Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Allan Mancoo
dblp:280/1350
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
biologically plausible learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Understanding spiking networks through convex optimization · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
spiking neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Understanding spiking networks through convex optimization · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Understanding spiking networks through convex optimization · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
linear and quadratic programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Understanding spiking networks through convex optimization · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
expectation-maximization · 0.9convex optimization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Understanding spiking networks through convex optimizationabstractNeurons mainly communicate through spikes, and much effort has been spent to understand how the dynamics of spiking neural networks (SNNs) relates to their connectivity. Meanwhile, most major advances in machine learning have been made with simpler, rate-based networks, with SNNs only recently showing competitive results, largely thanks to transferring insights from rate to spiking networks. However, it is still an open question exactly which computations SNNs perform. Recently, the time-averaged firing rates of several SNNs were shown to yield the solutions to convex optimization problems. Here we turn these findings around and show that virtually all inhibition-dominated SNNs can be understood through the lens of convex optimization, with network connectivity, timescales, and firing thresholds being intricately linked to the parameters of underlying convex optimization problems. This approach yields new, geometric insights into the computations performed by spiking networks. In particular, we establish a class of SNNs whose instantaneous output provides a solution to linear or quadratic programming problems, and we thereby reveal their input-output mapping. Using these insights, we derive local, supervised learning rules that can approximate given convex input-output functions, and we show that the resulting networks are consistent with many features from biological networks, such as low firing rates, irregular firing, E/I balance, and robustness to perturbations and synaptic delays. Allan Mancoo, Sander Keemink, Christian K. Machens |
NeurIPS | 1 |