Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ron van Bree

dblp:280/0165 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Environmental and earth informatics · 50% Computational science and engineering · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Image recognition and object detection · 33%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Environmental and earth informatics › ecology
computational ecology
0.912025
Hybrid Phenology Modeling for Predicting Temperature Effects on Tree Dormancy · AAAI 2025
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
physics-informed machine learning
0.912025
Hybrid Phenology Modeling for Predicting Temperature Effects on Tree Dormancy · AAAI 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification
0.512021
Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-Grained Image Recognition · CVPR 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.512021
Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-Grained Image Recognition · CVPR 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › example-based explanation
prototype-based explanation
0.512021
Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-Grained Image Recognition · CVPR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural network · 0.9biophysical model · 0.9pruning · 0.5prototype learning · 0.5ensemble · 0.5decision tree · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Hybrid Phenology Modeling for Predicting Temperature Effects on Tree Dormancy
abstract
Biophysical models offer valuable insights into climate-phenology relationships in both natural and agricultural settings. However, there are substantial structural discrepancies across models which require site-specific recalibration, often yielding inconsistent predictions under similar climate scenarios. Machine learning methods offer data-driven solutions, but often lack interpretability and alignment with existing knowledge. We present a phenology model describing dormancy in fruit trees, integrating conventional biophysical models with a neural network to address their structural disparities. We evaluate our hybrid model in an extensive case study predicting cherry tree phenology in Japan, South Korea and Switzerland. Our approach consistently outperforms both traditional biophysical and machine learning models in predicting blooming dates across years. Additionally, the neural network's adaptability facilitates parameter learning for specific tree varieties, enabling robust generalization to new sites without site-specific recalibration. This hybrid model leverages both biophysical constraints and data-driven flexibility, offering a promising avenue for accurate and interpretable phenology modeling.
Ron van Bree, Diego Marcos, Ioannis N. Athanasiadis
AAAI1
2021 Neural Prototype Trees for Interpretable Fine-Grained Image Recognition
abstract
Prototype-based methods use interpretable representations to address the black-box nature of deep learning models, in contrast to post-hoc explanation methods that only approximate such models. We propose the Neural Prototype Tree (ProtoTree), an intrinsically interpretable deep learning method for fine-grained image recognition. ProtoTree combines prototype learning with decision trees, and thus results in a globally interpretable model by design. Additionally, ProtoTree can locally explain a single prediction by outlining a decision path through the tree. Each node in our binary tree contains a trainable prototypical part. The presence or absence of this learned prototype in an image determines the routing through a node. Decision making is therefore similar to human reasoning: Does the bird have a red throat? And an elongated beak? Then it’s a hummingbird! We tune the accuracy-interpretability trade-off using ensemble methods, pruning and binarizing. We apply pruning without sacrificing accuracy, resulting in a small tree with only 8 learned prototypes along a path to classify a bird from 200 species. An ensemble of 5 ProtoTrees achieves competitive accuracy on the CUB-200-2011 and Stanford Cars data sets. Code is available at github.com/M-Nauta/ProtoTree.
Meike Nauta, Ron van Bree, Christin Seifert
CVPR2