Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter Hayes

dblp:280/1610 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Reinforcement learning · 26% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 24% Language models and text generation · 23%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video coding · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › preference learning
active preference learning
0.812024
Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models · ICML 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.812024
Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models · ICML 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization
0.812024
Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
preference learning
0.812024
Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
amortized inference
0.612022
Generalization Gap in Amortized Inference · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization error
generalization gap
0.612022
Generalization Gap in Amortized Inference · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.612022
Generalization Gap in Amortized Inference · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.612022
Generalization Gap in Amortized Inference · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
divergence measure
0.412020
Spread Divergence · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling
implicit generative model
0.412020
Spread Divergence · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.212024
Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback › learning from human feedback
RLHF
0.212024
Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models · ICML 2024
Image and video coding
lossless compression
0.212022
Generalization Gap in Amortized Inference · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational inference · 1.1training objective design · 1.1predictive entropy · 0.8acquisition function · 0.8independent component analysis · 0.4divergence minimization · 0.4deep generative network · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models
abstract
As large language models (LLMs) become more capable, fine-tuning techniques for aligning with human intent are increasingly important. A key consideration for aligning these models is how to most effectively use human resources, or model resources in the case where LLMs themselves are used as oracles. Reinforcement learning from Human or AI preferences (RLHF/RLAIF) is the most prominent example of such a technique, but is complex and often unstable. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently been proposed as a simpler and more stable alternative. In this work, we develop an active learning strategy for DPO to make better use of preference labels. We propose a practical acquisition function for prompt/completion pairs based on the predictive entropy of the language model and a measure of certainty of the implicit preference model optimized by DPO. We demonstrate how our approach improves both the rate of learning and final performance of fine-tuning on pairwise preference data.
William Muldrew, Peter Hayes, Mingtian Zhang, David Barber
ICML2
2023 Neural network models for influenza forecasting with associated uncertainty using Web search activity trends
abstract
Influenza affects millions of people every year. It causes a considerable amount of medical visits and hospitalisations as well as hundreds of thousands of deaths. Forecasting influenza prevalence with good accuracy can significantly help public health agencies to timely react to seasonal or novel strain epidemics. Although significant progress has been made, influenza forecasting remains a challenging modelling task. In this paper, we propose a methodological framework that improves over the state-of-the-art forecasting accuracy of influenza-like illness (ILI) rates in the United States. We achieve this by using Web search activity time series in conjunction with historical ILI rates as observations for training neural network (NN) architectures. The proposed models incorporate Bayesian layers to produce associated uncertainty intervals to their forecast estimates, positioning themselves as legitimate complementary solutions to more conventional approaches. The best performing NN, referred to as the iterative recurrent neural network (IRNN) architecture, reduces mean absolute error by 10.3% and improves skill by 17.1% on average in nowcasting and forecasting tasks across 4 consecutive flu seasons.
Michael Morris, Peter Hayes, Ingemar J. Cox, Vasileios Lampos
PLoS Comput. Biol.2
2022 Generalization Gap in Amortized Inference
abstract
The ability of likelihood-based probabilistic models to generalize to unseen data is central to many machine learning applications such as lossless compression. In this work, we study the generalization of a popular class of probabilistic model - the Variational Auto-Encoder (VAE). We discuss the two generalization gaps that affect VAEs and show that overfitting is usually dominated by amortized inference. Based on this observation, we propose a new training objective that improves the generalization of amortized inference. We demonstrate how our method can improve performance in the context of image modeling and lossless compression.
Mingtian Zhang, Peter Hayes, David Barber
NeurIPS2
2020 Spread Divergence
abstract
For distributions $\mathbb{P}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$ with different supports or undefined densities, the divergence $\textrm{D}(\mathbb{P}||\mathbb{Q})$ may not exist. We define a Spread Divergence $\tilde{\textrm{D}}(\mathbb{P}||\mathbb{Q})$ on modified $\mathbb{P}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$ and describe sufficient conditions for the existence of such a divergence. We demonstrate how to maximize the discriminatory power of a given divergence by parameterizing and learning the spread. We also give examples of using a Spread Divergence to train implicit generative models, including linear models (Independent Components Analysis) and non-linear models (Deep Generative Networks).
Mingtian Zhang, Peter Hayes, Thomas Bird, Raza Habib, David Barber
ICML2