Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shiva Upadhye
dblp:278/8495
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
discourse modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Predicting Reference: What do Language Models Learn about Discourse Models? · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
psycholinguistic analysis · 0.4probing · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Examining Future Context Predictability Effects in Word-form Variation and Word Choice
Shiva Upadhye, Richard Futrell |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2023 | Typing time PWI: A scalable paradigm for studying lexical production
Shiva Upadhye, Richard Futrell |
CogSci | 1 |
| 2020 | Predicting Reference: What do Language Models Learn about Discourse Models?abstractWhereas there is a growing literature that probes neural language models to assess the degree to which they have latently acquired grammatical knowledge, little if any research has investigated their acquisition of discourse modeling ability.We address this question by drawing on a rich psycholinguistic literature that has established how different contexts affect referential biases concerning who is likely to be referred to next.The results reveal that, for the most part, the prediction behavior of neural language models does not resemble that of human language users. Shiva Upadhye, Leon Bergen, Andrew Kehler |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |