VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter Holderrieth
dblp:279/6656
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Generative modeling · 71% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20% Deep learning architectures and training · 9% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
discrete diffusion model |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Flow Matching with General Discrete Paths: A Kinetic-Optimal Perspective · ICLR 2025 Generator Matching: Generative modeling with arbitrary Markov processes · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Flow Matching with General Discrete Paths: A Kinetic-Optimal Perspective · ICLR 2025 Generator Matching: Generative modeling with arbitrary Markov processes · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Generator Matching: Generative modeling with arbitrary Markov processes · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
discrete sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LEAPS: A discrete neural sampler via locally equivariant networks · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
equivariant neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LEAPS: A discrete neural sampler via locally equivariant networks · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative flow |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Hamiltonian Score Matching and Generative Flows · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Hamiltonian Score Matching and Generative Flows · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Equivariant Learning of Stochastic Fields: Gaussian Processes and Steerable Conditional Neural Processes · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
neural processes |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Equivariant Learning of Stochastic Fields: Gaussian Processes and Steerable Conditional Neural Processes · ICML 2021 |
Computational science and engineering
statistical physics |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | LEAPS: A discrete neural sampler via locally equivariant networks · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequential monte carlo · 1.7annealed importance sampling · 1.7radon-nikodym derivatives · 0.9radon-nikodym derivative · 0.9markov process generators · 0.9kinetic energy optimization · 0.9jump processes · 0.9generator matching · 0.9continuous-time markov chain · 0.9hamiltonian monte carlo · 0.8hamiltonian dynamics · 0.8steerable representations · 0.5equivariance · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Generator Matching: Generative modeling with arbitrary Markov processesabstractWe introduce Generator Matching, a modality-agnostic framework for generative modeling using arbitrary Markov processes. Generators characterize the infinitesimal evolution of a Markov process, which we leverage for generative modeling in a similar vein to flow matching: we construct conditional generators which generate single data points, then learn to approximate the marginal generator which generates the full data distribution. We show that Generator Matching unifies various generative modeling methods, including diffusion models, flow matching and discrete diffusion models. Furthermore, it expands the design space to new and unexplored Markov processes such as jump processes. Finally, Generator Matching enables the construction of superpositions of Markov generative models and enables the construction of multimodal models in a rigorous manner. We empirically validate our method on image and multimodal generation, e.g. showing that superposition with a jump process improves performance. Peter Holderrieth, Marton Havasi, Jason Yim, Neta Shaul, Itai Gat, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Brian Karrer, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Yaron Lipman |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Flow Matching with General Discrete Paths: A Kinetic-Optimal PerspectiveabstractThe design space of discrete-space diffusion or flow generative models are significantly less well-understood than their continuous-space counterparts, with many works focusing only on a simple masked construction.
In this work, we aim to take a holistic approach to the construction of discrete generative models based on continuous-time Markov chains, and for the first time, allow the use of arbitrary discrete probability paths, or colloquially, corruption processes.
Through the lens of optimizing the symmetric kinetic energy, we propose velocity formulas that can be applied to any given probability path, completely decoupling the probability and velocity, and giving the user the freedom to specify any desirable probability path based on expert knowledge specific to the data domain.
Furthermore, we find that a special construction of mixture probability paths optimizes the symmetric kinetic energy for the discrete case.
We empirically validate the usefulness of this new design space across multiple modalities: text generation, inorganic material generation, and image generation. We find that we can outperform the mask construction even in text with kinetic-optimal mixture paths, while we can make use of domain-specific constructions of the probability path over the visual domain. Neta Shaul, Itai Gat, Marton Havasi, Daniel Severo 0001, Anuroop Sriram, Peter Holderrieth, Brian Karrer, Yaron Lipman, Ricky T. Q. Chen |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2025 | LEAPS: A discrete neural sampler via locally equivariant networksabstractWe propose *LEAPS*, an algorithm to sample from discrete distributions known up to normalization by learning a rate matrix of a continuous-time Markov chain (CTMC). LEAPS can be seen as a continuous-time formulation of annealed importance sampling and sequential Monte Carlo methods, extended so that the variance of the importance weights is offset by the inclusion of the CTMC. To derive these importance weights, we introduce a set of Radon-Nikodym derivatives of CTMCs over their path measures. Because the computation of these weights is intractable with standard neural network parameterizations of rate matrices, we devise a new compact representation for rate matrices via what we call \textit{locally equivariant} functions. To parameterize them, we introduce a family of locally equivariant multilayer perceptrons, attention layers, and convolutional networks, and provide an approach to make deep networks that preserve the local equivariance. This property allows us to propose a scalable training algorithm for the rate matrix such that the variance of the importance weights associated to the CTMC are minimal. We demonstrate the efficacy of LEAPS on problems in statistical physics. We provide code in https://github.com/malbergo/leaps/. Peter Holderrieth, Michael S. Albergo, Tommi S. Jaakkola |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Hamiltonian Score Matching and Generative FlowsabstractClassical Hamiltonian mechanics has been widely used in machine learning in the form of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for applications with predetermined force fields. In this paper, we explore the potential of deliberately designing force fields for Hamiltonian systems, introducing Hamiltonian velocity predictors (HVPs) as a core tool for constructing energy-based and generative models. We present two innovations: Hamiltonian Score Matching (HSM), which utilizes score functions to augment data by simulating Hamiltonian trajectories, and Hamiltonian Generative Flows (HGFs), a novel generative model that encompasses diffusion models and OT-flow matching as HGFs with zero force fields. We showcase the extended design space of force fields by introducing Oscillation HGFs, a generative model inspired by harmonic oscillators. Our experiments demonstrate that HSM and HGFs rival leading score-matching and generative modeling techniques. Overall, our work systematically elucidates the synergy between Hamiltonian dynamics, force fields, and generative models, thereby opening new avenues for applications of machine learning in physical sciences and dynamical systems. Peter Holderrieth, Tommi S. Jaakkola |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Equivariant Learning of Stochastic Fields: Gaussian Processes and Steerable Conditional Neural ProcessesabstractMotivated by objects such as electric fields or fluid streams, we study the problem of learning stochastic fields, i.e. stochastic processes whose samples are fields like those occurring in physics and engineering. Considering general transformations such as rotations and reflections, we show that spatial invariance of stochastic fields requires an inference model to be equivariant. Leveraging recent advances from the equivariance literature, we study equivariance in two classes of models. Firstly, we fully characterise equivariant Gaussian processes. Secondly, we introduce Steerable Conditional Neural Processes (SteerCNPs), a new, fully equivariant member of the Neural Process family. In experiments with Gaussian process vector fields, images, and real-world weather data, we observe that SteerCNPs significantly improve the performance of previous models and equivariance leads to improvements in transfer learning tasks. Peter Holderrieth, Michael J. Hutchinson, Yee Whye Teh |
ICML | 1 |