024
Generative Flows on Discrete State-Spaces: Enabling Multimodal Flows with Applications to Protein Co-Design · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › multimodal generation
multimodal generative model
0.812024
Generative Flows on Discrete State-Spaces: Enabling Multimodal Flows with Applications to Protein Co-Design · ICML 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
protein fitness optimization
0.812024
Improving protein optimization with smoothed fitness landscapes · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
protein backbone generation
0.712023
Diffusion Probabilistic Modeling of Protein Backbones in 3D for the motif-scaffolding problem · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › geometric diffusion model
SE(3) diffusion model
0.712023
SE(3) diffusion model with application to protein backbone generation · ICML 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
motif scaffolding
0.712023
Diffusion Probabilistic Modeling of Protein Backbones in 3D for the motif-scaffolding problem · ICLR 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
protein backbone generation
0.712023
SE(3) diffusion model with application to protein backbone generation · ICML 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
protein structure design
0.712023
Diffusion Probabilistic Modeling of Protein Backbones in 3D for the motif-scaffolding problem · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.412020
Sparse Projection Oblique Randomer Forests · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › decision tree
oblique decision tree
0.412020
Sparse Projection Oblique Randomer Forests · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
tree ensembles
0.412020
Sparse Projection Oblique Randomer Forests · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Geometric modeling and processing
shape representation
0.312025
ProtComposer: Compositional Protein Structure Generation with 3D Ellipsoids · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

diffusion model · 3.9statistical modeling · 2.6transformer · 1.7flow matching · 1.7classifier-free guidance · 1.7LoRA · 1.7markov process generators · 0.9jump processes · 0.9generator matching · 0.9graph signal processing · 0.8gibbs sampling · 0.8energy-based model · 0.8continuous-time markov chain · 0.8MCMC · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Proteina: Scaling Flow-based Protein Structure Generative Models
abstract
Recently, diffusion- and flow-based generative models of protein structures have emerged as a powerful tool for de novo protein design. Here, we develop *Proteina*, a new large-scale flow-based protein backbone generator that utilizes hierarchical fold class labels for conditioning and relies on a tailored scalable transformer architecture with up to $5\times$ as many parameters as previous models. To meaningfully quantify performance, we introduce a new set of metrics that directly measure the distributional similarity of generated proteins with reference sets, complementing existing metrics. We further explore scaling training data to millions of synthetic protein structures and explore improved training and sampling recipes adapted to protein backbone generation. This includes fine-tuning strategies like LoRA for protein backbones, new guidance methods like classifier-free guidance and autoguidance for protein backbones, and new adjusted training objectives. Proteina achieves state-of-the-art performance on de novo protein backbone design and produces diverse and designable proteins at unprecedented length, up to 800 residues. The hierarchical conditioning offers novel control, enabling high-level secondary-structure guidance as well as low-level fold-specific generation.
Tomas Geffner, Kieran Didi, Zuobai Zhang, Danny Reidenbach, Zhonglin Cao, Jason Yim, Mario Geiger, Christian Dallago, Emine Küçükbenli, Arash Vahdat, Karsten Kreis
ICLR6
2025 Generator Matching: Generative modeling with arbitrary Markov processes
abstract
We introduce Generator Matching, a modality-agnostic framework for generative modeling using arbitrary Markov processes. Generators characterize the infinitesimal evolution of a Markov process, which we leverage for generative modeling in a similar vein to flow matching: we construct conditional generators which generate single data points, then learn to approximate the marginal generator which generates the full data distribution. We show that Generator Matching unifies various generative modeling methods, including diffusion models, flow matching and discrete diffusion models. Furthermore, it expands the design space to new and unexplored Markov processes such as jump processes. Finally, Generator Matching enables the construction of superpositions of Markov generative models and enables the construction of multimodal models in a rigorous manner. We empirically validate our method on image and multimodal generation, e.g. showing that superposition with a jump process improves performance.
Peter Holderrieth, Marton Havasi, Jason Yim, Neta Shaul, Itai Gat, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Brian Karrer, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Yaron Lipman
ICLR3
2025 ProtComposer: Compositional Protein Structure Generation with 3D Ellipsoids
abstract
We develop ProtComposer to generate protein structures conditioned on spatial protein layouts that are specified via a set of 3D ellipsoids capturing substructure shapes and semantics. At inference time, we condition on ellipsoids that are hand-constructed, extracted from existing proteins, or from a statistical model, with each option unlocking new capabilities. Hand-specifying ellipsoids enables users to control the location, size, orientation, secondary structure, and approximate shape of protein substructures. Conditioning on ellipsoids of existing proteins enables redesigning their substructure's connectivity or editing substructure properties. By conditioning on novel and diverse ellipsoid layouts from a simple statistical model, we improve protein generation with expanded Pareto frontiers between designability, novelty, and diversity. Further, this enables sampling designable proteins with a helix-fraction that matches PDB proteins, unlike existing generative models that commonly oversample conceptually simple helix bundles. Code is available at https://github.com/NVlabs/protcomposer.
Hannes Stärk, Bowen Jing 0002, Tomas Geffner, Jason Yim, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Arash Vahdat, Karsten Kreis
ICLR4
2024 Improving protein optimization with smoothed fitness landscapes
abstract
The ability to engineer novel proteins with higher fitness for a desired property would be revolutionary for biotechnology and medicine. Modeling the combinatorially large space of sequences is infeasible; prior methods often constrain optimization to a small mutational radius, but this drastically limits the design space. Instead of heuristics, we propose smoothing the fitness landscape to facilitate protein optimization. First, we formulate protein fitness as a graph signal then use Tikunov regularization to smooth the fitness landscape. We find optimizing in this smoothed landscape leads to improved performance across multiple methods in the GFP and AAV benchmarks. Second, we achieve state-of-the-art results utilizing discrete energy-based models and MCMC in the smoothed landscape. Our method, called Gibbs sampling with Graph-based Smoothing (GGS), demonstrates a unique ability to achieve 2.5 fold fitness improvement (with in-silico evaluation) over its training set. GGS demonstrates potential to optimize proteins in the limited data regime. Code: https://github.com/kirjner/GGS
Andrew Kirjner, Jason Yim, Raman Samusevich, Shahar Bracha, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Regina Barzilay, Ila Fiete
ICLR2
2024 Generative Flows on Discrete State-Spaces: Enabling Multimodal Flows with Applications to Protein Co-Design
abstract
Combining discrete and continuous data is an important capability for generative models. We present Discrete Flow Models (DFMs), a new flow-based model of discrete data that provides the missing link in enabling flow-based generative models to be applied to multimodal continuous and discrete data problems. Our key insight is that the discrete equivalent of continuous space flow matching can be realized using Continuous Time Markov Chains. DFMs benefit from a simple derivation that includes discrete diffusion models as a specific instance while allowing improved performance over existing diffusion-based approaches. We utilize our DFMs method to build a multimodal flow-based modeling framework. We apply this capability to the task of protein co-design, wherein we learn a model for jointly generating protein structure and sequence. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art co-design performance while allowing the same multimodal model to be used for flexible generation of the sequence or structure.
Jason Yim, Regina Barzilay, Tom Rainforth, Tommi S. Jaakkola
ICML2
2023 Diffusion Probabilistic Modeling of Protein Backbones in 3D for the motif-scaffolding problem
Brian L. Trippe, Jason Yim, Doug Tischer, David Baker 0001, Tamara Broderick, Regina Barzilay, Tommi S. Jaakkola
ICLR2
2023 SE(3) diffusion model with application to protein backbone generation
abstract
The design of novel protein structures remains a challenge in protein engineering for applications across biomedicine and chemistry. In this line of work, a diffusion model over rigid bodies in 3D (referred to as frames) has shown success in generating novel, functional protein backbones that have not been observed in nature. However, there exists no principled methodological framework for diffusion on SE(3), the space of orientation preserving rigid motions in R3, that operates on frames and confers the group invariance. We address these shortcomings by developing theoretical foundations of SE(3) invariant diffusion models on multiple frames followed by a novel framework, FrameDiff, for estimating the SE(3) equivariant score over multiple frames. We apply FrameDiff on monomer backbone generation and find it can generate designable monomers up to 500 amino acids without relying on a pretrained protein structure prediction network that has been integral to previous methods. We find our samples are capable of generalizing beyond any known protein structure.
Jason Yim, Brian L. Trippe, Valentin De Bortoli, Emile Mathieu, Arnaud Doucet, Regina Barzilay, Tommi S. Jaakkola
ICML1
2020 Sparse Projection Oblique Randomer Forests
abstract
Decision forests, including Random Forests and Gradient Boosting Trees, have recently demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in a variety of machine learning settings. Decision forests are typically ensembles of axis-aligned decision trees; that is, trees that split only along feature dimensions. In contrast, many recent extensions to decision forests are based on axis-oblique splits. Unfortunately, these extensions forfeit one or more of the favorable properties of decision forests based on axis-aligned splits, such as robustness to many noise dimensions, interpretability, or computational efficiency. We introduce yet another decision forest, called “Sparse Projection Oblique Randomer Forests” (SPORF). SPORF trees recursively split along very sparse random projections. Our method significantly improves accuracy over existing state-of-the-art algorithms on a standard benchmark suite for classification with $>100$ problems of varying dimension, sample size, and number of classes. To illustrate how SPORF addresses the limitations of both axis-aligned and existing oblique decision forest methods, we conduct extensive simulated experiments. SPORF typically yields improved performance over existing decision forest methods, while mitigating computational efficiency and scalability and maintaining interpretability. Very sparse random projections can be incorporated into gradient boosted trees to obtain potentially similar gains.
Tyler M. Tomita, James Browne, Cencheng Shen, Jaewon Chung, Jesse Patsolic, Benjamin Falk, Carey E. Priebe, Jason Yim, Randal C. Burns, Mauro Maggioni, Joshua T. Vogelstein
J. Mach. Learn. Res.8