Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefan Schlee

dblp:28/4246 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge-based systems
knowledge-based system design
0.011997
Can We Benefit from Metrics in KBS Development? · IJCAI (1) 1997
Empirical software engineering
software metrics
0.011997
Can We Benefit from Metrics in KBS Development? · IJCAI (1) 1997
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Can We Benefit from Metrics in KBS Development?
Stefan Kramer 0001, Hermann Kaindl, Stefan Schlee
IJCAI (1)3