Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hongyi Pu

dblp:279/2823 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0759-5815ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Cyber-physical and IoT security · 33% Biometric security · 33% Hardware security and side channels · 19%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 64% Image recognition and object detection · 36%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cyber-physical and IoT security
industrial control system security
1.022022
Fingerprinting Movements of Industrial Robots for Replay Attack Detection · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2022
Detecting replay attacks against industrial robots via power fingerprinting · SenSys 2020
Biometric security › anti-spoofing
replay attack detection
1.022022
Fingerprinting Movements of Industrial Robots for Replay Attack Detection · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2022
Detecting replay attacks against industrial robots via power fingerprinting · SenSys 2020
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack
power analysis
0.612022
Fingerprinting Movements of Industrial Robots for Replay Attack Detection · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2022
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection
0.412020
Detecting replay attacks against industrial robots via power fingerprinting · SenSys 2020
Robotics › Robot manipulation
industrial robot
0.322022
Fingerprinting Movements of Industrial Robots for Replay Attack Detection · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2022
Detecting replay attacks against industrial robots via power fingerprinting · SenSys 2020
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
intrusion detection
0.212022
Fingerprinting Movements of Industrial Robots for Replay Attack Detection · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data-driven modeling · 2.0power fingerprinting · 1.1physical analysis · 1.1power side-channel analysis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Deception-Resistant Stochastic Manufacturing for Automated Production Lines
abstract
The advancement of Industrial Internet-of-Things (IIoT) magnifies the cyber risk of automated production lines, especially to deception attacks that tamper with the monitoring data to prevent the manipulated operation of production lines from being detected. To address this issue, we propose Stochastic Manufacturing (StoM), a new paradigm of manufacturing that is resistant to deception by design. StoM voids the foundation of deception attacks — i.e., the highly predictable operation data due to the cyclical manufacturing process — by injecting controlled stochasticity into the operation of production lines without degrading manufacturing efficiency or quality. StoM then examines if this stochasticity can be observed from the operation data and triggers an alarm of deception attack if not. We have experimentally evaluated StoM on two production line platforms, showing StoM to detect deception attacks with a detection rate exceeding 99.1%, a false alarm rate below 0.1%, and a latency of less than 1.2 manufacturing cycles. Our empirical analysis also shows that it is highly impractical for attackers to spoof the controlled stochasticity.
Zeyu Yang 0001, Hongyi Pu, Liang He 0002, Chengtao Yao, Jianying Zhou 0001, Peng Cheng 0001, Jiming Chen 0001
RAID2
2022 Fingerprinting Movements of Industrial Robots for Replay Attack Detection
abstract
Industrial robots are prototypical cyber-physical systems widely deployed in (smart) manufacturing, which operate according to the operation code uploaded by the human operator and are monitored in real-time based on their movement data. However, industrial robots suffer from replay attacks, via which attackers can manipulate the robot operation without being observed by the monitoring system. To mitigate this vulnerability, we design a novel intrusion detection system for industrial robots using their power fingerprint, calledPIDS(Power-basedIntrusionDetectionSystem), and deliverPIDSas abump-in-the-wiremodule installed at the powerline of commodity robots. The foundation ofPIDSis the physically-induced dependency between the robot movement and the concomitant power consumption, whichPIDScaptures via joint physical analysis and (cyber) data-driven modeling.PIDSthen fingerprints the robot movements observed by the monitoring system using their expected power consumption, and cross-validates the fingerprints with empirically collected power information — a mismatch thereof flags anomalies of the observed movements (i.e., evidence of replay attack). We have evaluatedPIDSusing three models of robots from different vendors — i.e., ABB IRB120, KUKA KR6 R700, and Universal Robots UR5 robots — with over 2,000 operation cycles. Experimental results show thatPIDSdetects replay attacks at an average rate of 96.5 percent (up to 99.9 percent) and a 0.1s latency.
Hongyi Pu, Liang He 0002, Chengcheng Zhao, David K. Y. Yau, Peng Cheng 0001, Jiming Chen 0001
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput.1
2020 Detecting replay attacks against industrial robots via power fingerprinting
abstract
Industrial robots have been shown to suffer from replay attacks, via which adversaries not only manipulate the robot operation by downloading malicious code, but also prevent the detection of this manipulation by replaying recorded (and normal) movement data to the monitoring system. To protect industrial robots from replay attacks, we design a novel intrusion detection system using the power fingerprint of robots, called PIDS (Power-based Intrusion Detection System), and deliver PIDS as a bump-in-the-wire module installed at the powerline of commodity robots. The foundation of PIDS is the physically-induced dependency between the robot movement and the concomitant electrical power consumption, which PIDS captures via joint physical analysis and (cyber) data-driven modeling. PIDS then fingerprints the robot movements observed by the monitoring system using their expected power consumption, and cross-validates the fingerprints with empirically collected power information --- a mismatch thereof flags anomalies of the observed movements (i.e., evidence of replay attack). We have evaluated PIDS using three models of robots from different vendors --- i.e., ABB IRB120, KUKA KR6 R700, and Universal Robots UR5 robots --- with over 2, 000 operation cycles. The experimental results show that PIDS detects replay attacks with an average rate of 96.5% (up to 99.9%) and a 0.1s latency.
Hongyi Pu, Liang He 0002, Chengcheng Zhao, David K. Y. Yau, Peng Cheng 0001, Jiming Chen 0001
SenSys1