Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shiv Kumar Tavker
dblp:280/1266
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 61% Learning theory · 39% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › algorithmic fairness
fairness constraints |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Consistent Multiclass Algorithms for Complex Metrics and Constraints · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
multiclass classification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Consistent Multiclass Algorithms for Complex Metrics and Constraints · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Consistent Plug-in Classifiers for Complex Objectives and Constraints · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimization over confusion matrices · 0.8plug-in classifier · 0.4convex optimization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Consistent Multiclass Algorithms for Complex Metrics and ConstraintsabstractWe present consistent algorithms for multiclass learning with complex performance metrics and constraints, where the objective and constraints are defined by arbitrary functions of the confusion matrix. This setting includes many common performance metrics such as the multiclass G-mean and micro F-measure, and constraints such as those on the classifier's precision and recall and more recent measures of fairness discrepancy. We give a general framework for designing consistent algorithms for such complex design goals by viewing the learning problem as an optimization problem over the set of feasible confusion matrices. We provide multiple instantiations of our framework under different assumptions on the performance metrics and constraints, and in each case show rates of convergence to the optimal (feasible) classifier (and thus asymptotic consistency). Experiments on a variety of multiclass classification tasks and fairness constrained problems show that our algorithms compare favorably to the state-of-the-art baselines. Harikrishna Narasimhan, Harish G. Ramaswamy, Shiv Kumar Tavker, Drona Khurana, Praneeth Netrapalli, Shivani Agarwal 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2020 | Consistent Plug-in Classifiers for Complex Objectives and ConstraintsabstractWe present a statistically consistent algorithm for constrained classification problems where the objective (e.g. F-measure, G-mean) and the constraints (e.g. demographic parity, coverage) are defined by general functions of the confusion matrix. The key idea is to reduce the problem into a sequence of plug-in classifier learning problems, which is done by formulating an optimization problem over the intersection of the set of achievable confusion matrices and the set of feasible matrices. For objective and constraints that are convex functions of the confusion matrix, our algorithm requires $O(1/\epsilon^2)$ calls to the plug-in routine, which improves on the $O(1/\epsilon^3)$ rate achieved by Narasimhan (2018). We demonstrate empirically that our algorithm performs at least as well as the state-of-the-art methods for these problems. Shiv Kumar Tavker, Harish G. Ramaswamy, Harikrishna Narasimhan |
NeurIPS | 1 |