Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andriy Zapechelnyuk
dblp:28/7260 · also Andy Zapechelnyuk
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5033-3848ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › information design
bayesian persuasion |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On Monotone Persuasion · EC 2025 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › information design
optimal signaling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On Monotone Persuasion · EC 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mechanism design · 0.9linear programming · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | On Monotone PersuasionabstractWe study monotone persuasion in the linear case, where posterior distributions over states are summarized by their mean. We develop a novel methodological approach to solve the two leading cases where optimal unrestricted signals can be nonmonotone. First, if the objective is s-shaped and the state is discrete, then optimal monotone signals are upper censorship, whereas optimal unrestricted signals may require randomization. Second, if the objective is m-shaped and the state is continuous, then optimal monotone signals are interval disclosure, whereas optimal unrestricted signals may require nonmonotone pooling. Unlike with unrestricted persuasion, the value of monotone persuasion can decrease with the informativeness of the prior. We illustrate our results with an application to media censorship. Anton Kolotilin, Andriy Zapechelnyuk |
EC | 3 |