Several studies have shown that automated support for different activities of the security patch management process has great potential for reducing delays in installing security patches. However, it is also important to understand how automation is used in practice, its limitations in meeting real-world needs and what practitioners really need, an area that has not been empirically investigated in the existing software engineering literature. This paper reports an empirical study aimed at investigating different aspects of automation for security patch management using semi-structured interviews with 17 practitioners from three different organisations in the healthcare domain. The findings are focused on the role of automation in security patch management for providing insights into the as-is state of automation in practice, the limitations of current automation, how automation support can be enhanced to effectively meet practitioners’ needs, and the role of the human in an automated process. Based on the findings, we have derived a set of recommendations for directing future efforts aimed at developing automated support for security patch management.

Numerous security attacks that resulted in devastating consequences can be traced back to a delay in applying a security patch. Despite the criticality of timely patch application, not much is known about why and how delays occur when applying security patches in practice, and how the delays can be mitigated. Based on longitudinal data collected from 132 delayed patching tasks over a period of four years and observations of patch meetings involving eight teams from two organisations in the healthcare domain, and using quantitative and qualitative data analysis approaches, we identify a set of reasons relating to technology, people and organisation as key explanations that cause delays in patching. Our findings also reveal that the most prominent cause of delays is attributable to coordination delays in the patch management process and a majority of delays occur during the patch deployment phase. Towards mitigating the delays, we describe a set of strategies employed by the studied practitioners. This research serves as the first step toward understanding the practical reasons for delays and possible mitigation strategies in vulnerability patch management. Our findings provide useful insights for practitioners to understand what and where improvement is needed in the patch management process and guide them towards taking timely actions against potential attacks. Also, our findings help researchers to invest effort into designing and developing computer-supported tools to better support a timely security patch management process.

Several disastrous security attacks can be attributed to delays in patching software vulnerabilities. While researchers and practitioners have paid significant attention to automate vulnerabilities identification and patch development activities of software security patch management, there has been relatively little effort dedicated to gain an in-depth understanding of the socio-technical aspects, e.g., coordination of interdependent activities of the patching process and patching decisions, that may cause delays in applying security patches. We report on a Grounded Theory study of the role of coordination in security patch management. The reported theory consists of four inter-related dimensions, i.e., causes, breakdowns, constraints, and mechanisms. The theory explains the causes that define the need for coordination among interdependent software/hardware components and multiple stakeholders’ decisions, the constraints that can negatively impact coordination, the breakdowns in coordination, and the potential corrective measures. This study provides potentially useful insights for researchers and practitioners who can carefully consider the needs of and devise suitable solutions for supporting the coordination of interdependencies involved in security patch management.