Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brandon Duderstadt

dblp:278/8843 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 46% Information extraction and text analysis · 26% Graph learning · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Debugging and program repair · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics
semantic change detection
1.012026
A Model of the Language Process · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
temporal language model
1.012026
A Model of the Language Process · ACL (1) 2026
Information retrieval › document retrieval › domain-specific retrieval
code search
0.912025
CoRNStack: High-Quality Contrastive Data for Better Code Retrieval and Reranking · ICLR 2025
Information retrieval
ranking
0.912025
CoRNStack: High-Quality Contrastive Data for Better Code Retrieval and Reranking · ICLR 2025
Information retrieval
reranking
0.912025
CoRNStack: High-Quality Contrastive Data for Better Code Retrieval and Reranking · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph diffusion
information diffusion
0.812024
Tracking the perspectives of interacting language models · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents
0.812024
Tracking the perspectives of interacting language models · EMNLP 2024
Debugging and program repair › fault localization
bug localization
0.312025
CoRNStack: High-Quality Contrastive Data for Better Code Retrieval and Reranking · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hard negative mining · 1.7contrastive learning · 1.7mechanistic analysis · 1.0bayesian framework · 1.0BERT-style transformer · 1.0simulation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 A Model of the Language Process
abstract
Language is a process that changes over time as new vocabulary emerges, word meanings shift, and narratives progress.Despite this fact, most Large Language Models are trained on corpora that lack explicit temporal information, which inhibits their ability to model the language process.In this work, we introduce the Temporal Language Model 1 (TLM-1), a BERT style transformer encoder that models that language process by jointly learning to predict document contents and classify document publication dates.We also introduce a Bayesian framework for querying TLM-1 that disentangles its temporal dynamics from several sources of anachronism.Using this query framework, we demonstrate that TLM-1 effectively surfaces several sociolinguistic trends in contemporary American English and accurately detects semantic changes in word meanings.Furthermore, we perform a mechanistic analysis of TLM-1's time token embeddings, and find that they learn a curve whose geometry recovers the ordinal progression of time.We take the existence of this curve as evidence that TLM-1 is effectively learning to reconstruct temporal language dynamics.
Brandon Duderstadt, Hayden S. Helm
ACL (1)1
2025 CoRNStack: High-Quality Contrastive Data for Better Code Retrieval and Reranking
abstract
Effective code retrieval plays a crucial role in advancing code generation, bug fixing, and software maintenance, particularly as software systems increase in complexity. While current code embedding models have demonstrated promise in retrieving code snippets for small-scale, well-defined tasks, they often underperform in more demanding real-world applications such as bug localization within GitHub repositories. We hypothesize that a key issue is their reliance on noisy and inconsistent datasets for training, which impedes their ability to generalize to more complex retrieval scenarios. To address these limitations, we introduce CoRNStack, a large-scale, high-quality contrastive training dataset for code that spans multiple programming languages. This dataset is curated using consistency filtering to eliminate noisy positives and is further enriched with mined hard negatives, thereby facilitating more effective learning. We demonstrate that contrastive training of embedding models using CoRNStack leads to state-of-the-art performance across a variety of code retrieval tasks. Furthermore, the dataset can be leveraged for training code reranking models, a largely underexplored area compared to text reranking. Our finetuned code reranking model significantly improves the ranking quality over the retrieved results. Finally, by employing our code retriever and reranker together, we demonstrate significant improvements in function localization for GitHub issues, an important component of real-world software development.
Tarun Suresh, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Zach Nussbaum, Andriy Mulyar, Brandon Duderstadt, Heng Ji 0001
ICLR6
2024 Tracking the perspectives of interacting language models
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are capable of producing high quality information at unprecedented rates.As these models continue to entrench themselves in society, the content they produce will become increasingly pervasive in databases that are, in turn, incorporated into the pre-training data, fine-tuning data, retrieval data, etc. of other language models.In this paper we formalize the idea of a communication network of LLMs and introduce a method for representing the perspective of individual models within a collection of LLMs.Given these tools we systematically study information diffusion in the communication network of LLMs in various simulated settings.
Hayden S. Helm, Brandon Duderstadt, Youngser Park, Carey E. Priebe
EMNLP2