VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sung Min Park 0002
dblp:28/157-2
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 38% Learning theory · 38% Segmentation and scene understanding · 9% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Sparse PCA from Sparse Linear Regression · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional statistics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Sparse PCA from Sparse Linear Regression · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › principal component analysis
sparse principal component analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Sparse PCA from Sparse Linear Regression · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional regression
sparse regression |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Sparse PCA from Sparse Linear Regression · NeurIPS 2018 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Sparse PCA from Sparse Linear Regression · NeurIPS 2018 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation › regression › sparse regression
lasso |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Sparse PCA from Sparse Linear Regression · NeurIPS 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
binary sequence labeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Structured Learning of Sum-of-Submodular Higher Order Energy Functions · ICCV 2013 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Structured Learning of Sum-of-Submodular Higher Order Energy Functions · ICCV 2013 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Structured Learning of Sum-of-Submodular Higher Order Energy Functions · ICCV 2013 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
submodular function minimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Structured Learning of Sum-of-Submodular Higher Order Energy Functions · ICCV 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Structured Learning of Sum-of-Submodular Higher Order Energy Functions · ICCV 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › markov random field
higher-order markov random fields |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Structured Learning of Sum-of-Submodular Higher Order Energy Functions · ICCV 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spiked covariance model · 0.7reduction · 0.7lasso · 0.7submodular flow · 0.3structural SVM · 0.3max-flow · 0.3cutting-plane algorithm · 0.2cutting plane algorithm · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Sparse PCA from Sparse Linear RegressionabstractSparse Principal Component Analysis (SPCA) and Sparse Linear Regression (SLR) have a wide range of applications and have attracted a tremendous amount of attention in the last two decades as canonical examples of statistical problems in high dimension. A variety of algorithms have been proposed for both SPCA and SLR, but an explicit connection between the two had not been made. We show how to efficiently transform a black-box solver for SLR into an algorithm for SPCA: assuming the SLR solver satisfies prediction error guarantees achieved by existing efficient algorithms such as those based on the Lasso, the SPCA algorithm derived from it achieves near state of the art guarantees for testing and for support recovery for the single spiked covariance model as obtained by the current best polynomial-time algorithms. Our reduction not only highlights the inherent similarity between the two problems, but also, from a practical standpoint, allows one to obtain a collection of algorithms for SPCA directly from known algorithms for SLR. We provide experimental results on simulated data comparing our proposed framework to other algorithms for SPCA. Guy Bresler, Sung Min Park 0002, Madalina Persu |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2013 | Structured Learning of Sum-of-Submodular Higher Order Energy FunctionsabstractSub modular functions can be exactly minimized in polynomial time, and the special case that graph cuts solve with max flow [19] has had significant impact in computer vision [5, 21, 28]. In this paper we address the important class of sum-of-sub modular (SoS) functions [2, 18], which can be efficiently minimized via a variant of max flow called sub modular flow [6]. SoS functions can naturally express higher order priors involving, e.g., local image patches, however, it is difficult to fully exploit their expressive power because they have so many parameters. Rather than trying to formulate existing higher order priors as an SoS function, we take a discriminative learning approach, effectively searching the space of SoS functions for a higher order prior that performs well on our training set. We adopt a structural SVM approach [15, 34] and formulate the training problem in terms of quadratic programming, as a result we can efficiently search the space of SoS priors via an extended cutting-plane algorithm. We also show how the state-of-the-art max flow method for vision problems [11] can be modified to efficiently solve the sub modular flow problem. Experimental comparisons are made against the OpenCV implementation of the Grab Cut interactive segmentation technique [28], which uses hand-tuned parameters instead of machine learning. On a standard dataset [12] our method learns higher order priors with hundreds of parameter values, and produces significantly better segmentations. While our focus is on binary labeling problems, we show that our techniques can be naturally generalized to handle more than two labels. Alexander Fix, Thorsten Joachims, Sung Min Park 0002, Ramin Zabih |
ICCV | 3 |