Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Franklin Wang

dblp:279/6058 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 63% Vision and language · 21% 3D vision · 12%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
cross-modal retrieval
0.812024
Nearest Neighbor Normalization Improves Multimodal Retrieval · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature interpretation
0.812024
A Multimodal Automated Interpretability Agent · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.812024
A Multimodal Automated Interpretability Agent · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
A Multimodal Automated Interpretability Agent · ICML 2024
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.812024
Nearest Neighbor Normalization Improves Multimodal Retrieval · EMNLP 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape reconstruction › shape from x
shape from polarization
0.412020
Deep Shape from Polarization · ECCV (24) 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nearest neighbor retrieval · 1.5contrastive learning · 1.5vision-language model · 0.8tool use · 0.8deep learning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Nearest Neighbor Normalization Improves Multimodal Retrieval
abstract
Multimodal models leverage large-scale pretraining to achieve strong but still imperfect performance on tasks such as image captioning, visual question answering, and cross-modal retrieval. In this paper, we present a simple and efficient method for correcting errors in trained contrastive image-text retrieval models with no additional training, called Nearest Neighbor Normalization (NNN). We show an improvement on retrieval metrics in both text retrieval and image retrieval for all of the contrastive models that we tested (CLIP, BLIP, ALBEF, SigLIP, BEiT) and for both of the datasets that we used (MS-COCO and Flickr30k). NNN requires a reference database, but does not require any training on this database, and can even increase the retrieval accuracy of a model after finetuning.
Neil Chowdhury, Franklin Wang, Sumedh Shenoy, Douwe Kiela, Sarah Schwettmann, Tristan Thrush
EMNLP2
2024 A Multimodal Automated Interpretability Agent
abstract
This paper describes MAIA, a Multimodal Automated Interpretability Agent. MAIA is a system that uses neural models to automate neural model understanding tasks like feature interpretation and failure mode discovery. It equips a pre-trained vision-language model with a set of tools that support iterative experimentation on subcomponents of other models to explain their behavior. These include tools commonly used by human interpretability researchers: for synthesizing and editing inputs, computing maximally activating exemplars from real-world datasets, and summarizing and describing experimental results. Interpretability experiments proposed by MAIA compose these tools to describe and explain system behavior. We evaluate applications of MAIA to computer vision models. We first characterize MAIA’s ability to describe (neuron-level) features in learned representations of images. Across several trained models and a novel dataset of synthetic vision neurons with paired ground-truth descriptions, MAIA produces descriptions comparable to those generated by expert human experimenters. We then show that MAIA can aid in two additional interpretability tasks: reducing sensitivity to spurious features, and automatically identifying inputs likely to be mis-classified.
Tamar Rott Shaham, Sarah Schwettmann, Franklin Wang, Achyuta Rajaram, Evan Hernandez, Jacob Andreas, Antonio Torralba 0001
ICML3
2020 Deep Shape from Polarization
Yunhao Ba, Alex Gilbert, Franklin Wang, Jinfa Yang, Rui Chen 0006, Boxin Shi, Achuta Kadambi
ECCV (24)3