VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Roger A. Simons
dblp:28/6948
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 39% Algorithms and data structures · 30% Logic in computer science · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithms and data structures
parallel algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | New Classes for Parallel Complexity: A Study of Unification and Other Complete Problems for P · IEEE Trans. Computers 1986 |
Computational complexity › parallel complexity
parallel complexity classes |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | New Classes for Parallel Complexity: A Study of Unification and Other Complete Problems for P · IEEE Trans. Computers 1986 |
Logic in computer science
unification |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | New Classes for Parallel Complexity: A Study of Unification and Other Complete Problems for P · IEEE Trans. Computers 1986 |
Computational complexity › parallel complexity
p-completeness |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | New Classes for Parallel Complexity: A Study of Unification and Other Complete Problems for P · IEEE Trans. Computers 1986 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parallel RAM model · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | New Classes for Parallel Complexity: A Study of Unification and Other Complete Problems for PabstractPrevious theoretical work in computational complexity has suggested that any problem which is log-space complete for P is not likely in NC, and thus not parallelizable. In practice, this is not the case. To resolve this paradox, we introduce new complexity classes PC and PC* that capture the practical notion of parallelizability we discuss in this paper. We show that foqur complete problems for P (nonsparse versions of unification, path system accessibility, monotone circuit value, and ordered depth-first search) are parallelizable. That is, their running times are O(E + V) on a sequential RAM and O(E/P + V log P) on an EXCLUSIVE-READ EXCLUSIVE-WRITE Parallel RAM with P processors where V and E are the numbers of vertices and edges in the inputed instance of the problem. These problems are in PC and PC*, since an appropriate choice of P can speed up their sequential running times by a factor of μ(P). Several interesting open questions are raised regarding these new parallel complexity classes PC and PC*. Unification is particularly important because it is a basic operation in theorem proving, in type inference algorithms, and in logic programming languages such as Prolog. A fast parallel implementation of Prolog is needed for software development in the Fifth Generation project. Jeffrey Scott Vitter, Roger A. Simons |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |